Thursday, June 28, 2012

Sandusky's Church Deals With His Criminal Conviction


Until Jerry Sandusky was arrested in February on charges of sexually molesting eight young boys, he and his wife Dottie had been regular attendees at St. Paul's United Methodist Church in State College, Pennsylvania, rarely missing a Sunday service. For his fellow church members, the charges against Sandusky seemed out of character with the man they thought they knew. From that time through Sandusky's conviction this week on 45 counts related to predatory sexual crimes against boys, the congregation has had to come to terms not only with the moral disconnect between Sandusky's public and private life, but also with how to respond as a community of faith.

Glimpses of two Sunday services at St. Paul's this year show that the congregation is not ducking the issue.

In February, three weeks after Sandusky's arrest, Dana Garrett, a senior producer at CNN, showed up for a Sunday service at the church. When she identified herself as a CNN producer, a man greeting people at the door told her the media was not invited but, after some conversation, said that, yes, she was welcome to worship with them.

During a ritual called "passing the peace," in which attendees extend wishes of God's peace to one another, the man who'd initially met Garrett at the church door greeted her again, warmly, and brought the pastor, Ed Zeiders, to meet her. Zeiders greeted her as well and told the man to "make sure she gets mugged." Garrett didn't know what to make of that, especially because CNN and other network satellite trucks had been vandalized on the Penn State campus while covering the emerging scandal. She was relieved, however, when the man presented her with a coffee mug bearing the church's name. Inside it, she found a card with the church's service schedule and a message reading, "Do you know that God's love can and does achieve great things, even amid the turmoil of today's world?"

In his sermon that day, Zeiders did not mention Sandusky by name, but he clearly told that congregation that the only way to respond to the tumult swirling around the community was by being "authentic" Christians, with love and without judgment, for the victims and for the accused. "We are entrusted with the light of the world," Zeiders told his congregation. "We are the bearer of each other's burdens ... [called to] care for each other as deeply as we can."

After the service, Garrett spoke with Zeiders and learned that he was in regular pastoral contact with Sandusky and his wife. She asked if, assuming the charges were true, Sandusky should be forgiven. Zeiders immediately said yes, but added that forgiving did not mean forgetting and that people should be held accountable.

Garrett also talked with some parishioners, some of whom admitted to being in a state of shock regarding Sandusky. He had not been back to church since the charges, but as the allegations were still unproven, Garrett asked if they would welcome him back in the meantime. She was told that perhaps half the congregation would.

Garrett concluded her report of her visit saying, "... despite the upheaval and torment in this parish family, they were still willing to welcome a stranger who they may have at first viewed with suspicion. I came as just a member of the intruding media. I left there having received peace, the body and blood, a warm embrace, a mug and a better appreciation for the anguish that is being felt in every fiber of this community."

Last Sunday, with Sandusky now convicted and incarcerated, Garrett visited St. Paul's again. She heard Zeiders address the conviction, asking the congregation to "pray for all those who are victims and for all of those who are predators."

Zeiders began his sermon with a question: "In light of the misery, sorrow and suffering we see, affecting every aspect of our life, within us, in the midst of us and around us -- what are we to do? The world needs an answer, our community deserves an answer, and we need to answer together what is the most efficacious way to move forward from here."

He went on to say that in the midst of this "storm," the church had an opportunity: "If ever a local congregation has been given a moment to ... reveal what it means to be Christian," Zeiders said, "this is that congregation in this moment in history."

Zeiders then spoke about the transformative power and saving grace of God, making a connection between faith and ethical behavior. "If we are to claim Jesus as Savior, we must, without fail, come face-to-face with our own morality." He said that Christians must not succumb to the idea that "my faith and my morality are solely my business."

The congregation is still working to mesh the Sandusky they saw in church with the Sandusky revealed in the courtroom. Garrett reported that one member said, "We are like a family, and the allegations were stunning. I didn't want to believe them, but there was too much evidence not to."

The service last Sunday included a baptism. Afterward, Zeiders asked his congregants to vow to "guard and protect" children, reminding them they were stewards of their safety.

There is no indication that Sandusky ever abused a child within the church. The United Methodist denomination has a well-regarded child-protection program called Safe Sanctuaries with proactive protocols to ensure that children are kept from harm while under the care of the church.

Zeiders continues to be in pastoral contact with both Jerry and Dottie Sandusky.
 
More on this story can be found at these links:

Sandusky's Pastor Addresses Conviction From Pulpit. CNN
Can God's Love Be Enough? Inside Sandusky's Church. HLN
Safe Sanctuaries. General Board of Discipleship (UMC)
 
The Big Questions
1. How is it possible for someone to sit weekly under the teaching of the church and continue to commit acts that are directly opposite those teachings? While in Sandusky's case, the wrongdoing was criminal, in what less extreme ways do we behave in opposition to what our Sunday worship teaches? Why? Are there times when the sermon or service makes you uncomfortable with your own failings? Should it?

2. How should a church respond to a member who is revealed to have sinned in a stomach-turning and/or criminal way? Is your answer different if the person has not admitted the wrongdoing (as Sandusky has not)? How should a church respond to members of that person's family? Is it better to address families affected by such circumstances in private or in public? Is it better to leave such issues unaddressed in order to prevent discomfort or conflict?

3. What does it mean to be an "authentic" Christian in such circumstances?

4. What measures help a congregation heal after its "family" nature has been fractured by the significant sin of a member?

5. What proactive protocols are in place in your church to protect children from predators?

Confronting the News with Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

2 Samuel 13:20

"Her brother Absalom said to her, 'Has Amnon your brother been with you? Be quiet for now, my sister; he is your brother; do not take this to heart.' So Tamar remained, a desolate woman, in her brother Absalom's house." (For context, read 13:1-29.)

King David's son Amnon raped his half-sister Tamar, which, of course, left her devastated. Tamar's full-brother, Absalom, made plans to avenge his sister, but only told her to "Be quiet for now ... do not take this to heart," which was terrible advice for a victim of a sex-offender. It left her "a desolate woman." Even David, upon learning of the wrongdoing of one of his children against another of his children, did not bring any penalty upon Amnon.

All of this festered, and it led to Absalom murdering Amnon and to other problems in David's family and in the kingdom.

In times past, even the church has sometimes treated sexual offenses within its sphere by looking the other way or by asking victims to "be quiet." Thankfully, most church groups no longer do this, but congregations still have great difficulty facing the fact that sexual predators or doers of other great wrongs could be among them.
Questions: In what ways does your congregation guard against asking victims of sexual offenders within the church to "be quiet" about the harm done to them? Is there a forum or place within the life of your church where there is a time for lamentation? How comfortable are you or your congregation with deep expressions of emotion?

Ezekiel 33:6

"But if the sentinel sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, so that the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any of them, they are taken away in their iniquity, but their blood I will require at the sentinel's hand." (For context, read 33:1-9.)

God called the prophet Ezekiel to be Israel's spiritual "sentinel" to warn the people of judgment to come. As long the sentry did his job and faithfully warned the people, there was no blame on the sentry, even if the people did not heed his warnings. But if the sentry did not issue the warnings, then God would hold him responsible for the fate of the people.

In a sense, congregations need to be "sentinels" for the well-being of their members and attendees when they are in the sphere of the church's responsibility.
Questions: In what ways is your congregation a sentinel for its children? its youth? its adults? its senior members? Do you publish a notice about the policies for child-protection in your church? If these things are left unsaid or just assumed, should that be changed?

Matthew 13:29-30

"But he replied, 'No; for in gathering the weeds you would uproot the wheat along with them. Let both of them grow together until the harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Collect the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.'" (For context, read 13:24-30.)

These are the concluding lines from Jesus' parable of the weeds among the wheat. Jesus told this parable to reveal something about the kingdom of heaven as it exists on earth. Its membership is a mix of wheat and weeds -- genuine Christians and those who only seem to be so. For our purposes, we note that the parable accepts that such is the way it is, that the "sorting" will have to wait until harvest time, the final judgment.

That's helpful news, for it relieves us of the task of trying to figure out who is a "wheat" person and who is a "weed" person -- except when actual behavior reveals that a person is other than who that person appears to be. In the meantime, we should put the "sentinel" protocols into place.
Questions: In what ways can premature judgments cause harm to a community of believers? In what ways can deferred judgments allow bad situations to continue? How do we decide when to act? What does it mean to leave judgment to God, yet be proactive and faithful in protecting members of the congregation? Is it possible to allow individuals such as predators in some worship settings, yet maintain boundaries of safety? (For one answer, see "Further Discussion #1 below.)

Romans 7:22-23

"For I delight in the law of God in my inmost self, but I see in my members another law at war with the law of my mind, making me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members." (For context, read 7:14-25.)

Paul here speaks of an inner conflict -- what we might call a "divided self," a person at war with himself. Part of him wants and wills that which is God-pleasing. Part of him wants what is self-pleasing even if that flies in face of what is God-pleasing.

When someone who is living in great wrongdoing, even criminal wrongdoing, also attends church, it's possible that such a person is merely using their church connection as "cover" for their sin/crime. We recall, for example, that the BTK killer was an active member of a Lutheran church and had been elected president of the church board. It's always possible, however, that such a person is genuinely drawn both to Christianity and to his or her evil practice. Paul found the solution to his divided self in what he called "walking according to the Spirit" (Romans 8:4-5). He was, of course, referring to the Holy Spirit, the indwelling power of God. The biggest difference that makes is that the overriding motivation and guidance the person in the Spirit receives is not from his or her human nature but from God. Thus, walking in the Spirit, we can live in a way that is pleasing to God, and life-giving to ourselves and others.

Sometimes, when we speak of being "converted" or "born again" or "deciding to follow Jesus," we are thinking only of a moment in which we change direction, but of course, that is but a beginning. Paul here talks about walking in the Spirit as allowing that moment of change to blossom into a way of life. Walking in the Spirit means that we listen to God's direction within us, and that's like having an internal sentinel.

It's always possible that a person's divided self is pathological, which may preclude any real inner struggle, but many wrongdoers also feel the pull of righteousness.
Questions: When we feel pulled both ways, how can we give "walking according to the Spirit" the edge over "walking according to the flesh"? Should understanding our own sinful nature shape the way we treat or prejudge others? Is safety of those for whom we are stewards more important than inclusion?

Ephesians 6:18

"Pray in the Spirit at all times in every prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert and always persevere in supplication for all the saints." (No additional context needed.)

"Saints" as used by Paul in this verse refers not to especially holy people, but to believers in Christ -- in effect, church members. Most of us are good about praying for our fellow members when they are sick or have some obvious calamity, but Paul is here talking about praying for them in general, which would include supplications for their spiritual well-being. He was aware that simply being part of the church was no guarantee of spiritual health.
Question: What spiritual matter might you want others to pray about on your behalf?

For Further Discussion
1. We know of a church where an adult member admitted to the pastor that he felt sexually drawn toward children. He said he had never acted on that impulse, so there was nothing for the pastor to report to authorities, but the man also said that he wanted to continue to attend the church. The pastor agreed that he could, but only if the man would agree to having a small support group of men informed about his predilection toward children and allow a volunteer from that group to stay with him in church each Sunday -- including when the man used the restroom. Also, he was to consider the children's-ministry parts of the building off limits. The man agreed, and the arrangement has worked successfully, with the volunteers considering their time with this man as part of their personal ministries. What do you think of this arrangement? Should something different have been done? Why?

2. Tell why you agree or disagree with this statement (summarized from various sources): When a church member is a sexual predator, the wrongdoing itself is his or her own sin. But if other church members learn of it and do nothing, it becomes an institutional sin as well. It is also an institutional sin when the church has put no safeguards in place.

Responding to the News


This is a good time to review what proactive child-protection protocols your congregation has in place.  

Other News This Week
Mob Mentality on a School Bus, and on a Donor Website

In a 10-minute video posted on YouTube by a middle schooler, entitled "Making the Bus Monitor Cry," four 7th graders taunt 23-year-veteran-school bus monitor Karen Klein, saying, "You don't have a family because they all killed themselves because they didn't want to be near you." (Klein's son committed suicide 10 years ago.) One boy pokes Klein's arm with a book, saying if he were to stab her, his knife would go through her "like butter."

Reaction to the video, which has gone viral, was immediate and overwhelming. Overnight, written apologies were issued by the boys, who have received death threats and face possible suspension from school for the coming school year.

Over $650,000 poured in to an online website from 29,000 individual donors across the globe to fund vacation trips and an early retirement for the 68-year-old grandmother of eight, who refused to press charges. "I feel kinda bad for them and their families because of what's going on," she said. "They're being harassed terribly, and I don't like that. I don't want any harm to come to them."

Humanity, Twain wrote, is "governed by minorities, seldom or never by majorities. It suppresses its feelings and its beliefs and follows the handful that makes the most noise. Sometimes the noisy handful is right, sometimes wrong; but no matter, the crowd follows it."

Commentator Alexandra Petri wrote: "The Internet creates mobs just as surely as the backs of buses. It is simply that the mob can swing both ways. The test of character is not what you do when no one is watching. It is what you do when everyone is watching. It's as Twain said. For every noisy handful there are 29,000 who are kind -- or would be. If only you could remember this on the bus, at the time. If only they weren't so quiet. In the meantime, we're all sorry."

The links:

Karen Klein the Bus Monitor and the Noisy Handful. Washington Post

Bullying and the Limits of "Turn the Other Cheek." Christianity Today
Bullied Bus Monitor Thankful for Support, Pleads for Threats to Stop. Yahoo! News
Karen Klein Responds to Apologies, Says Boys "Can Do Better." Huffington Post
On Bullying: Resources and Questions for Writing or Discussion. New York Times

Some Questions and Bible Verses
1. Have you ever been the target of a bully? Describe that experience. How did you handle the situation? How did the experience change you?

2. Have you ever bullied someone? How did the experience change you?

3. Have you ever witnessed someone being cruel or mean to someone who was different? How did you react? Did you do anything about it? Why or why not? What were the consequences of your action or inaction? Have you witnessed "people being mean or cruel" online? Have you joined in? Is it easier to gossip or bully online than it would be face-to-face with the victim? How can the use of social media "echo and amplify" bullying? Do you agree with the statement "There is no such thing as an innocent bystander when it comes to bullying"?

4. How do the following Scriptures apply?

"First of all you must understand this, that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and indulging their own lusts." (2 Peter 3:3)
"Happy are those who do not follow the advice of the wicked, or take the path that sinners tread, or sit in the seat of scoffers ..." (Psalm 1:1)
"Now the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowds to ask for Barabbas and to have Jesus killed. ... All of them said, 'Let him be crucified!' Then he asked, 'Why, what evil has he done?' But they shouted all the more, 'Let him be crucified!'" (Matthew 27:20-23)

4. Can a bully learn empathy? Is there hope for a bully to be transformed? What is a suitable punishment for a bully? Being required to apologize to your victim? Suspension from school? Death?

"Scoffers do not like to be rebuked; they will not go to the wise." (Proverbs 15:12)
"Condemnation is ready for scoffers, and flogging for the backs of fools." (Proverbs 19:29)

5. "Just as disturbing as these cruel taunts ... is that Klein never responds. An adult with the clear authority in the situation (ironically, bus monitors are hired precisely to stop bullies), Klein stays seated, eventually crying," Katelyn Beaty observed in Christianity Today. "I wonder ... if Klein sat passively because she had come to believe, somewhere along the way, that good people 'rise above' extreme personal offense and brush off insults. Or, in Christian parlance, that they 'turn the other cheek.' Biblical scholars understand Jesus' command as a warning against letting anger and the urge to retaliate consume a victim of mistreatment. Explicitly countering the 'eye for an eye' teaching his original listeners know well, Jesus is outlawing revenge. ... But self-defense and revenge are not the same. Unlike revenge, which lowers the victim's dignity to the level of the abuser, self-defense preserves the victim's dignity, showing the abuser that the victim won't stoop to their level or passively forbear such evil. Instead, the victim becomes a person with agency -- the kind of person God created him or her to be -- who loves herself enough to refuse such hatred." What options did Klein have that she did not exercise on the school bus that might have resulted in a different outcome?

6. What does the following Scripture mean in a situation like this?

"You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile." (Matthew 5:38-41)

Closing Prayer


We pray, O Lord, for all victims of sexual abuse, that they may find fullness of life beyond the abuse. We pray, O Lord, for all sexual abusers, that they might find the will and strength to desist. We pray, O Lord, for all victims of bullies, that they may not be damaged by the bullying. We pray, O Lord, for all bullies, that they may find constructive uses for their power. We pray, O Lord, for churches, that they may be safe sanctuaries of healing and hope. In Jesus' name. Amen.
 
Copyright 2012 Communication Resources

Friday, June 22, 2012

Daredevil Walks Tightrope Across Niagara Falls


The Wired Word for the Week of June 24, 2012

In the News

 
Nik Wallenda recently traveled from the United States to Canada, crossing the border at Niagara Falls. Such a trip happens countless times every day, and travelers who enter Canada by one of three bridges are always required to present their passports to customs agents.

"What is the purpose of your trip, sir?" asked the customs agent at the border. "To inspire people around the world," Wallenda replied. His trip was inspirational because he performed it on a tightrope instead of a bridge, becoming the first person in history to cross the falls in that manner.

The 33-year-old daredevil walked a cable that was dripping with spray from Niagara Falls as 100,000 people watched his stunt from the ground. The feat was broadcast on live television, so millions more were able to listen to the prayers he said into a microphone as he made his way across the falls.

Wallenda is a member of the seventh generation of the famous Flying Wallendas, a family that has performed numerous death-defying high-wire acts since they started as a group of travelling acrobats in Austria-Hungary in the 1700s. Their risk-taking has sometimes resulted in death, as when Nik Wallenda's great-grandfather Karl died in a fall in Puerto Rico in 1978.

Although the Niagara Gorge had been crossed by tightrope over a century ago, Nik Wallenda's crossing was the first over the actual falls. On the morning of the walk, there was a carnival atmosphere on the American side of the falls, with "Tightrope Tailgate" T-shirts available for sale, along with small chocolate replicas of a barrel to commemorate the vehicle once used by Annie Edson Taylor to go over the falls -- a feat she survived. "I'm so excited we have a real daredevil," said the Niagara Falls resident who was selling the chocolate barrels.

Wallenda started on the American side at a little after 10 p.m., in mist so thick that he could not be seen from the Canadian side. His high-wire walk took about half an hour and was televised by ABC. The New York Times reported that it "had an Old Testament feel to it."

Moving slowly along the 1800-foot wire, red-shirted Wallenda appeared to float above the thunderous waters beneath him, and as he neared the end he was greeted by the roar of the crowd in Canada. He pumped his fist, ran a few steps to the end of the tightrope and embraced his family. Then he called his 84-year-old grandmother to assure her of his safety.

Ten-year-old Erik Churuk was part of a group of seven children who had been watching and chanting, "Let's go, Nik, let's go!" Said Churuk, "He should be part of history."

Reflecting on the crossing, Wallenda said he felt a sense of peace, but also struggled to focus on the wire beneath him. "It was absolutely amazing to have that view," he said. Although in other tightrope walks he had been able to focus on the cable underneath him and follow the movement of the cable with his body, there was no way to do this over Niagara Falls. He said, "If I looked down at the cable there was water moving everywhere, and if I looked up, there was heavy mist."

Because of the danger of the feat, ABC required that he wear a safety harness, which would have saved his life if he had fallen. ABC had invested $1.3 million in the event and clearly wanted it to be successful. Wind and water whipped at Wallenda as he crossed the falls, and at the halfway point he said, "I'm strained, I'm drained … This is so physical, not only mental but physical … My hands are going numb. I feel like I'm getting weak." But he persevered and made it to the end of the tightrope, where his wife and three children were waiting for him. "I am so blessed," he concluded. "How blessed I am to have the life that I have."

Wallenda is already the holder of six Guinness World Records, including the longest and highest bicycle ride on a tightrope. Last year, he completed the walk that killed his great-grandfather Karl, on a high wire stretched between two towers of the 10-storey Condado Plaz Hotel in Puerto Rico.

At one point in his Niagara walk, Nik thought about his great-grandfather and the walks he had taken, and considered this walk over the falls to be a "tribute to my ancestors and my hero, Karl Wallenda." He described his crossing of Niagara as a dream come true, and said, "I hope what I do and what I just did inspires people around the world to reach for the skies."

A member of the Buffalo-Niagara Film Board told ABC News, "Over one billion people by Monday will have known the story of Nik Wallenda over Niagara Falls." The next stop for Wallenda is unknown, but he already has permits in place to become the first person to cross the Grand Canyon on a high wire.

More on this story can be found at these links:


The Big Questions
1. Nik Wallenda claimed that the purpose of his high-wire walk was "to inspire people around the world." How is such a feat inspirational? Or not?

2. What is an appropriate prayer to offer during a dangerous act? What kind of protection does God offer when we take risks? Is there anything we do -- or don’t do -- that is not taking a risk?

3. Describe the difference between taking a risk for God's glory and taking a risk for our own glory. Where is God's will done?

4. A tightrope walk across Niagara Falls is clearly an example of perseverance. Where are we challenged to persevere in daily life? How does the Holy Spirit help us?

5. What can we do to inspire others to "reach for the skies" and participate in the work of God?

6. Wallenda was required to wear a safety harness to preserve his life. What is our "safety harness" when we take a risk for Jesus Christ?  


Confronting the News with Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Joshua 2:1

"Then Joshua son of Nun sent two men secretly from Shittim as spies, saying, 'Go, view the land, especially Jericho.' So they went, and entered the house of a prostitute whose name was Rahab, and spent the night there." (For context, read 2:1-24.)

Preparing for the invasion of the Promised Land, Joshua sends two spies into the city of Jericho. They enter the house of a prostitute named Rahab and stay with her, and their presence becomes known to the king of Jericho, who demands that Rahab turn them over to him. She hides the men, having come to believe that the Lord had given the land to the people of Israel. Rahab asks the men for protection for her family in the coming invasion, and then helps them to escape the city of Jericho.
Questions: What risk did the two spies take, and when are we called upon to take similar risks? Why was Rahab the harlot motivated to do what she did, and how does her brave action inspire us today?

2 Samuel 10:12

"Be strong, and let us be courageous for the sake of our people, and for the cities of our God; and may the LORD do what seems good to him." (For context, read 10:9-14.)

Facing an attack from the Ammonites and the Arameans, David's commander Joab divides his soldiers into two groups, one to fight the Ammonites and one to fight the Arameans. He encourages each group to support the other if either the Ammonites or the Arameans become too strong. Joab then encourages them all with his words about being strong and courageous for the sake of their people and God's cities, and he turns the situation over to the Lord. When the battle begins, the Arameans flee, followed by the Ammonites.
Questions: What risk did Joab take in the face of a threat from the Arameans and the Ammonites? What can we learn from his focus on fighting for the sake of the people and God's cities, and his willingness to allow the Lord to "do what seems good to him"?
Daniel 3:16-18
"Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego answered the king, 'O Nebuchadnezzar, we have no need to present a defense to you in this matter. If our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the furnace of blazing fire and out of your hand, O king, let him deliver us. But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods and we will not worship the golden statue that you have set up.'" (For context, read Daniel 3:13-30.)

King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon demands that everyone worship a golden statue that he has set up, but three Israelites refuse. The consequence of refusing to worship the statue is sure death in a furnace of blazing fire. When Nebuchadnezzar becomes furious at the three, he orders them thrown into the furnace, where they are not even singed. This miracle causes the king to bless the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, and promote them in the province of Babylon.
Questions: How do the three Israelites conduct themselves in the face of the danger of the fiery furnace? Why are they willing to take the risk they do? How did God protect them? What lessons does this story contain for us?

Luke 9:1-2

"Then Jesus called the twelve together and gave them power and authority over all demons and to cure diseases, and he sent them out to proclaim the kingdom of God and to heal." (For context, read 9:1-6.)

Jesus sends his twelve disciples on a mission to drive out demons, cure diseases and proclaim the kingdom of God. He challenges them to take nothing for their mission, and to depend on the hospitality of strangers. They end up going through the villages, sharing the good news and curing diseases everywhere.
Questions: What powers did Jesus give his disciples, and where do we see such power today? Why did Jesus challenge them to take nothing for their mission, and what could it mean for us to do our work without a "safety harness" today? When have you stepped out in faith, as the twelve disciples did, and what happened?

Romans 8:26

"Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but that very Spirit intercedes with sighs too deep for words." (For context, read 8:18-30.)

Paul knows that the present time is full of suffering, and encourages us to face our challenges with hope and patience. He also promises the help of the Holy Spirit, who "intercedes for the saints according to the will of God" (8:27) and assures us that "all things work together for good for those who love God" (8:28).
Question: In a trying time, how have you felt the Holy Spirit helping you in your weakness? What enabled you to persevere? Where have you discovered the will of God in a time of risk and challenge? Describe how "all things work together for good," even in difficult circumstances.

For Further Discussion
1. Nik Wallenda has been described as a "daredevil," which means being a reckless person who enjoys doing dangerous things. Is there a sense in which he is literally "daring the devil"? How would you justify such an action?  

2. What are some of the risks you are willing to take for the glory of God and the advancement of his kingdom?

3. Discuss the importance of prayer in risky situations, even if we, along with the apostle Paul, "do not know how to pray as we ought" (Romans 8:26)? Is it enough to pray for protection, or should we pray for something else?

4. Where do you see Christians today performing actions that are truly inspiring? How can you take part?

5. The spies who entered Jericho escaped with their lives, as did the three Israelites in the fiery furnace. But some people of faith die as they serve the Lord. What is the value of their risky actions?

6. Jesus said, "Those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it" (Mark 8:35). How would you apply this saying to your life today?

Responding to the News


Think about taking a risk for the kingdom of God this week. Consider an act of Christian ministry or mission that is "outside your comfort zone," and make a commitment to perform it. Discuss it with family and friends, pray about it and then do it!

Other News This Week
Wildfires in the West and Around the World

High temperatures, low snow-pack, high winds and lightning strikes with little rainfall are blamed for wildfires that have devastated at least seven states in the western United States. Hundreds of homes have been destroyed with thousands more threatened; cost estimates are $17.2 million in Colorado alone.

Pam Skinner, a resident of Los Alamos, New Mexico, wrote in an email June 16, 2012: "The fire here [in central New Mexico] burned 224 homes ... The other fire close to here is now up to 197,000 acres. The smoke from that fire is visible all the way into Texas even though the fire is burning closer to Arizona. It has burned for a month today and is about 45% contained. It will probably not grow in size as fast, now that ... more is contained, but possibly [will] burn for more than a month more. 'Contained' doesn't mean 'out.'"

The next day Sharon Miller of Westminster, Colorado, reported: "So far the High Park Fire has burned 55,050 acres and they have confirmed 181 homes have been destroyed by the fire, one human death. ... They are saying now that it could be months before it's completely out ..." Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who oversees the Forest Service, told fire managers in the state that "fighting this fire is going to require us to be aggressive, persistent and also patient. We're going to continue to work to make our forests more resilient, ... to ensure that adequate resources are provided for fighting fires and ... to ... encourage appropriate stewardship of our forests."    

While wildfires scorched America, half a world away on June 18 a Canadian who was camping on a remote Norwegian island broke his foot. After waiting to be rescued for three days, he decided to try sending out smoke signals, which had the unintended consequence of setting his tent on fire. The tourist did get the attention he needed, but at the cost of sparking a raging wildfire that engulfed a large part of the island in flames. It eventually took 20 firefighters and two army helicopters to put out the blaze.
                                                       
For more on these stories:     

Winds Set to Fan Destructive Colorado Fire, The Wall Street Journal
Lost Camper's Smoke Signals Accidentally Start Massive Island Fire, Yahoo News
                                 
Questions
1. What does John the Baptist mean that Jesus was coming to baptize with the Holy Spirit and fire (Luke 3:16)? What did Jesus mean when he said that he came to bring fire to the earth (Luke 12:49)?

2. In the Bible fire is used as a metaphor for strong emotions such as wrath, anger, jealousy, lust (Proverbs 6:23-29) and passion. It is also associated with burnt offerings commanded by God, with the Word of God (Jeremiah 23:29) and with the Holy Spirit (Luke 3:16; Acts 2:3). How can this be applied to Christian life today?

3. God "is a consuming fire" (Hebrews 12:29) who "[comes] in fire" to rebuke and execute judgment (Isaiah 66:15-16), devour (Joel 1:19-20; Psalm 50:3; Jeremiah 21:14), test and refine (1 Corinthians 3:10-15; Zechariah 13:9; 1 Peter 4:12). Where do you see this happening in the world today?

Some Bible Verses


Psalm 104:4

"You make the winds your messengers, fire and flame your ministers."

Psalm 148:7-8

"Praise the LORD from the earth, you sea monsters and all deeps, fire and hail, snow and frost, stormy wind fulfilling his command!"
Questions: What message might God be sending through wind, and how might fire and flame serve God's purposes and fulfill his command? Are there times when the elements seem to be rebelling against God?

James 3:5-8

"So also the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great exploits. How great a forest is set ablaze by a small fire! And the tongue is a fire. ... and is itself set on fire by hell. ... no one can tame the tongue -- a restless evil, full of deadly poison." (For context, read James 3:2-12.)
Questions: The Canadian tourist who started a forest fire with one small spark learned what firefighters in the American Southwest know already: that fire is unpredictable and difficult to control. Why is it so important to develop the fruit of the Spirit known as self-control in the way we communicate? What can happen when we neglect this spiritual discipline?
1 Peter 1:6-7
"In this you rejoice, even if now for a little while you have had to suffer various trials, so that the genuineness of your faith -- being more precious than gold that, though perishable, is tested by fire -- may be found to result in praise and glory and honor when Jesus Christ is revealed." (For context, read 1:3-9.)
Questions: Recall a time when God tested you by fire. Were you prepared to deal with it?  How did that experience refine you and draw you closer to God? What might a spiritual disaster preparedness plan look like, and how could you implement it in your own life? What could help you extinguish "the flaming arrows of the evil one" (Ephesians 6:16) in the future? How could fiery trials produce praise and glory and honor?  

Isaiah 43:2

"When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; and through the rivers, they shall not overwhelm you; when you walk through fire you shall not be burned, and the flame shall not consume you."
Question: After a wildfire has been contained, the danger is not over, since floods and mudslides often follow. Knowing that you may face spiritual floods as well as fires that test your faith, what is the significance of Isaiah 43:2?
 
Closing Prayer


O God, help us to step out in faith, and to take risks for you and your kingdom. In the face of fiery trials, may we trust in your protection and peace. In Jesus' name. Amen. 

 
Copyright 2012 Communication Resources

Friday, June 8, 2012

Snake-Handling Pastor Dies of Rattler's Bite


Snake-Handling Pastor Dies of Rattler's Bite
The Wired Word for June 10, 2012

In the News


During a Sunday service two weeks ago, Pastor Mark Wolford, 44, was fatally bitten by a rattlesnake during a snake-handling ritual considered a sign of faith and of God's power. Wolford had seen his father die from a snake bite during a similar church ritual almost 20 years earlier.

The service was an outdoor event held at the Panther Wildlife Management Area in West Virginia. Wolford was part of a Pentecostal sect that takes Mark 16:17-18 as authorization for dangerous tests of faith. In the King James Version, those verses read: "And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover."

Based on these verses, some who handle snakes as a religious practice also have rituals during which they drink strychnine and play with fire as a testimony of faith. Wolford previously said he had swallowed strychnine on several occasions. He said the poison made his muscles stiffen and lungs seize up, but didn't leave him with any long-term effects.

Partway through the service two weeks ago, Wolford passed around a timber rattlesnake. He then laid it on the ground and sat down beside it. The snake suddenly bit him on thigh.

Wolford was then driven to a family member's home about 80 miles away to recover. But he became much sicker and was eventually taken to a hospital, where he died.

Officials at the wildlife area say they didn't know the event was happening and would not have given permission for it if they had, as West Virginia state park rules prohibit bringing animals other than dogs and cats onto the grounds. Snake-handling per se is not illegal in West Virginia, though other Appalachian states, including Kentucky and Tennessee, have banned it in public spaces.

Snake-handling as an act of faith began in 1909 in an east Tennessee church, and once had several thousand practitioners. There are far fewer people today publicly involved with it, though there may be some who practice snake-handling in home settings. Mainstream Pentecostal denominations condemn the practice in any setting.

Snake-handling practitioners believe that when a person is bitten during one of the rituals, the person may become sick, but that if the person is not a "backslider," God will eventually intervene and restore the person to health. No anti-venom drugs are used. Wolford himself had previously survived bites from copperheads.

Those who do die from snake bites are not assumed to lack faith; rather it is believed that it was simply that person's time to die. It's estimated that 80 to 100 people have died from snake-handling rituals since the practice began.

In a Washington Post report last year about snake-handling as an act of faith, a reporter spoke to a practitioner who identified himself only as Clifton. He explained, "I'm a serpent hound, a sign-believing preacher." He maintains that people must handle snakes, drink poison, practice healing and speak in tongues to be saved. He is aware that the number of people like him is diminishing but that may be a good thing, he said. "Scripture says unless there's a great falling away, the end won't come."

More on this story can be found at these links:

"Serpent-Handling" West Virginia Pastor Dies From Snake Bite. ABCNews
In West Virginia, Snake Handling Is Still Considered a Sign of Faith. Washington Post

The Big Questions
1. Most Christians reject such practices as snake-handling, poison-drinking and fire-playing as means of testing faith. But is it important to test our faith in some way? Why or why not? What does it mean to "test" one's faith? What is the difference between "testing" one's faith, "stepping out in faith" and "putting God to the test"?

2. Is every verse in the Bible meant to be read literally? Give some examples to support your answer. Is every verse meant to be taken as applying to oneself? Again, support your answer with some examples. What is the difference between taking a passage "literally" and taking it "literalistically"? How can one tell when one or the other is appropriate?

3. Is there anything actually sinful about deliberately participating in a dangerous act for the purpose of showing God's power? If not, why not? If so, what might such a sin be called?

4. If not by dramatic and dangerous tests of faith, how does God want us to relate to him?

5. It's easy to ridicule faith practices that seem to us to be misguided, but what genuine religious impulse is at their root? What things doto you do to respond to that impulse?

Confronting the News With Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

James 1:2-4

"My brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of any kind, consider it nothing but joy, because you know that the testing of your faith produces endurance; and let endurance have its full effect, so that you may be mature and complete, lacking in nothing." (For context, read 1:2-8.)

Here James talks about the testing of faith, but he's not referring to some dangerous practice that one does deliberately. Rather he's talking about life's troubles, difficulties or "trials" (to use James' term) that come to us unbidden. His point is that while these trials make life hard, risky and painful, sometimes they benefit us as well, because they can teach us things, help us to mature and may even deepen our faith.

Still, it's not easy to immediately affirm James' viewpoint here. When you face troubles, you should consider it "nothing but joy"? Really?

James lived in an age when every Christian faced the possibility of hostility from outside. So when he spoke of "trials," he may have been thinking specifically of persecution. We've not had much experience with that, but we know what it's like to have so many troubles that we feel like someone has it in for us. We've had experience with nuisances, wretched luck, bad timing, misfortune, failure, pain and disappointment. And we know what temptation feels like, too.

James is telling us that tough times are potentially occasions for blessing because if we weather them while holding onto our faith, we will emerge stronger and more mature spiritually. We will have faith that has been tested, not deliberately, but by the pain of being human.

At root, James is talking about who or what defines reality for us. If we look at troubles and temptations as having the final word in our lives, then reality for us is that life is trouble and there isn't much we can do about it. But James is saying that God defines reality, and if, when we have troubles and temptations, we have confidence that God has the final word, then it is possible to see trials and troubles as temporary conditions. It is a different way of looking at the world, and with that perspective, joy may be a more natural response than despair.
Questions: When have you experienced troubles as a testing of faith? What happened to your faith while you were in the midst of the difficulty or pain? How does your faith today compare with your faith when you were a beginner in Christianity?

Mark 16:17-18

"And these signs will accompany those who believe: by using my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes in their hands, and if they drink any deadly thing, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover." (For context, read 16:14-18.)

At The Wired Word, we take the Scriptures very seriously, but for these verses, which snake-handlers use to explain their practices, we must state a qualification. The fact is, in the oldest manuscripts of the New Testament (and presumably, therefore, the most accurate), the gospel of Mark ends at 16:8. (If you'd like to see this for yourself, take a look at the Codex Sinaiticus online (http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/), the oldest complete copy of the New Testament. It's in Greek, but if you click on the "See the Manuscript" tab and then use the search feature to look up Mark 16, you'll get an English translation.

That means Mark 16:9-20 was added much later, by someone other than the original author. Every modern version of the Bible acknowledges this in some way. For example:
  • the New International Version (NIV), while including Mark 16:9-20, adds this statement between Mark 16:8 and 16:9: "The earliest manuscripts and some other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20."
  • the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) also includes 16:9-20, but explains in a footnote: "Some of the most ancient authorities bring the book to a close at the end of verse 8."
  • the New American Standard Bible (NASB) includes the suspect text, but has this footnote: "Some of the oldest [manuscripts] do not contain vv. 9-20."
  • The Message includes 9-20 but encloses the passage in square brackets and says in a footnote: "Mark 16:9-20 [the portion in brackets] is contained only in later manuscripts."
  • and the newest version, the Common English Bible (CEB), has this heading above 16:9-20: "Endings Added Later," as well as an explanatory footnote.

Thus, when considering what weight to give this business about snake-handling and poison-drinking, it's important to recognize that the Gospel of Mark in its original form did not include such comments. This may not be convincing to the snake-handling groups, however, because most use only the King James Version of the Bible (published in 1611), based upon Erasmus' Greek Bible, often called the Textus Receptus ("received text"), which is not as old as the Codex Sinaiticus. Neither the KJV nor the Textus Receptus indicate that those last 12 verses of Mark are a later addition.

It's not difficult to understand why someone felt compelled to add to Mark's gospel, however. Mark 16:8 reads, "So they went out and fled from the tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid." Fear seems like an odd note on which to end a gospel. What kind of closure is that? Mark 16:1-8 does tell of the Resurrection, but to stop at verse 8 seems like one is leaving out the rest of the story.

Did Mark intend that his book end with verse 8 or did he write some more that somehow got separated from his original manuscript, so that the earliest copyists did not have it to copy? Nobody knows the answer for sure, although many Bible scholars today conclude that verse 8 was the original ending. But we can understand why a later editor might have wanted to add a more upbeat conclusion.
Questions: Read Mark 16:9-20. How much of what's there is supported by the other three gospels? What's there that is not supported by the other three?

Luke 10:19, which is not a contested part of Scripture, says, "See, I have given you authority to tread on snakes and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy; and nothing will hurt you." At first glance, this would also seem to support snake-handling as a faith ritual. But read it in context (10:1-20). In what ways does the context make this a special case? What especially does verse 20 add to your understanding of verse 19?

Luke 4:12

"It is said, 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'" (For context, read 4:1-13.)

This is Jesus' response to the devil when the latter tempted Jesus to throw himself down from the pinnacle of the temple, performing a dramatic and mind-blowing stunt sure to gain him an immediate following. The devil reminded Jesus that because of his unique identity as the Son of God, angels were on hand to ensure that no harm would come to him if he made this jump. But Jesus responded with the words above, quoting Deuteronomy 6:16. In effect, Jesus is saying that the divine protection hadn't been given for him to demonstrate how well it worked or to make stunts possible. To rely on divine intervention while taking showy risks presumes on God's graciousness. (Thus, the answer to the last part of Big Question 3 might be "presumption.")

There is a difference in kind between trusting God in a given situation, praying for (and, perhaps, even trusting in) divine intervention, and seeking out situations wherein one is basically deciding that God needs to perform a miracle on demand.
Questions: No doubt, most practitioners of snake-handling as a faith ritual are sincere in their belief that the practice is appropriate and God-pleasing. What might you say to such a person from your understanding of the Christian faith to explain why the practice might not please God? How do you decide which of your own actions are God-pleasing?

Acts 28:3, 5

"Paul had gathered a bundle of brushwood and was putting it on the fire, when a viper, driven out by the heat, fastened itself on his hand. ... He, however, shook off the creature into the fire and suffered no harm." (For context, read 28:1-10.)

This incident from Paul's life is a good example of the difference between trusting God for help and "testing" God. Paul was putting wood on a fire "when a viper, driven out by the heat, fastened itself on his hand." Those who witnessed this immediately concluded that Paul must be a murderer who was receiving a kind of rough justice. They expected him to "swell up or drop dead" (v. 6), but Paul merely shook the poisonous snake off and suffered no ill effects. (The witnesses then concluded that Paul must be a god!)

This was almost certainly a case where God protected Paul, but Paul didn't deliberately go looking for a snake so he could prove his faith to his audience or demonstrate the extent to which God would protect him from harm.
Questions: When have you been aware that God saved you from harm? Why does God not always save the faithful from harm?

Proverbs 27:1

"Do not boast about tomorrow, for you do not know what a day may bring." (This is a stand-alone proverb; no additional context needed.)

"Boasting about tomorrow" probably means making plans without allowing for the action of God. The Message words this proverb as "Don't brashly announce what you're going to do tomorrow; you don't know the first thing about tomorrow."
Question: How might "boasting" about tomorrow be a form of the sin of presumption? (Read James 4:13-17, to see his answer to this question.)

For Further Discussion
1. How might the following verse apply to today's lesson? "All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:16-17).  

2. How might the following verses apply to today's lesson? "Is there anyone among you who, if your child asks for a fish, will give a snake instead of a fish? Or if the child asks for an egg, will give a scorpion? If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!" (Luke 11:11-13).

Responding to the News


It's worth considering in what ways we should be displaying our faith.

Other News This Week
Iconic Vietnam Photo Is 40 Years Old

Most of those who lived through the Vietnam era will recall Nick Ut's photo of a little girl running naked down the street in agony after her village was struck by napalm June 8, 1972. That searing photo was shot 40 years ago this week.

Two of the girl's cousins died in the attack. She was put in the morgue because her burns were so extensive and severe that she wasn't expected to survive. The subject of the photo, Kim Phuc (pronounced "fook"), was forever changed by the event and all that followed: a 14-month hospitalization; countless operations; attempts of governments, private individuals and agencies to politicize her suffering and to capitalize on her unwanted celebrity.

"People tell me, 'You are living history' because my picture is in the history books," Ms. Phuc said from her home near Toronto. "But I say ... I am not only living history, but I am a living miracle."

"I hated my life. I hated everyone who was normal because I was not normal. And living with that is really like hell in this life. I have no hope. No dream. No nothing. And how come? Deep down in my heart, I am seeking the truth. I am seeking the answer all the time: 'Why me?' My life became a bird in a cage. I felt so bitter and angry. I cursed those who had hurt me. I had to change my heart or die from hatred."  

She turned to her family's Buddhism and other religions in her search for peace and understanding. "I pray to too many gods -- to Buddha, to Hindu, to the river, the ocean, the mountain, ancestors who are dead in the family. But no answer. I still suffering. I wanted to die."

Things started to change when she picked up a copy of the New Testament at the library. "When I got to John 14:6, and I read that Jesus say, 'I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man can come to heaven but by me,' then I was really confused ... because my religion combine everything! ... What was true, my religion or Jesus?"

She said she became a Christian on Christmas Day 1982, when she was 19. Phuc cited the words of Luke from the New Testament: "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you."

Phuc admits that forgiving the people who hurt her was a long and challenging road. "I had to pray ... a lot," she said. "I started to put all the names of the people who caused my suffering on my prayer list ... my heart became softer. ... The power of love and forgiveness is more powerful than any weapon of war."

"The picture was one of the first things my father showed me when I returned from hospital 14 months after it was taken, and I hated it then," Phuc said. "But now I consider it as a gift from God, as part of God's plan for my life, and it has helped open so many doors to bring a message of forgiveness and hope to so many people around the world. ... Over the years, I have learned to take control of the picture and not let the photograph control me. I cannot change the history of what happened to me," she said. "But I can change the meaning of it."

More on this story can be found at these links:

The Long Road to Forgiveness. NPR
(audio story)
AP "Napalm Girl" Photo from Vietnam War Turns 40. Salon
"Girl in the Picture" Headlines Faith Week. The Cannon
Girl in Famous Photograph Turns Tragedy Into Blessing. Toledo Blade
The Kim Foundation International

Questions to Consider
1. What can Phuc's experience teach us about God's ability to redeem suffering, transform us and give purpose and direction to our lives through adversity?

2. Is there someone in your life you need to forgive? What can you take from Phuc's life experience that can help you forgive others?

3. What do you think Phuc found in the person of Christ that was so compelling and that brought her release from her anger, bitterness and despair?   

4. Are there things in your life you cannot change but wish you could? How can you change the meaning of those things?

5. What good can God bring out of horrific experiences such as the anguish Phuc went through?  

Scripture to Guide Your Discussion


2 Corinthians 3:18

"And all of us, with unveiled faces, seeing the glory of the Lord as though reflected in a mirror, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another; for this comes from the Lord, the Spirit."
Question: How has God transformed affliction into glory in your life?

2 Corinthians 4:6-11, 15-18

"For it is the God who said, 'Let light shine out of darkness,' who has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. But we have this treasure in clay jars, so that it may be made clear that this extraordinary power belongs to God and does not come from us. We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed; always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be made visible in our bodies. For while we live, we are always being given up to death for Jesus' sake, so that the life of Jesus may be made visible in our mortal flesh. ... Yes, everything is for your sake, so that grace, as it extends to more and more people, may increase thanksgiving, to the glory of God. So we do not lose heart. Even though our outer nature is wasting away, our inner nature is being renewed day by day. For this slight momentary affliction is preparing us for an eternal weight of glory beyond all measure, because we look not at what can be seen but at what cannot be seen; for what can be seen is temporary, but what cannot be seen is eternal."
Question: How does physical and emotional trauma compel us to search beyond what is temporary and material for what is eternal and inner?

2 Corinthians 5:17-20

"So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation: everything old has passed away; see, everything has become new! All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting the message of reconciliation to us. So we are ambassadors for Christ, since God is making his appeal through us; we entreat you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God."
Question: How can you become an agent of change and a minister of reconciliation in your own situation?

Philippians 3:20-21

"... the Lord Jesus Christ ... will transform the body of our humiliation that it may be conformed to the body of his glory, by the power that also enables him to make all things subject to himself."

Romans 12:1-2

"I appeal to you therefore, brothers and sisters, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God -- what is good and acceptable and perfect."

See also Genesis 45:4-9 and 50:15-21.

Closing Prayer


O God, thank you for the reality of faith and for the wisdom it teaches us, even through our troubles. In Jesus' name. Amen. 
 
Copyright 2012 Communication Resources