Friday, August 29, 2014

James Foley: Slain While Pursuing His Calling

 © 2014 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com

U.S. citizen James Foley was doing his job as a journalist and photographer, documenting in words and pictures the suffering of people in the Syrian Civil War, when he was abducted by a Syrian militia group November 22, 2012. Eventually, he was put into the hands of the self-proclaimed jihadist group Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), who beheaded him on August 19, saying his slaying was in retaliation for U.S. air strikes against ISIS forces in Iraq.
Foley was a Roman Catholic Christian, and at a mass for him following his slaying, Bishop Peter Libasci made it clear that Foley's job was not merely an income-producing activity, but was also his vocation, his calling from God. The bishop said that Foley was living his faith by filing images and reports of people suffering from war and oppressive regimes.
Foley's kidnapping in Syria was not his first detention for pursuing his work; he'd been captured in Libya in 2011 and held for 44 days. But, said the bishop, Foley "went back again that we might open our eyes."
Following Foley's death, David McKay Wilson, who had interviewed Foley in 2011, wrote in USA Today that "Foley was a devout Christian who, unlike most journalists I've known during my almost four decades in the field, was unapologetic about his heart for social justice and the inspiration he found for his beliefs in the New Testament."
The slain journalist's parents, John and Diane Foley, explained on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" that their son's experience while an undergrad at Marquette University, a Catholic and Jesuit school, helped him choose his life's course.
"Jimmy was challenged when he first met poverty and disadvantage at Marquette University," John Foley said. "Since that moment his soul and heart grew and grew and grew to encompass all those people who needed help, needed their stories told. He began to love all and that was his biggest gift to the people he met. His love and his help."
When one of the "Morning Joe" hosts suggested that the younger Foley grew to feel a responsibility to help others, John Foley responded, "He ran with it. He grew stronger and more committed."
"He was home in October 2012 for his birthday," Diane Foley said. "He looked so good. I said, 'Jim, can't you stay home through Christmas?' He said, 'Oh, Ma, I have to go back, but I will be home for Christmas.' He had made promises. He was so committed to the people whose suffering he was trying to humanize. He wanted the world to know, to know how people were suffering, particularly the children."
More on this story can be found at these links:
The Big Questions
Here are some of the questions we will discuss in class:
1. Does God call every Christian to some vocation (which may or may not coincide with that person's means of earning a living)? Does God often call individuals to more than one vocation at a time? Explain your answer.
2. How can you tell the difference between a call from God and a "career opportunity"? Can they ever be one and the same? How do we know? What do you consider your vocation? How do you distinguish between a call from God and an itching of your own for change? How might your current job (or former job, if retired or unemployed) be considered service to others?
3. Are some callings from God for a limited term? Are some callings from God sequential rather than permanent? Explain your answer. Although we are impressed (rightfully so) with those who give years of service to others, is there a qualitative difference between vocations that last a short versus a long time?
4. Does every call from God require sacrifice from us? Why or why not? Even if a calling requires sacrifice, does it count as a sacrifice if we also enjoy ourselves? Can a vocation lie in recruiting others to make sacrifices and engage in mission or ministry?
5. When has a news report or photos of some situation far from where you live "opened your eyes"? Did you hear any kind of calling in that? Once your eyes were "opened," what form did your response take?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
We will look at selected verses from these Scripture texts. You may wish to read these in advance for background:
In class, we will talk about these passages and look for some insight into the big questions, as well as talk about other questions you may have about this topic. Please join us.

Friday, August 22, 2014

 © 2014 The Wired Word 
www.thewiredword.com
As we write this lesson at midweek, the Missouri town of Ferguson is still the scene of nightly protests in the streets, some of which include lawless behavior, triggered by the fatal shooting on August 9 of an unarmed black man, Michael Brown, 18, by a white police officer, Darren Wilson, 28. Brown was shot at least six times; Wilson suffered an orbital blowout fracture to his face.
One of the difficulties in talking about this situation is the absence of undisputed facts and the rush to judgment that is outrunning a full investigation of the shooting.
Wikipedia's report of the incident (accessed August 19) stated the following:
"Brown was unarmed and had no criminal record. According to Ferguson police, Brown was a suspect in a robbery allegedly committed minutes before the shooting, although the initial contact between Wilson and Brown was unrelated to the alleged robbery. Wilson had served four years with the Ferguson Police Department after serving two years with another local police department. He had no disciplinary history."
Wikipedia, citing The Washington Post, further said that the "shooting of a black male by a white police officer sparked unrest in Ferguson due to longstanding racial tensions in a region that is 'among the most segregated metropolitan areas in the nation.'"
According to the general-interest news site Vox, there are currently nine undisputed facts about the situation in Ferguson related to the shooting of Brown. We have summarized and expanded a bit the Vox headings here, but we encourage you to read the full article, included in the links list below. The nine are as follows:
1) Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown on Saturday, August 9.
2) Ferguson is a majority-black city with an overwhelmingly white police force and city government.
3) Eyewitnesses have given contradictory accounts of the incident, some of which contradict police accounts of the shooting.
4) Several different law enforcement agencies are involved in the response to the shooting and the protests.
5) The police have to date not released the autopsy report or any information about their investigation of what happened during the shooting.
6) Protests began immediately after Brown's death, and continued throughout the week.
7) The protests were at times met with an aggressive police response.
8) The police released video of Brown apparently strong-arm robbing a convenience store; Wilson did not connect Brown to the robbery until after he had stopped him for walking down the center of a street.
9) The federal government is also investigating Brown's death.
Last Sunday, prayers in two Ferguson area churches made the news. One is Southminster Presbyterian, a largely white congregation located just behind the suburban home of Officer Darren Wilson. The other is Greater St. Mark Family Church, a largely black congregation. The Washington Post article that reported the prayers made it sound as if Southminster offered prayers only for Wilson while St. Mark offered prayers only for the Brown family. We suspect that report was overdrawn for the sake of contrast, but the article did highlight the differing concerns of the two congregations.
Perhaps an NPR article on Sunday services in the Ferguson area was more on target when it reported that "sermons at both black and white congregations sounded similar messages -- calling for the tough community conversations that haven't happened yet."
Speaking for more than himself, Mike Trautman, pastor of the overwhelmingly white First Presbyterian Church of Ferguson, said, "I am hoping that out of this we can renew the dialogue [about the underlying racism in the community]. But we have to have a different dialogue. We have to learn to talk to one another a little differently."
More on this story can be found at these links:
9 Essential Facts about Ferguson and the Shooting of Michael Brown. Vox
Shooting of Michael Brown. Wikipedia 
Two Churches in Missouri Are Filled With Faith, but Common Ground Remains Elusive. Washington Post
In Ferguson, Local Faith Leaders Call For 'Different Dialogue.' NPR 
Ferguson Cop Who Walked Middle of Road Finds Critics Coming Both Ways. The Guardian
The Big Questions
1. Does the experience of growing up of one race automatically equip a person to understand the perspectives of those who have grown up as part of a different race? Does it automatically disqualify a person from understanding and empathizing with those of other races? Can a person guarantee that his or her interpretations of experiences are objectively correct? How much do you think your own race affects how you answer a question like this?
2. What might it mean, in a Christian context, to learn to talk across racial divides "a little differently"?
3. In what ways does the "racism" label interfere with healthy human interaction? In what ways does it identify unhelpful attitudes and actions? What would be a better word or label that would make people more comfortable talking about these matters? What guidance do you find in the Bible this?
4. To what extent do you think the turmoil in Ferguson is an outgrowth of frustration caused by real racial discrimination? To what extent do you think the turmoil is exacerbated by people using the occasion for other purposes? Explain your answers.
5. In "angry times," do Christians have a greater responsibility than the population at large to not contribute to the uproar with confrontational opinions? Why or why not? What is the role of the church at such times?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Job 6:20
They are disappointed because they were confident; they come there and are confounded. (For context, read 6:14-21.)
This is from one of suffering Job's responses to his friends who have insisted he must have done wrong to have had great calamity fall upon him. In verses 14-21, Job is telling them that they have been of no comfort to him. In fact, in verses 15-17, he compares his friends to a wadi, a streambed that is often dry but which, in times of storm, can become a raging torrent. A wadi has abundant water exactly when water is not needed and no water when water could be lifesaving.
Thus in verse 20, quoted above, Job likens himself to a thirsty caravaneer who arrived at such a streambed confident of finding water (i.e., comfort from his friends), only to be "disappointed" and "confounded." (Those are two words the Bible uses to denote human frustration.)
Questions: Might frustration describe your emotion if you'd been told conditions for and acceptance of your family or group would eventually improve, but such improvements have not happened? What might such frustration cause you to do in the face of apparent injustice against a member of your family or group? Would such actions be just?
Job's biggest concern is that he is not being heard, either by his friends or by the heavenly court. He does not believe there can be justice in his case. Where does your frustration go when you run into a brick wall due to red tape, injustice or false charges?
Genesis 4:9
Then the LORD said to Cain, "Where is your brother Abel?" He said, "I do not know; am I my brother's keeper?" (For context, read 4:1-16.)

This is part of the dialog between God and Cain after Cain, in anger, had killed his brother Abel. God's question to Cain implies that humans have a responsibility for one another. Cain lied in his reply, saying he did not know where Abel was, and then tried to evade responsibility with the flippant rhetorical question, "Am I my brother's keeper?" But God wasn't talking to him because Cain was his brother's keeper (guardian or warden) who had failed on the job; God was talking to him because Cain was his brother's murderer. Even so, the biblical witness is that we are to help and befriend others, and in popular usage, this has come to be called "being your brother's keeper." So in that sense, the biblical answer to Cain's question is "Yes, you are."
It's possible, of course, that if God were to ask us where our brother or sister -- who is of a different ethnic group from us -- is, we might, unlike Cain, be telling the truth if we answered, "I don't know." We might be in real ignorance of the difficulties and obstacles that person is facing. But even if that is the case, we cannot be true to our faith if we go on to say that we are not our brother or sister's keeper.
Questions: How should we practice/live out in our own community the biblical principle that we are our brothers' and sisters' keepers? Is there a time when people stop being your brother or sister and when you cease to be their keeper? Are the people in Ferguson your sisters and brothers? Does their plight have anything to do with you?
John 8:48
The Jews answered him, "Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?" (For context, read 8:31-48.)
"Jews" in the verse above actually refers not to Jews in general who, on the whole, accepted Jesus, but to a small group of Jews who had originally accepted him but then changed their minds (see v. 31). Verses 31-48 and following detail a conversation between this small group and Jesus. After Jesus points out that this group is not acting like the descendants of Abraham should, they accuse him of being a Samaritan and thus being demon-possessed.
The Samaritans were a group with some Jewish blood but also a mixed-race ancestry who worshiped God, but not in exactly the same way the "real" Jews did. Thus, in Jesus' day, many Jews thought of Samaritans as second-class people or worse. The statement against Jesus quoted above shows the depth of the racism in the society of that day. The assumption is that if Jesus were a Samaritan, then he would have to have a demon because, in the biased thinking of that day, all Samaritans were lumped together as demon-possessed. It was no different from saying today that a black person must be lazy because all blacks are lazy or that a Jewish person today must be greedy because all Jews are greedy or that a white person must have succeeded because all whites are privileged.
Questions: What incidents in your life have forced you to consider whether you were stereotyping others? Have you ever decided that you were? If so, did you make any changes in your actions?
Luke 6:31
Do to others as you would have them do to you. (For context, read 6:27-36.)

This, of course, is the "Golden Rule," and all the world's major religions have some equivalent of it.
We have quoted the Golden Rule from Luke's gospel, but Matthew's gospel also quotes this little one-sentence sermon (7:12). In Matthew, Jesus designates it as a summary of "the law and the prophets," that is, of the Old Testament itself. In other words, this mandate about correct behavior is from God, not from human beings.
But in Luke, Jesus ties this "rule" to the string of insults and injustices the obedient may be forced to suffer. Jesus suggests that our behavior should be governed according to God's principles -- not the retaliatory, revengeful, let's-pay-them-back instincts of human beings. In other words, this single sentence is a statement of Christian ethics. Simply put, it advises us to treat others the way we'd like to be treated.
Questions: In what specific ways do we practice the Golden Rule in our common life as Americans? Where in our common life do we need to apply it more faithfully? What limits do you put on the Golden Rule? Do folks at the food pantry in our churches get extra stuff on occasion or only what they "deserve"? What are the limits to the Golden Rule when it comes to cash we may or may not give out to church members or strangers in need?
Romans 2:11
For God shows no partiality. (For context, read 2:1-11.)
Paul, the writer of this verse, was making a profound statement to his own people, who, because of their religious heritage, thought they were more protected from God's judgment than the Gentiles. But Paul here argues that not only are they not more protected if they do wrong; neither are they more entitled if they do right. Both the judgment and the blessings of God are for all, depending on their faith and works, without distinction, because God shows no partiality.
Questions: Does this mean that to be godly, we, too, need to show no partiality? Explain your answer. Paul is writing to a church in a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, multi-national setting. What is your situation as a congregation? Are you homogenous? Do you possess a fair amount of diversity? What is your definition of partiality? What distinctions are helpful to make?
For Further Discussion
1. Respond to this, from TWW team member Maria Green, telling about her reaction to the Ferguson shooting and others like it: "As a mother, I worry about my son, even though we live in a 'nice' hamlet outside of the Beltway. Police officers looking for an African American male will see my son's color. They won't know or care that he is a peace-loving 22-year-old, with Asperger's and a genius-level IQ, has never thought about committing a crime, has a strong sense of right and wrong and is an art student. If he is in the wrong neighborhood at the wrong time (anyplace and anytime), an officer could shoot him as he reaches in his pocket to get his ID."
2. To what extent are you "tired" of stories involving questions of race? Do you believe these stories no longer have merit? Do you find race to be a major factor in American society, whether or not it is acknowledged in all sectors?
3. What has your church or community done to create credible credentials to be able to work across racial lines to instigate dialog and create solutions? Who in your congregation or denomination might have the most to offer in a situation like Ferguson?
Responding to the News
This is a time to work doubly hard to put ourselves in the shoes of people whose experience of life in America is very different from our own.
Regarding the Ferguson story, we should not let ourselves get sidetracked by the rioting and looting following the shooting of Michael Brown. The rioting, looting and related violence are wrong -- and much of it, according to news reports, was the work of outsiders who came into Ferguson -- but those actions are peripheral to the central facts in this story: An unarmed (which does not necessarily mean harmless) black man was shot to death by a police officer who claims he feared for his safety. One man is dead, the life of a police officer with an unblemished record has been indelibly changed, and the families and communities are suffering.
Closing Prayer
Open our eyes, Lord, that we may see our neighbors as you see them. In Jesus' name. Amen.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Robin Williams, Dead in Apparent Suicide, Had Battled Depression



© 2014 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com
Comedian and actor Robin Williams, 63, known for his rapid-fire improvisations, ricochet riffs on topics high and low, over-the-top comedic portrayals and manic impersonations, as well as for serious dramatic roles, died Monday in his California home, apparently by his own hand.
His publicist said in a statement that Williams had "been battling severe depression."
His wife, Susan Schneider, said in a statement, "This morning, I lost my husband and my best friend, while the world lost one of its most beloved artists and beautiful human beings." She added, "As he is remembered, it is our hope the focus will not be on Robin's death, but on the countless moments of joy and laughter he gave to millions."
Unlike some comedians who mimic movie stars, politicians, people in power and others, Williams seemed to have the ability to do so without offending people, even when being irreverent. He was also known for his charitable work, kindness and generosity, and for entertaining U.S. troops overseas.
In a statement, President Obama called Williams "one of a kind." Then, alluding to the comedian's breakout role in the Mork and Mindy TV show, the president said that Williams "arrived in our lives as an alien -- but he ended up touching every element of the human spirit. He made us laugh. He made us cry. He gave his immeasurable talent freely and generously to those who needed it most -- from our troops stationed abroad to the marginalized on our own streets."
Williams had acknowledged problems with drugs and alcohol, but had sought treatment. He'd also had heart surgery in 2009, an event that he said caused him to take stock of his life.
The expenses of two divorces with large alimony payments (which he jokingly called "all the money" and described as "ripping your heart out through your wallet") were only a part of the money problems he faced. He had been trying to raise cash by selling his Napa ranch, but was unable to find a buyer at the $35 million asking price -- or even at 15 percent off that price. Although he disliked both TV work and doing sequels, he had recently taken jobs in both -- and found that even with his best efforts, his TV series The Crazy Ones was cancelled this May after one season.
For many, the acknowledgment of Williams' severe depression comes as no surprise; it's long been known that people who frequent the manic end of the emotional spectrum sometimes find themselves at the depressive end as well.
Writing for CNN, Todd Leopold said, "Show business history is filled with stories of comic kings who fought against depression and substance abuse, not always successfully. Jonathan Winters, Williams' hero, was institutionalized for a time. The effortless Dick Van Dyke once said he was 'mostly drunk for 15 years.' John Belushi and Chris Farley died of overdoses. Mitch Hedberg, Freddie Prinze, Richard Jeni -- all funny men, all gone before their time."
Upon learning of Williams' death, comedian Michael Ian Black tweeted, "We lose at least one great comic to suicide or ODs every year. Our jobs are to communicate, but we seem to not know how to ask for help."
Some ordinary people, too, could identify with Williams' despair. Among the reader comments following one CNN article about the actor's death, we noticed these two:
"Depression is truly evil; feels like a possession. RIP :("
"... depression [is] not just one or two 'down moments'; it's a pervasive, persistent despair that is largely independent of your circumstances. You can have everything and still feel like dying ... it's so hard."
In fact, Robin Williams is part of the demographic with the highest risk for suicide: older white men with a history of substance abuse and depression. This group has seen a spike in its suicide rate over the past decade and a half, with an increase of nearly 40 percent.
On a TV program, Williams was once asked, "If heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the pearly gates?" The comedian responded with a joke about a concert including Mozart and Elvis, and then added that he'd like "to know that there's laughter."
More on this story can be found at these links:
Robin Williams, Oscar-Winning Comedian, Dies at 63 in Suspected Suicide. New York Times
Robin Williams and the Dark Side of Comedy. CNN
Robin Williams Had 'Serious Money Troubles' ... Daily Mail
Robin Williams in a Group Facing Higher Risk of Suicide. Washington Post
Robin Williams on Laughter in Heaven. PIX 11
5 Facts You Didn't Know About Robin Williams. Huffington Post
The Big Questions
1. Since some sadness and occasional depression are normal parts of living, how can we self-determine if we are suffering from chronic clinical depression? How do we determine when we need help to deal with it? (If you have experienced crippling depression and feel able to share, discuss times you were able to accept help and/or found yourself able to listen to those who care for you. Tell about a time you tried to help another.)
2. What makes Christians who are depressed sometimes reluctant to acknowledge it? When, if ever, have you heard sermons, Sunday School lessons, or simply the words of fellow Christians (including yourself) discussing depression as a character flaw, a sin or something that could be easily fixed if that person would just "pull himself/herself out of it"?
3. What are some ways people or society encourage depression by means of false accusations, unreasonable expectations or encouraging unhelpful self-esteem standards or self-identity criteria? How does sin encourage these? How does the gospel of salvation from sin help avoid these?
4. In what ways can the church reach out to people who are suffering from recurring depression? What resources does your denomination provide to help with depression?
5. To what degree does faith interact with moods and emotions? Do you think a confession of faith is more powerful coming from someone who is suffering, whether from depression or another condition? Why or why not?
6. How would you summarize the Christian message of hope to someone in deep despair? How do you avoid making this message of hope sound like a bandage instead of real comfort?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Numbers 11:14-15
I am not able to carry all this people alone, for they are too heavy for me. If this is the way you are going to treat me, put me to death at once. (For context, read 11:1, 10-17.)
Here's a statement Moses makes to God that suggests Moses is overcome by the burden of leading the Israelites in the wilderness. He's in such despair that he says to God, "If this is the way you are going to treat me, put me to death at once."
Not all depression is alike, however. Sometimes we feel "down" because of circumstances, but when the circumstances improve, so does our mood. This can be called "situational" depression." Such depression can be an occasional but reasonable occurrence even for people who are in sound emotional health.
Likewise, a person in sound emotional health can have a down day now and then without it being tied to a particular circumstance, and without it being a symptom of an overall problem. Such is simply a normal part of life for many people. Call it "occasional" or "short-term" depression or, perhaps, "the pain of being human."
But there is another kind of depression that is not usually driven by our circumstances (though it can be triggered by circumstances), but which is recurring and crippling. This is sometimes described as "clinical," "chronic" or "recurrent" depression. We suspect this is the kind of depression the online commenter was referring to when he or she wrote, "depression [is] not just one or two 'down moments'; it's a pervasive, persistent despair that is largely independent of your circumstances. You can have everything and still feel like dying ... it's so hard."
Today, chronic depression is sometimes understood as at least partly rooted in body chemistry, and many people find help from prescribed medications and/or counseling. A small percentage of people with recurrent depression do not appear to be helped by such treatments, and some find the help not to be lasting, but medical science and psychiatry continue to address the illness. Given that available treatments do help most people, it's generally a good move for those with chronic depression to seek medical help.
From the evidence available from the Numbers account, it seems likely that Moses was experiencing situational rather than occasional or chronic depression. Once God addressed Moses' circumstances through a shared leadership arrangement (the 70 elders), Moses was able to resume his work.
But even situational depression can be debilitating; it led Moses to suggest that God kill him!
Questions: When have you felt down and were able to identify circumstances that accounted for your feelings? When have you felt depressed without being able to identify a cause? How did you find help? Does your congregation have a good record when it comes to sharing burdens? Do you personally welcome burden sharing or do you resent it?
1 Kings 19:4
But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a solitary broom tree. He asked that he might die: "It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life, for I am no better than my ancestors." (For context, read 19:1-18.)
Here we encounter the prophet Elijah deeply depressed, despite the fact that he'd just had a major success. In a confrontation with some 450 prophets of the god Baal and 400 prophets of the goddess Asherah, Elijah, alone representing Israel's God, proved that his God was the only one with power. You can read the details of that encounter in 1 Kings 18. But here in chapter 19, Elijah is anything but pumped up from his resounding triumph in the name of God. In fact, hearing that Israel's queen, Jezebel, is after him because he trumped her prophets, Elijah hightails it out of the area. Then, when he is safely away, all his energy leaves him, and he's overcome with despair.
We are not merely guessing at Elijah's state of mind. This is one case where the biblical author tells us what's up with the prophet both by using metaphor and by quoting Elijah's own words. The metaphor is in the detail that Elijah, alone in the wilderness, "sat down under a solitary broom tree." That is a poetic way of conveying how Elijah felt -- all alone like that single tree. And then Elijah's words let us look into his mood: "It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life, for I am no better than my ancestors."
Questions: God directly confronts Elijah's depression and gets him moving again. But most people who are sunk in despair -- sometimes including devout Christians -- don't receive that kind of divine intervention. What message can we take from this story for our times of despair?
What problems does God initially address that contributed to Elijah's depression (vv. 5-8)? What does Elijah's statement that "I alone am left" (vv. 10, 14) suggest about the role of loneliness in depression? What might this suggest about the causes and treatment of the condition? How does God's statement in v. 18 address Elijah's emotional state?
Psalm 42:5
Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you disquieted within me? (For context, read 42:1-11.)
The whole of Psalm 42 seems to be a meditation by a person suffering from depression. It's possible it's situational depression, for the psalmist refers to an oppressive enemy and adversaries (vv. 9-10). But we don't know if the depression was unusual for the psalmist or whether it was reoccurring.
Whatever the sort of depression, it was at that moment a real -- and painful -- experience. In fact, the psalmist alludes to pain: "My tears have been my food day and night" (v. 3).
We do note that the psalmist has not given up. Only the first half of verse 5 is quoted above, but the second half says, "Hope in God; for I shall again praise him, my help and my God." Clearly the psalmist believes that God and not depression has the last word.
Questions: How do we know when prayer is not enough to deal with our depression? Do you ask yourself tough questions in prayer? Do you listen for a voice or sign with such prayers? Are there times when you feel nothing, yet continue anyway?
Matthew 5:4
Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted. (For context, read 5:1-12.)
This is one of the beatitudes from Jesus' Sermon on the Mount. The "beatitudes are not practice advice for successful living, but prophetic declarations made on the conviction of the coming-and-already present kingdom of God," says biblical commentator Eugene Boring. This one promises a reversal of "mourning," which is sometimes part of the reality of depression.
Note that this beatitude is not a prescription for happiness, but promise of comfort for those who trust God.
Questions: In what ways is this beatitude reflected in the ministry of your church? in your outlook on life? When we call an affliction blessed, to what extent do we embrace the blessing? Do you view pain as failure?
Revelation 12:12
Rejoice then, you heavens and those who dwell in them! (For context, read 12:10-12.)
Williams stated he hoped there is laughter in heaven.
There is. (See also Luke 15:7, 10.)
In Revelation, we see suffering, but we also keep looking into heaven and realize that there is rejoicing, and all of us who suffered are just fine there.
Question: Why does it matter that there is laughter in heaven?
For Further Discussion
1. Discuss this, from TWW team member Joanna Loucky-Ramsey: "While going through multiple losses and the depression that followed it, in anguish I often asked God why he allowed it. On the other side of that dark night of the soul, I believe it taught me these things:
1) There is only one God, and you are not that person. A correct understanding of who you are and how you fit into God's creation is worth the pain God allows in your life to teach you humility.
2) Everyone has pain, whether or not it is visible to the naked eye. Grow a heart of compassion and empathy for others in the soil of your own pain, and your suffering will produce the fruit of kindness.
3) No matter what you are going through, while you cannot determine or control what happens to you, you can determine and control how you respond to those experiences. Choose to respond with gratitude for the myriad blessings you have received, great and small; with patient trust in God's faithfulness even when you cannot see the end of your difficult journey; with courage to face each day's challenges one by one, relying on the power of the Spirit of Christ who lives within you.
4) Place your pain in the hands of God and ask him to use it to make you a more effective servant. Other sufferers who never approached you before when it seemed like you never had a problem may find you more accessible because they can now believe that you might understand their pain. The adversities you endure today may be the door to a new ministry tomorrow to people desperate for a word of hope and experience of grace."
2. Respond to this, from another TWW team member: "In some cases, depression seems to be genetic. My sister was diagnosed with depression in her late teens, and I in my mid-20s. We will both likely be somewhat dependent on antidepressants for the rest of our lives. Looking back, we believe our grandmother also suffered from depression; while it might have been attributable to some of her life circumstances, it also seemed to overarch them.
"My husband also deals with depression, as does at least one, and we suspect both, of his siblings. He only got treatment at age 30 because when the condition first surfaced, he was a teen still living at home and his parents were skeptical -- as were many, still, at the time -- about it being a real medical condition.
"I was fortunate: When I told my mom that I was depressed, she assured me that there was nothing to be ashamed of. 'You wouldn't be ashamed about getting the flu or a sinus infection; this is no different. Something is out of whack in your body. If you need medicine, get it.'"
3. Comment on this, from TWW team member Frank Ramirez: "I remember a time of darkness. I called it a siege. Nothing was outwardly wrong with me or with the way I went about my ministry, but I had no doubt that this was a crisis of faith. This is all there is, a voice seemed to say, suggesting that much of what I placed my hope in was false. I didn't argue. I continued to serve God. I stayed at my post.
"The darkness lasted for much of a summer. Then came the fall, when the humidity fades, the leaves turn color and the wind blows crisp. I was driving home by myself. The sun had set, leaving an orange band along the horizon, against which a barn and a distant grove of trees stood stark. Again came the dark suggestion: This is all there is.
"In my mind, I finally answered, If this is all there is, it's enough. That was my answer: 'It's enough.'
"I felt as if the siege had lifted. No one else could have seen or heard or known that anything had happened, even if they'd been sitting in the passenger seat that night. But for me, there's never been any doubt that what I had endured was over." (Frank originally shared this in a meditation for The Upper Room, October 31, 2002.)
4. Discuss this, also from TWW team member Joanna Loucky-Ramsey: "I've suffered from depression at different times in my life. Sometimes it was situational. The worst experience I had was after a severe series of losses and transitions that led to chronic depression that lasted a few years while I lived in Alaska. During that time I continued serving in ministry, even though my Christian supervisor called me 'an unbeliever,' which was true on some level.
"Recovery was not easy. Sometimes it was all I could do to make one phone call trying to find help. If the person on the other line said there was no spot for me right then, it meant I was wiped out for the rest of the day. Sometimes I had hellish nightmares and suicidal thoughts. I had to admit to this in order to get more rapid access to treatment options.
"My recovery occurred over time in incremental, almost imperceptible baby steps. It involved a multi-faceted approach that utilized medication (antidepressants), counseling with a psychologist as well as a Christian pastoral counselor to address my crisis of faith, staying active (work), exercise, a nutritious diet, getting out of the house to socialize with people and getting a puppy, among other things. Making a few new friends who prayed for me, listened to me without judgment and let me 'borrow' their faith when I had none left of my own was another key.
"Certain phrases I learned at that time were also important: While you may not feel that your depression will ever lift and you will ever recover, many people do, and there is hope for you as well. Don't take irreversible, permanent, drastic action (such as suicide) while in the depths of depression that could be temporary, even though right now you may feel like it will never end.
"Realize that you are not God, and may not be able to change your situation or the way others behave. Let go of the desire to control others, and concentrate on what you do have control over: your own attitudes and actions. You decide how you will react to your circumstances, and take responsibility for what is within your own power to do.
"Take time to gather new tools and to sharpen old tools of coping skills to put in your tool kit. Write a list of 101 blessings you have to be thankful for, and thank God for each one. If your depression is connected to poor relationships, there may be underlying issues of unforgiveness, guilt, grief, anger, control, etc. that need to be addressed.
"Don't be too proud to ask for help if you need it. Let others (humans and/or animals) who will hold your brokenness as a sacred thing care for you. And give yourself time to heal. You didn't get hurt overnight, and healing doesn't happen overnight either; it is a process that takes time."
5. Respond to this description of a depressive episode, from Jeffery Smith, a man who also suffers from recurrent depression, and for whom mood elevating drugs do not work. This is from his book about his life with chronic depression, Where the Roots Reach for Water:
"At the office, every phone call, every home visit, every bit of documentation felt like drudgery. I was a month behind on my paperwork. At home, I'd toss my mail, the bills along with the letters, into a corner, unopened. I hadn't balanced my own checkbook for a month. A pile of overdue library books sat on my kitchen table. I drove past the public library at least once a day, but it seemed more than I could manage to call to mind the necessary foresight and lift the books off the table, and then carry them to my car, and then drop them off at the library. Any one of those steps was a challenge; accomplishing them consecutively was well-nigh impossible."
6. Jeffery Smith (see #5) describes a kind of voice inside his head, which, during depressive episodes, seemed to demand all his attention. He calls this voice "Mr. Shoulder":
"[Mr. Shoulder] moved quickly off my shoulder and wormed his way right there inside my head. Then I could hear nothing else. It was on account of Mr. Shoulder that I went dumbfounded in company, and could find nothing to say to anybody. By now he was with me loud and clear, shrill of voice, sharp of tongue, and painfully all-seeing. He would tell me who I was, and his judgment was lacerating, merciless. ... he knew my past ... as no stranger could, and nothing was too trivial to escape his notice. He gathered all this intimate data into the great sweeping arguments he used to forecast my future: at every enterprise I would fail. There was no debating him. Over and over he told me: You are haunted. You are hollow. You are beyond forgiveness and beyond hope. There is no point in vowing to change."
Can you imagine feeling like that for months or years at a time? How might you reach out to a person so afflicted? How can you help such a person hear God's word of forgiveness, hope, empowerment, mercy and "no condemnation"?
Responding to the News
To those who do not suffer from chronic depression, it may seem that depressed people are dribbling their life away. It may feel like the depressed person just needs a shove to "get moving." Mostly, though, that just shows how hard it is for someone who's not suffered from depression to understand it. So this is a good opportunity to try to deepen our understanding of the condition.
One TWW team member who is also a counselor reminds us that there are contributing factors to depression that are totally unrelated to character deficits, and that Christians are in special need to be aware of that. She says, "The 'pick yourself up by your bootstraps' is an absurdity (if you ever wore barn-boots and fell down it would become obvious how silly it is to expect a distressed person use this method)."
If you are a person suffering in silence from depression, this can be a good time to consider whether you ought to seek medical help.
Closing Prayer
Lord, be present in our minds and emotions, that we may perceive when we need help beyond ourselves and beyond our prayers to deal with the pains life brings. When we do, enable us to find the help we need. In Jesus' name. Amen

Thursday, August 7, 2014

Praying in Public: Rewarded in North Carolina Eatery, Forbidden in Georgia Mall

 © 2014 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com
If you're eating at Mary's Gourmet Diner in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and you bow your head before digging into your food, you might get a 15 percent reduction on the price of your meal.
The restaurant has been quietly giving what they call the "praying in public" discount at random for four years, but the practice just gathered widespread notice after an appreciative customer, Jordan Smith, shared on her Facebook page a photo of her receipt showing the discount. Others soon re-posted the photo, and the story made national news last week.
Smith explained that she was in Winston-Salem on a business trip and stopped at Mary's Diner for breakfast with two colleagues. The trio, who didn't know about the discount, paused for prayer before eating. After the meal, the waitress said, "Just so you know, we gave you a 15 percent discount for praying."
While the news about the diner's practice brought praise and expressions of appreciation from some who heard it, it also became a feeding ground for critics who speculated online about whether one could pray to a Wiccan goddess or say a Muslim prayer and still receive the reduced price. Others complained that the practice was discriminatory, unfair to atheists or even illegal. More than one critic argued that praying in public misses the point of Matthew 6:5 -- "And whenever you pray, do not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, so that they may be seen by others."
Mary Haglund, owner of the diner, commented on all of this on the restaurant's Facebook page, as follows:
"There's a lot of craziness going on in regard to the 15% discount. I will not respond to all the posts. I will say that it is not a 'policy.' it's a gift we give at random to customers who take a moment before their meal. This could be prayer or just a moment to breathe & push the busyness of the world away. Who you talk to or meditate on etc. is your business. I have lived in a 3rd world country[;] there are people starving. We live in a country with an abundance of beautiful food. I NEVER take that for granted. It warms my heart to see people with an attitude of gratitude. Prayer, meditation or just breathing while being grateful opens the heart chakra. It's good for everyone!!!! Thanks to my local community for your support ... you know who I am. As for all the people posting negative comments about me & my restaurant who have never met me or been to the restaurant, thanks for sharing, it's your right to speak out, just as it is mine. Peace, love & happy eating!!!!"
In sharp contrast to the practice at Mary's Gourmet Diner, a shopping mall in Dublin, Georgia, recently forbade a group of women from praying in the mall, even though they were doing so quietly. The women, who walk in the mall for fitness purposes, had formed a small prayer circle prior to having a power walk. Before they could begin their prayer, a security guard stopped them, telling them that praying in the mall was against policy. He explained that they'd had a problem with a religious group that was trying to proselytize shoppers.
Even though the women said they weren't trying to convert anyone and that their prayer was only audible within the circle, the guard would not let them proceed. The women sought out a mall manager, but he backed the guard's action. And when the women asked if people in the food court could bow their heads and pray before eating, the manager said that was not allowed either.
When the story was being prepared to run in news media, a reporter asked the mall management to comment on the incident, but the management declined to do so.
More on these stories can be found at these links:
North Carolina Restaurant Offers a 15 Percent Discount to Pray in Public. Fox News 
This Diner Gives 15% Off If You Pray Over Your Meal. HLN
Mary's Gourmet Diner. Facebook 
Women Ordered to Stop Praying Inside Mall. Fox News
The Big Questions
1. Since praying over meals is nowhere commanded in Scripture, should Christians consider doing so an obligation? Why or why not? Do you consider it an obligation? Do you say grace at home? At restaurants? At the homes of others, whether they offer prayer or not?
2. What are some reasons to pray before meals? What are some reasons you may choose not to?
3. Is there any problem with bowing your head in public in hope of receiving a reduction on your meal price? If so, what problem? If not, why not? Would you bow your head if you knew there was a chance of getting a discount? Would you deliberately not pray in public in such a circumstance? What criteria do you use regarding praying in public places?
4. Can giving the discount be a form of Christian witness on the part of the diner's owner? If so, what might be the message behind such a witness?
5. Should people who don't pray before eating at Mary's Diner feel they are being treated unjustly or inappropriately? Should the restaurant owner take their feelings into account? Why or why not? Would you feel you were treated unjustly if someone gave discounts to parents with babies? To senior citizens? To members of the military? To parents who bring children with disabilities? If you are opposed to any of these types of different treatment, do you advocate making such things illegal?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Matthew 26:26
While they were eating, Jesus took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to the disciples, and said, "Take, eat; this is my body." (For context, read 26:26-29.)
This verse is from Matthew's account of Jesus leading his disciples in the Passover meal, which was also the last time he would eat with them before his arrest and crucifixion. Jesus blesses the loaf and the cup and, in so doing, establishes a pattern of remembrance that became known as the Lord's Supper, Holy Communion or the Eucharist.
Since this particular meal had so much significance for the disciples then and continues to have significance for the church right to the present, we might think, "Well, of course, Jesus prayed at this meal. It was a special occasion. But that's no proof that he prayed at every meal, at ordinary meals." Perhaps not, but as a faithful Jew, prayer was a part of Jesus' life every day, and we can assume it was never far from any of his daily activities.
Questions: If circumstances make it difficult for you to pray before a meal, what other times do you take for communion with God? How can you pray without using words? In public, do you pray without bowing your head or moving your lips in order not to draw attention to yourself? Do you feel it is important to use outward signs of prayer as a form of witness?
Matthew 14:19-20
Then he ordered the crowds to sit down on the grass. Taking the five loaves and the two fish, he looked up to heaven, and blessed and broke the loaves, and gave them to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the crowds. And all ate and were filled ... (For context, read 14:13-20.)
When Jesus fed the 5,000, starting with only five loaves and two fish, he first blessed the food, publicly, in front of the entire crowd. In Matthew's narration of this incident, the blessing and breaking of the loaves have eucharistic overtones.
Questions: When Jesus blessed the five loaves and two fish, was he praying for a miracle? If not, what do you think was the intent of his prayer? How does the fact that Matthew includes eucharistic overtones relate both to your idea of what communion is and to what every meal might be? Do you see a difference between communion and eating together with people we love? Do you see the miraculous in communion? In a meal that is shared?
Daniel 6:10
Although Daniel knew that the document had been signed, he continued to go to his house, which had windows in its upper room open toward Jerusalem, and to get down on his knees three times a day to pray to his God and praise him, just as he had done previously. (For context, read 6:1-17.)
Matthew 6:5-6
And whenever you pray, do not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, so that they may be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward. But whenever you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you. (For context, read 6:1-8.)
The Daniel text above tells of Daniel praying three times a day -- in his own house, but where he could clearly be seen by passersby -- as was his usual practice, even though praying to anyone but the king had just been outlawed.
In Matthew 6, Jesus tells his hearers to pray privately, with the door shut.
It's possible to read these two texts simplistically and view them as contradictory. But in fact, neither one of them is about praying in public per se.
Daniel's choice to continue praying where he could be seen despite the edict against praying to anyone but the king can be seen as both a witness to his faith and an act of faithfulness to God. Further, it served as an act of nonviolent resistance to this idolatrous edict.
Jesus wasn't saying "Never pray in public." He was saying "Don't pray to be seen by others and praised for false holiness." Perhaps, if asked, he might have added, "Wherever and whenever you pray, do so to glorify God, not yourself."
Writing about the Daniel incident, biblical commentator John E. Goldingay said, "When prayer is fashionable, it is time to pray in secret (Matthew 6:5-6), but when prayer is under pressure, to pray in secret is to give the appearance of fearing the king more than God ...." (Daniel, World Biblical Commentary, 131.)
Questions: Where is prayer fashionable in your life? Where is prayer under pressure in your life? When is it an act of loving God and loving your neighbor to pray in public? When is it a violation of love for God or love for neighbor, or both, to pray in public? Should we ever pray in public when we have not been invited to do so? What about praying privately, but visibly, in public?
Luke 24:30
When [Jesus] was at the table with them, he took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. (For context, read 24:13-31.)
Acts 27:35-36
After [Paul] had said this, he took bread; and giving thanks to God in the presence of all, he broke it and began to eat. Then all of them were encouraged and took food for themselves. (For context, read 27:27-37.)
The Luke 24 verse tells of the resurrected Jesus blessing bread while at a table with the two men he'd joined on the road to Emmaus. In blessing and breaking the bread, Jesus was not establishing the Lord's Supper, as he had already done in the upper room before his crucifixion. As far as the two men at the table were concerned, this was merely the start of an ordinary evening meal, but with a guest present, whom they had not recognized as Jesus in his post-resurrection state.
Jesus' act, however, becomes a moment of spiritual vision because, in that instant, these two disciples recognize him even as he vanishes from their sight. This meal was not Holy Communion as such, but their recognition that it was Jesus who was with them made this meal suddenly holy.
In the Acts reading, Paul blesses bread after urging his shipboard companions and crew, who've been fighting a storm, to eat to help them survive a soon-to-happen shipwreck. Under such circumstances, those on board hardly considered the occasion an ordinary meal, but neither did they likely view it as a religious event. In fact, they might have considered Paul a bit "loco" for taking time to pray in the middle of a deadly storm. Still, Paul, even under crisis conditions, gives thanks to God "in the presence of all."
Questions: Jesus' table prayer was private, with just those in the room with him. Paul's prayer was public, "in the presence of all." In what sense were both prayers expressions of gratitude to God? Do these examples from Jesus and Paul set a pattern for all Christians for every meal? Only for special occasions? Only for dangerous times? Why or why not? Is there a sense in which any meal -- even a hurried one in a fast-food eatery -- can be "suddenly holy"?
1 Thessalonians 5:17
... pray without ceasing ... (For context, read 5:12-22.)
This three-word instruction is part of a longer string of advice the apostle Paul wrote to the Christians at Thessalonica about how to live faithfully as Christ's followers.
Paul couldn't have meant that they should spend every minute kneeling in prayer. More likely he meant that prayer should be an ongoing part of who they were as followers of Jesus. They should cultivate the habit of offering the things of life to God in prayer even as they were going about their daily routine.
Questions: Can you pray while interacting with others? What constitutes ceaseless prayer? How do you focus on a prayer when there are so many distractions? In what ways do you practice prayer without ceasing? Is mealtime a good reminder to pray?
For Further Discussion
1. One TWW team member commented, "I would suggest that in the United States Christianity is not so much persecuted as ignored." How is that related to today's topic? What are the ramifications of that comment for us as Christians today?
2. Comment on this: There is a rabbinical saying that to not say grace, give thanks, is to deny God what is rightfully his.
3. Read 1 Corinthians 10:23-33, and then discuss Paul's words in verses 30-31: "If I partake with thankfulness, why should I be denounced because of that for which I give thanks? So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do everything for the glory of God."
4. What do you think of the order suggested by Deuteronomy 8:10 -- "You shall eat your fill and bless the LORD your God for the good land that he has given you" -- where you eat first and pray afterward?
5. Praying, publicly or privately, can be pushed aside by crises, busyness, boredom or laziness. Is that a problem? Are there times when prayer is appropriate, and times when it is not?
6. Exodus 14:15 says, "Then the LORD said to Moses, 'Why do you cry out to me? Tell the Israelites to go forward.'" Could God be telling Moses to stop praying and get moving?
Responding to the News
This can be a good time to think about where and when you pray, and in what ways your prayers at those times and in those place honor God and your neighbor.
Closing Prayer

Be present at our table, Lord;
Be here and everywhere adored;
Thy creatures bless, and grant that we
May feast in paradise with Thee.
We thank Thee, Lord, for this our food,
For life and health and every good;
By Thine own hand may we be fed;
Give us each day our daily bread.
We thank Thee, Lord, for this our good,
But more because of Jesus' blood;
Let manna to our souls be giv'n,
The Bread of Life sent down from Heav'n.
--John Cennick (1718-1755)

Friday, August 1, 2014

'Botched' Arizona Execution Fans Death Penalty Debate

 © 2014 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com
When convicted murderer Joseph R. Wood III was executed by lethal injection in Arizona on July 23, the process took nearly two hours. Experts say that such executions typically take about 10 minutes. After the drugs were administered, Wood apparently lost consciousness, but remained alive for more than an hour and 40 minutes. The team involved in the execution reported that he was asleep and snoring during that period, while some witnesses said he struggled to breathe and moved his lips. Witnesses also reported seeing Wood gasp more than 600 times after he was declared sedated.
The medical team involved in the execution deemed Wood fully sedated at 1:57 p.m. but did not pronounce him dead until 3:49 p.m.
Wood's prolonged execution follows one in Oklahoma in April also called "botched" by some, where Clayton Lockett, convicted of murder and other crimes, writhed, groaned, convulsed and spoke during the process and attempted to rise from the execution table 14 minutes into the procedure, despite having been declared unconscious. Although the execution was stopped, Lockett died of a heart attack 43 minutes after being sedated. There have also been procedural problems with lethal injection executions in other states recently.
In both the Lockett and Wood cases, the problems in the execution process have been attributed to the drug used to sedate the inmate. Previously, a more effective anesthetic, sodium thiopental, was available, but the sole U.S. manufacturer has stopped making it, and overseas manufacturers are banned by the European Union from exporting it for purposes of execution. Using sodium thiopental, lethal injection deaths normally occur in about 10 minutes.
Groups opposed to capital punishment have made it nearly impossible for state governments to purchase known effective drugs, such as those used for euthanasia of animals, forcing them to look for other drugs.
Wood had been on death row since 1991, after he was sentenced for the 1989 killing of his ex-girlfriend and her father. He was the third inmate put to death in Arizona since last October but the first to be executed using the new combination of drugs.
Following Wood's protracted execution, Arizona governor Jan Brewer ordered a review of the process because of the length of time it took him to die. Brewer said, "One thing is certain, however: inmate Wood died in a lawful manner, and by eyewitness and medical accounts he did not suffer. This is in stark comparison to the gruesome, vicious suffering that he inflicted on his two victims -- and the lifetime of suffering he has caused their family."
Now that sodium thiopental is not an option, some people are asking whether lethal injection is constitutional under the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. If lethal injection is found unconstitutional, executions would likely revert to electrocution, firing squad, hanging or other established methods.
The problems with recent lethal injection executions have been used by some opposed to capital punishment to incite calls for elimination the death penalty altogether in the United States. It has also led some people independently to reconsider the place of executions in any form.
According to a recent Barna poll, only 5 percent of Americans think Jesus would support capital punishment. Despite that, a majority of Americans support it themselves.
More on this story can be found at these links:
Arizona Execution Lasts Nearly Two Hours ... Washington Post
Arizona Execution Takes Two Hours. BBC 
Arizona Execution Raises Questions Over Novel Lethal Injections. CNN
Everything You Need to Know About Executions in the United States. Washington Post
Would Jesus Support the Death Penalty? The Atlantic
The Big Questions
1. If you believe capital punishment to be acceptable, what are some reasons you support it? If you believe it to be unacceptable, what are some reasons you don't support it? Has your opinion on the death penalty changed over the years? What fueled that change -- something that directly impacted your life? personal study? observation of societal events?
2. In what ways does your understanding of Christianity affect your view of capital punishment? What guidance does the Bible give on the subject? What guidance does your denomination give on the subject? Is Christianity a set of rules we follow to please God or something God does for us?
3. Do you differentiate between God's commands for your own behavior and God's purposes for government? If so, how?
4. What bearing should the frequency of false convictions and unequal access to legal resources have on our position as Christians about capital punishment?
5. Might your feelings about capital punishment change if the victim of someone on death row were a member of your family? Might your feelings change if the person on death row were a member of your family? Might your feelings change if you were an employee of the criminal justice system and part of your job was to help carry out executions? Should these feelings make a difference? Why?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Exodus 21:14
But if someone willfully attacks and kills another by treachery, you shall take the killer from my altar for execution. (For context, read 21:12-27.)
This command from the Law of Moses is straightforward and appears reasonable. Assuming you don't oppose capital punishment in principle, and assuming there's no question about the guilt, intent and identity of the perpetrator, this "life for a life" practice seems quite defensible.
But if you read it in the context of its surrounding verses, you may come to a different conclusion. The very next verse, for example, reads "Whoever strikes father or mother shall be put to death" (v. 15). Do you find that defensible as well? If your rebellious teenager were to hit you, would you want him or her put to death?
Verses 20-21 of the context specify that if the person who is hit and dies is a slave and the attacker is the slave's owner, that owner shall be "punished," but there's no mention of a death penalty. And even for the owner to receive that unspecified punishment, the slave has to die right away. If "the slave survives a day or two, there is no punishment; for the slave is the owner's property," says verse 21.
The laws in Exodus applied to the Israelites in the context of being God's chosen people. While the use of a specific punishment commanded by God for that age might still apply today, the specific crimes for which it is allowed might differ.
Question: How do the commands about the death penalty in the fuller context of the Law of Moses affect your willingness to use the Old Testament as a guide for capital punishment decisions today? Before answering, consider the following verses, which are from that larger Law of Moses context:
*Exodus 22:20 - Whoever sacrifices to any god, other than the LORD alone, shall be devoted to destruction.
*Exodus 35:2 -  Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a holy sabbath of solemn rest to the LORD; whoever does any work on it shall be put to death.
*Leviticus 20:10 - If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death.
*Leviticus 24:16 - One who blasphemes the name of the LORD shall be put to death; the whole congregation shall stone the blasphemer.
*Deuteronomy 21:18-19, 21- If someone has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey his father and mother, who does not heed them when they discipline him, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his town ... Then all the men of the town shall stone him to death.
Exodus 20:13
Thou shalt not kill. (KJV). You shall not murder. (NRSV, NIV). (For context, read 20:1-17.)
We've quoted this verse from the Ten Commandments from three versions of the Bible. The older King James Version translates the underlying Hebrew word as "kill," while both the New Revised Standard Version and the New International Version render it "murder." In fact, Hebrew scholars tell us that both translations are correct; the Hebrew word can mean either "kill" or "murder." And we note that the Common English Bible, the newest version we are aware of, has gone back to "kill."
The word chosen would seem to make a difference, for if the meaning is that we should not murder, then killing in battle or self-defense or as punishment for a capital offense are not necessarily prohibited. If, however, the meaning is kill, then possibly none of the life-takings mentioned in the last sentence are allowed. Still, since other sections of Exodus mandate capital punishment for crimes, this commandment probably was not intended to prohibit capital punishment by governing authorities, but rather killing by individuals acting in their private capacity.
Many Bible scholars interpret the command as declaring that human life belongs to God and therefore must be respected, while still allowing certain actions to protect one's life from threat.
Despite the lack of clarity about the full intent of the word, this commandment has served humanity well, and respect for human life has grown because of it. Even when someone has claimed an overriding religious, political or moral justification for murder, most students of the Ten Commandments have maintained that that person is wrong and guilty of both sin and breaking the law of society.
Questions: In what ways can this commandment serve as a foundational principle to help us decide about the morality of capital punishment? What, in your opinion, is the difference between killing and murder? What difference should there be in punishment? Who determines the difference between killing and murder? Have you ever sat on a jury in such a case? What happened?
Ecclesiastes 3:1, 3
For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven: ... a time to kill, and a time to heal ... (For context, read 3:1-8.)
We can understand this "time to kill" statement to mean that the writer of Ecclesiastes did support the ending of someone's life under certain circumstances. However, the fuller statement -- "a time to kill, and a time to heal" -- seems to give society two ways to respond to an individual's sin. Under some circumstances, some kind of restoration -- healing -- of the person is preferable to killing him or her.
Questions: Under what circumstances, if any, should some form of restoration be applied instead of a death penalty to a person who has been found guilty of a capital offense? Is it possible that in speaking about a time to kill, the writer was referring to something other than the slaying of a human being -- perhaps slaughtering an animal for food or euthanizing a suffering animal out of compassion? When the author speaks of time for various things, does that necessarily mean he approves of them, or could he simply be acknowledging that "stuff happens"?
Romans 13:3-4
For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Do you wish to have no fear of the authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive its approval; for it is God's servant for your good. But if you do what is wrong, you should be afraid, for the authority does not bear the sword in vain! It is the servant of God to execute wrath on the wrongdoer. (For context, read 13:1-7.)
The apostle Paul here acknowledges the duty of legitimate government to "bear the sword" to "execute wrath on the wrongdoer." This bearing of the sword can be understood as execution. Paul declares legitimate government "the servant of God."
Questions: To what degree should the moral convictions of citizens be reflected in the actions of government? Why? To what degree should people use government to impose their morality on others? Is it possible for any government to dispense God's justice perfectly?
John 8:3-5
The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery; and making her stand before all of them, they said to him, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the very act of committing adultery. Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" (For context, read 8:2-11.)
The motives of the scribes and Pharisees in bringing a woman caught in adultery to Jesus weren't pure; they were hoping to put Jesus on the spot. In addition, since they were not representatives of the legitimate government, in raising the question about whether she should be stoned to death, they were putting forward a lynch-mob situation.
Jesus refused to condemn the woman. He neither denied Scripture nor argued with their point, but he did change the ground of the argument, by saying, "Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her" (v. 7).
Questions: Can we draw from this incident any generalities about what Jesus might say about executions in the United States today? Why or why not? How should we apply, if at all, Jesus' statement to the woman's accusers to ourselves?
Matthew 5:38-39
You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also ... (For context, read 5:38-48.)

Jesus was probably not thinking about capital punishment when he made this statement, and he was likely talking about personal interactions, not government policies, but the spirit of what he says here -- turning the other cheek, etc. -- sounds quite different from "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth."
Question: How might this statement from Jesus contribute to a discussion about the death penalty?
For Further Discussion

1. Respond to this, from the Atlantic article in the links above: "Jesus, most of the Apostles, and most of the early martyrs of the faith were victims of inconsistent justice systems that allowed for capital punishment. Many Christians strangely believe that Jesus wouldn't support the death penalty even though they do. As this issue moves back to the fore of American public life, they will have to rectify this inconsistency and determine if they can take the position they believe Jesus would."
2. As a group, evaluate these arguments for and against capital punishment (from Michael D. O'Reilley, writing in the Napa Valley Register):
"Opponents of the death penalty argue: (a) it is not a deterrent because most people who commit murder do so impulsively in moments of passion or anger; (b) it endorses killing and brutality; (c) it causes excessive suffering to the offender; (d) there is a risk innocent persons may be executed.
"Supporters contend: (a) homicides committed impulsively are voluntary manslaughter, but the death penalty applies only to first degree murder; (b) while there never may be conclusive evidence the death penalty is a deterrent, it is justified because it does not have to deter everyone in order to deter someone; further, anyone not deterred by a death sentence certainly would not be deterred by a life sentence; (c) it does not endorse killing and brutality any more than arrests and fines encourage kidnapping or theft; (d) punishment is meant to be bad, and the victim did not deserve to suffer; and (e) it is possible innocent people may have been or will be executed, but almost all human conduct can cost the lives of innocent people, such as car crashes, and we still engage in these activities."
3. Check online or in denominational policy literature to see if your denomination has a position statement on capital punishment. If so, read the statement to the class and discuss it together.
4. There is some evidence that because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases, carrying out a death penalty sentence is more expensive than life without parole. Whether that's always true or not, should cost considerations be a factor in deciding whether to have the death penalty as a possible judicial sentence?
5. Discuss this: Roger Sales, in his book Christopher Marlowe, writes, "A Renaissance execution was meant to represent what Foucault ('The Spectacle of the Scaffold') calls a theatre of Hell. Agony had to be prolonged for as long as possible so that both the victim and the spectators were given a glimpse of the everlasting torments associated with Hell. The point that an execution represented not an end but, rather, merely the prelude to endless torture was reinforced by the way in which the spectacle continued after the eventual death of the victim ...." Sales also quotes Foucault that these executions were "not eventually stopped out of humanitarian concern, but rather because there were doubts about whether such displays of power fulfilled their function of coercing all of these spectators all the time."
6. Respond to this, from a TWW team member: When Jesus tells us to "love our neighbor as we love our self," he is quoting Leviticus 19:18, which reads in full, "You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD." Clearly God excludes vengeance from how we should behave toward others. Thus, even in cases of capital punishment, vengeance is not meant to be a part of the purpose (though there seems to be some of that ugliness in the debate on the death penalty). That is the reason why the family of the victim does not serve on the jury, and though they may testify at some point, it is society, and not the clan, which exacts justice.
7. Comment on this, from TWW team member Frank Ramirez: "I'm reminded about the scripture that says we have to kill all the Amalekites. I asked my Old Testament prof about this passage. He replied that according to the Talmud, if you believed you had found an Amalekite, you were to go to your rabbi, who would tell you this person was no such thing, and we were then under no obligation to kill such a person."
8. Respond to this: Frodo (the primary protagonist of The Lord of the Rings) mentions that he feels no pity for Gollum and says, "Now at any rate he is as bad as an Orc, and just an enemy. He deserves death." Gandalf replies, "Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. For even the very wise cannot see all ends."
Responding to the News
You might wish to add your voice to those of others in efforts to guide governments in deciding the future of capital punishment in America.
Closing Prayer
Help us, O Lord, to see clearly how you would have us deal as a society with those among us who commit capital crimes. And then let our voices be part of what shapes law as society wrestles with this difficult issue. In Jesus' name. Amen.