Thursday, October 25, 2012

After Cremation, Six Ounces of Metal Found in WWII Vet's Leg


British soldier Ronald Brown came out of World War II with shrapnel embedded in his left leg, the result of stepping on a land mine while serving in France in 1944. He was far from medical aid when the blast happened and had to crawl two miles to receive help.

When he finally was treated, medical personnel decided it was safer to leave the shrapnel in Brown's body than to dig it out.

Brown survived the war, and his family knew that the incident had left him with "a bad knee." His daughter said he told the family he had "a bullet" there, but he never mentioned the fragments. He did ask his grandchildren not to sit on his knee because of the discomfort it caused, but he didn't complain of pain otherwise, and he seldom spoke about the war.

After the war, Brown went on to work as a tax inspector and lived a full life, but when traveling and passing through airports, he always set off scanners at the security checkpoints.

Following his death, when Brown's family gathered to scatter his ashes, they asked the funeral director if the bullet had been found. What they were given, however, was a bag containing a stunning six ounces of metal fragments, including shards, wire, screws and other pieces (see a photo here).

One of Brown's five grandchildren, Holly, 22, said, "We are all very proud of him and what he did for all of us. The bits of metal in him just show how horrible the war was."

She said Brown kept a journal of his wartime experiences, in which he says he introduced the British delicacy of egg and chips to people in France. But he also wrote that of the original 900 members of his regiment, only 29 lived to come home.

TWW team member Charles Alkula, who is the chaplain resident at the Audie Murphy VA Hospital in San Antonio, comments that in his work, he hears "a lot about suffering in its many forms. This story about the shrapnel is replayed many times each day, and the shrapnel doesn't always present in the form of shards of metal."

More on this story can be found at this link:

Weighty Memento: War Veteran's Secret Revealed After His Death. The Telegraph

NOTE: As we go to press, new reports indicate that the origin of the metal in Ronald Brown's body is not as certain as originally thought (see update here). However, for the purposes of this lesson, we will base our reflections on the initial reports. Either way, Mr. Brown carried in his body lingering discomfort resulting from his service in the war.

The Big Questions
1. What sorts of emotional, spiritual or psychological baggage do people tend to carry? Name as many types as you can.

2. What is implied by referring to these matters as "baggage"? Is "baggage" something different from "sin"? Explain your answer.

3. What sorts of emotional or spiritual wounds can people have but not be aware of as injuries? What kinds of problem-causing behavior can arise from such unrecognized injuries? How does such lack of awareness occur?

4. What is the meaning of bearing one's cross? When have you been conscious of carrying a cross?

5. Insofar as you are comfortable sharing with your group: What emotional, psychological or spiritual "shrapnel" are you aware of carrying around with you? In what ways does your faith in Christ help you deal with it? Are there any wounds that you have hesitated to expose to your faith?

Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Genesis 50:20
"Even though you intended to do harm to me, God intended it for good, in order to preserve a numerous people, as he is doing today." (For context, read 50:15-21.)

This is Joseph's statement to his brothers, who had years earlier sold him into slavery. That was, of course, a bad thing. But Joseph is here saying that God took a bad thing and brought some good out of it: The sale into slavery brought Joseph to Egypt, where he was in a position to respond when Pharaoh needed a dream interpreted, and then to assist with managing food during a time of famine.
Question: When has something that wounded you and left you with some kind of ongoing pain become an avenue for something good? Sometimes non-Christians misunderstand it when Christians refer to some tragedy as being part of "God's will," as if God desires to harm people. How can you explain to them what is meant?

Matthew 8:16-17
"That evening they brought to [Jesus] many who were possessed with demons; and he cast out the spirits with a word, and cured all who were sick. This was to fulfill what had been spoken through the prophet Isaiah, 'He took our infirmities and bore our diseases.'" (For context, read 8:14-17.)
Romans 8:26
"Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but that very Spirit intercedes with sighs too deep for words." (For context, read 8:18-27.)

Note how Matthew, the gospel writer, describes Jesus' activities: "... he cast out the spirits with a word, and cured all who were sick." Then Matthew adds that Jesus' work that day fulfilled a prophecy from Isaiah (53:4), which Matthew quotes: "He took our infirmities and bore our diseases."
              
Notice that in both cases, there are two activities named: healing (or bearing our diseases) and casting out spirits (taking our infirmities). The same Greek word translated as "infirmities" here is also used in Romans 8:26. In the King James Version it's still "infirmities." Several newer translations, seeking a more modern equivalent, substitute not "illnesses," but "weaknesses." The Hebrew word in Isaiah is even more poignant, with shades of grief, pain and sorrow.

In the Bible, the word "infirmity" or "weakness" seems to mean something between our sins on the one hand and our illnesses on the other. The Matthew reading above equates this with being possessed by spirits, but the context leads us to believe it may be some kind of emotional baggage being referred to, a part of our psyches that has been wounded or scarred by life. Such wounds tend to trigger responses at inappropriate moments, and often interfere with our relationships. For baggage, this passage of Scripture suggests that what is needed is neither forgiveness nor medicine, but divine healing.

We Christians, who know the vocabulary of righteousness, may be tempted to label some of these hang-ups as sins, and that can be confusing. The person who has too high an opinion of herself may be guilty of the sin of pride, but the one who flaunts his abilities may not be proud at all. He may have such low self-esteem that his apparent pride is actually an attempt to hide how worthless he feels. What he suffers from is not sin, but baggage. And what he needs is not forgiveness, but healing. With our finite knowledge, we often cannot be sure.
Question: In what ways can God heal our weaknesses?

2 Corinthians 12:7-9
"Therefore, to keep me from being too elated, a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to torment me, to keep me from being too elated. Three times I appealed to the Lord about this, that it would leave me, but he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness." (For context, read 12:1-10.)

We don't know what the "thorn" in Paul's flesh was. It may have been a physical problem. Commentators over the centuries have suggested that it might have been epilepsy, severe headaches, malaria or eyesight problems (perhaps the side effect of his blinding-light conversion experience; see Acts 9). Others have speculated that he was referring to spiritual temptation (such as to shirk the duties of the apostolic life), the persecutions he encountered or even carnal temptations. But it could just as easily have been an emotional problem, a phobia or a psychological hang-up.

Interestingly, the Greek word often translated "thorn" can also mean "stake," and in Paul's day, criminals were sometimes impaled on a sharp stake. Whatever was troubling Paul, he perhaps felt that it was impaling him. Three times Paul prayed that the thorn/stake might be removed, but he discovered that God was not going to remove it (recall that the doctors decided not to remove Brown's shrapnel). Instead, God helped Paul find strength to live with it. In fact, Paul said, "Therefore I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities for the sake of Christ; for whenever I am weak, then I am strong" (v.10).
Question: When has a personal issue that cannot be removed led you to find greater strength from Christ?

Mark 8:34
"If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me." (For context, read 8:31-38.)

Not every burden we carry has been inflicted on us; some we choose to carry, and for Christians, the cross of Christ represents such a choice. Note, however, that cross-carrying refers to Jesus' cross and not our own. Sometimes we refer to some annoyance or problem in our lives as "our cross to bear," but when we apply that expression to difficulties of the sort that come to most of us whether we are Christians or not, we are missing the point. Jesus was speaking of something far more significant, and it had nothing to do with problems that would have beset us whether we were following him or not.

This passage of Scripture comes at the midpoint of Mark's account of Jesus' life. More importantly, it comes at a crossroad in the 12 disciples' journey with Jesus. Until that point, following him had been a fairly upbeat affair: The sick had been healed, the hungry fed, storms had been stilled, the possessed had been freed of their demons, and other miracles had taken place. No problem seemed too big to surmount. The Twelve had traveled with Jesus throughout all this, and it had been exciting.

But in this passage, Jesus changed the tone of things abruptly when he announced that he was soon to suffer, be rejected, be killed and then rise again. He added that continuing to follow him would require the disciples to deny themselves and carry a cross. In effect, Jesus was saying, "From here on, the road gets much harder. You need to decide if you're going to continue with me. If you decide to stay with me, be prepared to be rejected by many and even to give your life."

Cross carrying then, does not mean putting up with some problem or irritation. It means denying ourselves and putting Christ's claim on us first. Certainly not every cross means doing something we find distasteful, but it does mean that walking with Jesus has a higher priority than pursuing things that interfere with his will for us.
Question: In what circumstances are you aware of the weight of Christ's cross that you have chosen to carry?           

For Further Discussion
1. Suppose everything that bothers you -- every trouble, worry, guilt, problem, pain, regret, grief -- were somehow given tangible form and piled up on your shoulders. How heavy would that load be? How do you manage to carry it? How can you unload some of it?

2. Comment on this, heard in a sermon: "The fact is, very few of us reach adulthood without baggage of some kind. We may suffer from exaggerated guilt, wounded self-esteem, the inability to accept responsibility for our mistakes, extreme defensiveness, overwhelming anxiety, undue depression, too much anger or the inability to express anger, feelings of inferiority, excessive shyness and so forth. Some of this baggage may simply be annoying, but some is downright painful and crippling, especially in relationships."

3. Respond to this: In Galatians 6:2, Paul says, "Bear one another's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ." But just three verses later, he says, "For all must carry their own loads." The advice that Christians ought to bear one another's burdens is an excellent statement of what ought to happen in churches, among friends and in families. But "everyone must carry his own load" is a reminder not to place unrealistic expectations on that advice. Don't think for one minute that a burden shared is a burden gone. Others can lighten our load, but never can they fully remove it. In the final analysis, we continue to carry it ourselves.

4. Comment on this: There is a story about a missionary who was teaching in a culture where it was the custom to sit on the floor. She found it physically uncomfortable to sit this way for extended periods, but did it anyway. One day, one of her pupils noticed the teacher's discomfort, so she moved over and sat down behind the teacher, back to back, so that her back supported the teacher's back. The teacher was grateful, but soon the pupil realized that the teacher was trying not to put too much weight on her. So the girl whispered to the teacher, "If you love me, lean hard."

Responding to the News

Here are four things people have found helpful in dealing with their infirmities/weaknesses:

1. Ask God to help us face our problems squarely and without rationalization. Admit to him the specific reaction that interferes with our relationships and keeps us from being whole.

2. Empty the poison bottle. In other words, take a look at those whom we blame for certain hang-ups and decide what we need to do to keep those memories from poisoning us today. In some cases, that may mean forgiving someone. In others, it may mean holding someone accountable.

3. Accept the responsibility for who we are today. In terms of understanding where our various complexes originate, it may be helpful, briefly, to look at what circumstances in our past have contributed to the shaping of our present personalities, but it's far more important to say, "Regardless of how I got where I am, I am responsible for dealing with it now and for working to become the whole person God intended me to be." That may even mean ignoring certain gut reactions and behaving in more adult ways instead.

4. Lay the problem before God. This suggests that while emotional baggage is not a failure of spiritual commitment, we are nonetheless right in bringing it to God for healing and help. These areas of our lives are not subject to ordinary prayer, discipline or willpower, but they can be changed by the special healing attention of God.


Friday, October 19, 2012

Baumgartner Sky Dives From 24 Miles High, Sets Record, Breaks Sound Barrier


Last Sunday, Austrian daredevil Felix Baumgartner, 43, set the record for the highest ever sky dive, jumping from a balloon capsule approximately 24 miles above Earth and breaking the sound barrier on the way down. He reached a maximum speed of 833.9 mph -- Mach 1.24 -- and became the first person to do so wearing only a high-tech pressure suit.

The descent, from a height about three times the average cruising altitude for jetliners, took about nine minutes, with Baumgartner free-falling for about half of that time. He then deployed a parachute and landed safely in eastern New Mexico.

The event, which was livestreamed to the Internet, was watched in real time by some 8 million viewers around the world. While some declared the jump from the stratosphere little more than a stunt and others complained because Baumgartner wasn't doing it to raise funds for some charity, many more loved it for its sheer audacity. There also were some scientific learnings from the endeavor, and the data collected should lead to improved technologies for high-altitude bailouts for pilots and for astronauts' space suits.

Joe Kittinger, 84, the holder of the former high-dive record, was a key participant on the team supporting Baumgartner, and it was his voice on the radio to Baumgartner during the ascent giving  both encouragement and instructions. Kittinger set his record in 1960, while, as a U.S. Air Force captain, he jumped from more than 19 miles up to test a high-altitude parachute system for the military.

"I had a guardian angel look after me and the same guardian angel looked after Felix," Kittinger said. "I think God has a special guardian angel that's space-qualified that he sends to take care of people like Felix and I."

Baumgartner's jump was not without a couple of hitches. At one point while still in the capsule, he reported a problem with the heater in his helmet's faceplate, a difficulty so serious that if not resolved, could have forced the team to abort the mission. Once he jumped, he needed to be able to see the horizon in order to maneuver into a stable position. He and his team did resolve that problem, however. And after Baumgartner jumped, he initially went into an uncontrolled spin, which, if left unchecked, would have been life-threatening. He could have deployed a stabilization chute to stop the spin, but that would also mean that he wouldn't go supersonic. Fortunately, he was able to pull out of the spin without using the chute.

The dive was sponsored by Red Bull, an "energy" drink that's mostly sugary water. Its advertising says it will "give you wings," though multiple studies have debunked the so-called sugar high. Still, its ads made it a logical sponsor for a high-flying event.

After the jump, Baumgartner said, "When I was standing there on top of the world, you become so humble, you do not think about breaking records anymore, you do not think about gaining scientific data. The only thing you want is to come back alive."

And he added, "Sometimes we have to get really high to see how small we are."

More on this story can be found at these links:

Skydiver Survives 24-Mile High Jump, Breaks Sound Barrier. Fox News
Felix Baumgartner: Joe Kittinger Says "It Was Like Déjà Vu." The Telegraph
Why Does the World Need People Like Felix Baumgartner? Aljazeera
Why Felix Baumgartner's Mission Was Nearly Aborted at the Last Minute. PopSci
Felix Baumgartner Suit Camera Captures Dizzying Uncontrolled Spin. Huffington Post
 
The Big Questions
1. Baumgartner's jump likely happened as it did at least in part because of what was learned 52 years ago when Kittinger made his jump. In what ways is your faith today built on what generations of Christians before you learned about following Jesus? Who, specifically, are your spiritual "ancestors"?

2. What specific things do you know about the practice of faith because of what spiritual ancestors discovered?

3. Had Baumgartner's faceplate problem not been solved, he would not have been able to see the horizon and maneuver into a stable position after jumping. In what sense is faith a way of seeing that helps you find stability in life?

4. What sorts of spiritual preparation do you undertake in the course of an average week? What difference does that make?
5. After all the hoopla and preparation, and after the long climb to altitude, Baumgartner had to actually step outside the capsule, and after a pause, he had to actually let go. What for you has corresponded to this moment? When have you had to let go? Was it a matter of "letting go and letting God"? What was the result? Who was part of your support crew? Did you feel the presence and/or guidance of God?

Confronting the News with Scripture and Hope

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

2 Kings 2:13

"[Elisha] picked up the mantle of Elijah that had fallen from him, and went back and stood on the bank of the Jordan." (For context, read 2:1-14.)

This verse is from the account of the great prophet Elijah ascending to heaven. As he did, his mantle (cloak) fell from his shoulders. Elisha, Elijah's apprentice, then picked up the mantle, which was a symbolic way of showing that he was now stepping into the prophetic role that Elijah had filled.

There is a sense in which Baumgartner was picking up Kittinger's "mantle" when he made his jump. The fact that he asked Kittinger to be on his team showed that he was conscious that he was indebted to and building on what had been learned from Kittinger's work.
Questions: In what ways did your spiritual ancestors communicate their faith discoveries to you? How are you passing on your faith discoveries to generations coming after you? Elisha was told he needed to walk with Elijah if he was to receive the mantle of prophecy himself. How willing are you to "walk" spiritually with another, whether a contemporary or perhaps one of the historic mystics or spiritual leaders of the church (walking with them by studying their writings), in order to absorb more fully their ministry and to inherit a measure of their insight or passion? Do you think as a culture we have the patience to "walk" for a distance?

Mark 1:9, 12-13

"In those days Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. ... And the Spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness. He was in the wilderness forty days, tempted by Satan; and he was with the wild beasts; and the angels waited on him." (For context, read Mark 1:9-13).

Mark 1:9-13 tells, in summary fashion, of the way Jesus was prepared for his ministry, first through baptism, and then through a formative time in the wilderness in which he fasted and faced temptations.

Elsewhere, the gospels tell that Jesus took time for daily spiritual preparations as well, seeking time to be alone and pray (see, for example, Mark 1:35.)
Questions: This links to our news story in that the sky dive required significant and careful preparations. In fact, without those preparations, the unexpected problem with the helmet faceplate could not have been fixed. What problems of life have you found yourself spiritually prepared to address and resolve? Are you disciplined in your spiritual preparations? Have you ever been surprised by difficulties along your spiritual journey that might have been anticipated if you had been more intentional in preparation?

Acts 9:18

"And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and his sight was restored. Then he got up and was baptized ..." (For context, read 9:1-19.)

After Paul had his blinding-light encounter with Christ on the road to Damascus, he was initially unable to see. Eventually, through the ministry of the prophet Ananias, Paul's sight was, in the words of the text, "restored." His spiritual sight, however, wasn't simply restored; it was reoriented so that he now saw things differently. We might even say that the horizon he was heading for was changed.  
Questions: It was important for Baumgartner to be able to see the horizon to stabilize himself after jumping. What helps you keep your eyes on the horizon that orients your faith and life? When have you had a blinding-light moment that knocked you off your perch and changed your horizons, your perception of the universe? Did you require some measure of disorientation before you could see the world in the light of Christ?

Psalm 8:3-4

"When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars that you have established; what are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals that you care for them?" (For context, read 8:1-9.)

After his jump, Baumgartner said, "Sometimes we have to get really high to see how small we are," which sounds similar to the comment of the psalmist above.
Questions: What role do such things as wonder, awe, a sense of insignificance have on your sense of where you fit into the world God has made? The song "America the Beautiful" was originally named "Pike's Peak," and was the direct result of the wonder the author felt when she looked out from that peak onto the plains of Kansas in one direction and the mountains of Colorado in another. What event or sight has given you the perspective of the psalmist, a sense of wonder and awe at God's creation?  

For Further Discussion
1. What is your view of daredevil events -- of taking extreme risks? Should Christians engage in such things? Why or why not? Should participation in such actions be banned by the government? Why or why not?

2. Thanks to Baumgartner, we now know that given the right equipment and training, a person can survive a jump from great height. Does the usefulness of this knowledge make the risks worthwhile? If there were no useful outcome, would that change your feeling about whether it is right to undertake these risks?

3. Although some promos ahead of this event described it as a "mission to the edge of space" or a "space jump," that's not technically true. The internationally recognized boundary where the atmosphere "ends" and space "begins" is at 62 miles above sea level, a boundary known as the Kármán line, and Baumgartner didn't go nearly that high. Does the hype diminish the accomplishment? Explain your answer.

4. Events like this sky-dive push the boundaries of human accomplishment. Should that in any way change what we think we need from our Creator? Explain your answer.

5. Comment on this newspaper comic strip, Arlo and Janis. In one particular strip, Arlo, the father, has just confronted his young son, Gene, about some infraction or other. Gene protests, "But, Dad! I'm only human!" Arlo responds, "That's no excuse, son!" Gene says, "It isn't? I thought I'd found a loophole."

6. Did you watch the actual event live or through a recording? Did you watch at all? If live, how involved were you emotionally during the event? Do you feel the same level of involvement/empathy toward someone making a spiritual commitment? What about toward those engaged in a mission? Do you keep track of how they are doing or does your interest lag?

Responding to the News

This is a good time to think about how our faith is, on the one hand, "received" from those who've gone before and, on the other hand, "discovered" in our attempts to live faithfully in today's world. 


Friday, October 12, 2012

Even in the Postseason, Baseball Is a 'Game of Failure'


Last Sunday afternoon, the Washington Nationals began their postseason with a 3-2 victory over the defending World Champion St. Louis Cardinals. It was a messy win, with their ace pitcher, Gio Gonzalez, walking seven batters and their highest-paid player, Jayson Werth, failing to get a hit with the bases loaded -- twice!

"I don't really know how we won that game, to be honest," relief pitcher Craig Stammen told The Washington Post. "We pulled it out somehow, and that's kind of how the playoffs go."

In truth, that's kind of how baseball goes. It's a game of failure, with batters rarely getting hits more than 30% of the time. The last time a player hit more than 40% of the time over the course of a season was 1941, when Ted Williams of the Boston Red Sox had a .406 average (406 hits divided by 1000 at-bats).

"In their 3-2 victory," observed sportswriter Adam Kilgore, "the Nationals could not have played worse at times, but in the end they could not have felt better about it." Baseball, like life, includes a lot of mistakes and disappointments, but failures do not necessarily prevent us from emerging victorious. For example, the fact that Gio Gonzalez walked seven batters made him look bad as a pitcher, but it prevented the Cardinals from getting hits. A walked batter is not a hitting batter!

A baseball blogger named Dave, also known as "Bleacher Boy," is very philosophical about this. "Baseball is a huge game of failure," he writes. "You are guaranteed to fail." But individual failures do not mean that the team experiences a loss. He offers this example: "If while at bat, you advance a runner and he gets into scoring position, but you get out, do you fail? Absolutely not. Your batting average will be lower, which looks bad on the surface. However, you are part of a team whose goal is to score runs." If we judge success and failure only on individual performances, we miss the significance of team victories, which often require that one person get "out" in order to bring another person "home."

Flawless performances by individuals and teams are simply impossible in the game of baseball. As of Wednesday morning in the playoffs, the Nationals had won 1 and the Cardinals had won 1. The other National League Division Series was Reds 2, Giants 1. In the American League, the Tigers were ahead of the A's by a count of 2-1. And the Yankees were tied with the Orioles, 1-1. Every team had experienced both victories and losses in their quest to win 3 of 5 games.

In a New Yorker profile of Joe Girardi, the manager of the Yankees, journalist Gay Talese writes, "Like religion, the game of baseball is founded on aspirations rarely met. It generates far more failure than fulfillment." Girardi is an athlete whose life is built around his faith, which has nothing to do with whether his team wins or not. But his faith certainly has something to do with the way he survives in the baseball world, especially in the New York maelstrom.

Girardi is a father of three and has told the press that being a good father is more important to him than professional baseball. He expects the Yankees to be a family-friendly ball club, with players who are courteous to young fans. As a young man, Girardi discovered that "I was playing [baseball] because God gave me a gift, and I would be able to share God's good news through my gift and talent."

Talese reports that when "Girardi is not preoccupied with the health and performance of his team, his mind is often on his father, Gerald, who is now eighty-one and suffers from Alzheimer's, and lives in a nursing home." When the Yankees are playing in Chicago, Girardi will rent a car and drive 170 miles to spend an hour with his father.

"My dad was always there for me," Girardi told the Northwestern University alumni magazine in 1998. "He's the one who played catch with me, he was the one who took me to Cubs games where I could see my favorite players."

Whether the Yankees win the World Series this year or not, baseball men like Joe Girardi are clearly winners in the game of life.
More on this story can be found at these links:



The Big Questions
1. Rugged individualism has always been an American virtue. How does this affect our ability to handle personal failures?

2. Some say that "the perfect is the enemy of the good." Do you agree? How can perfectionism get in the way of progress?

3. When can personal disappointments actually contribute to overall success? Name some from your own experience.

4. You know the old saying, "It doesn't matter whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game." Is this true? What is most important about "how you play the game"?

5. When is it more important to focus on the success of the group than the performance of the individual?

6. From a Christian point of view, what is the significance of personal failure? How can it increase our faith in God?


Confronting the News with Scripture and Hope

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Genesis 38:26

"Then Judah acknowledged them and said, 'She is more in the right than I, since I did not give her to my son Shelah.' And he did not lie with her again." (For context, read 38:1-30.)

Judah does not obey the law which requires him to give his son to his widowed daughter-in-law Tamar. Later when she deceives him into thinking she is a prostitute, he sleeps with her, and then when she is found to be pregnant, he is ready to have her executed, until she confronts him with evidence that he is the one in the wrong. Then he admits his guilt and leaves her alone.
Questions: When does one personal failure lead to another, and what actions can stop this chain reaction? What kind of good can come out of evil?

2 Samuel 12:13

"David said to Nathan, 'I have sinned against the LORD.' Nathan said to David, 'Now the LORD has put away your sin; you shall not die.'" (For context, read 11:1--12:15.)

David commits adultery with Bathsheba, impregnating her, and has her husband Uriah killed. Then the prophet Nathan tells David the story of a rich man who takes advantage of a poor man. David becomes angry and says to Nathan, "The man who has done this deserves to die" (12:5). Nathan says to David, "You are the man!" (12:7).
Questions: Scripture, like baseball and life, is filled with success and failure. What are the lessons that we learn only from personal failure? How do we get back on the right track? What is God's role in this?

Luke 4:24

"And [Jesus] said, 'Truly I tell you, no prophet is accepted in the prophet's hometown." (For context, read 4:16-30.)

Jesus reads the scroll of the prophet Isaiah in the synagogue of his hometown of Nazareth, and then talks about the work of God in regions outside of Israel, which the people in the synagogue find insulting. They are filled with rage and attempt to throw Jesus off a cliff.
Questions: How is the "debut" of Jesus in Nazareth a personal failure? In what sense is it a success in the eyes of God? What lessons are learned, and what good comes out of it?

Mark 15:34

"At three o'clock Jesus cried out with a loud voice, 'Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?' which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'" (For context, read 15:33-41.)

When Jesus is crucified, he is in agony on the cross and cries out to God with an expression indicating how abandoned he feels, even by God. Then he dies, and the curtain of the temple is torn in two from top to bottom. The Roman centurion who watches him die says, "Truly this man was God's Son!" (v. 39).
Questions: In what sense is the crucifixion of Jesus a human failure? What do you think Jesus was feeling as he hung on the cross? What good came out of his death, both then and now?

John 6:65-66

"And [Jesus] said, 'For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father.' Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him." (For context, read 6:60-71.)

Many of the disciples of Jesus find that his teachings about eating his flesh are difficult. They find such words offensive. Jesus tells them that his words are "spirit and life" (v. 63), but some cannot believe. Peter affirms that Jesus has "the words of eternal life" (v. 68), but Jesus knows that one of them will betray him (v. 71).
Questions: Was it a disappointment that Jesus could not convince everyone to follow him? Although Judas betrayed him, how did this failure serve a larger purpose? When is it acceptable not to bat 1.000?

2 Corinthians 12:8-9

"Three times I appealed to the Lord about this, that it would leave me, but he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for power is made perfect in weakness.'" (For context, read 12:1-10.)

The apostle Paul says that he was given a thorn in the flesh to keep him from being too elated. He asks the Lord to remove it, but this request is declined. Paul learns that God's grace is sufficient, and discovers that "whenever I am weak, then I am strong" (v. 10).
Questions: How is God's grace sufficient for us? When have you found that strength can come out of vulnerability and weakness? Give examples.


For Further Discussion
1. What is the value of personal accomplishments compared to knowing Christ and living the life of a disciple?

2. Thousands of people drive by churches every Sunday morning and fail to come inside and hear the gospel message. Whose failure is this, and why?

3. What is the proper balance between personal success and group success? Are there dangers to valuing one over the other?

4. Jesus sacrificed himself for our salvation. What sacrifices are we asked to make for the good of others?

5. When have you seen a weakness turn into a strength? How do Christians "lead with a limp"?

6. In an achievement-oriented culture, how can we help children to see that there are things more important than winning games and achieving personal success?

7. What are the situations in your life when you have suffered deep disappointment? Did you move closer to God, or farther away? What good, if any, came out of these personal failures?  


Responding to the News

In the heat of a baseball playoff and a presidential campaign season, the focus is on winning. But such victory is not our call as Christians. Look at your family, your church and your community, and identify an area where you can sacrifice and serve.


Friday, October 5, 2012

50 Years Ago This Week: James Meredith Integrates Ole Miss


This week included the 50th anniversary of a landmark event in America's civil rights struggle: the enrollment on October 1, 1962, of James Meredith, a black man, in the University of Mississippi, an institution long closed to black people by the segregationist policies then in force in Mississippi.

Meredith's enrollment did not occur easily. With Ole Miss being a bastion of the Old South, and Mississippi Gov. Ross Barnett declaring he was a segregationist and proud of being so, the town of Oxford and the campus itself erupted in violence. It took the intervention of President John Kennedy, 30,000 U.S. troops, federal marshals and national guardsmen to get Meredith to class.

Although Meredith's demand for admission to the school was backed by a federal court order, Barnett had publicly vowed to keep him off the campus and had denounced the federal government. Behind the scenes, however, the governor was on the phone with President Kennedy trying to find a compromise.

Before the violence was over, two people had been killed and more than 200 were injured, including some 160 U.S. marshals. Some historians call the integration of the University of Mississippi the last battle of the Civil War.

Meredith not only enrolled in Ole Miss, but went on to receive a degree in political science, history and French from the school. He later said he sought entry into the university because he "was born in Mississippi and personally never lost the idea that it belonged to me and my kind."

These days, Meredith, now 79, often wears his Ole Miss baseball cap in public.

About 37 percent of Mississippians today are black, and 16.6 percent of the Ole Miss student body is black, as is the current student-body president, Kim Dandridge. She is the fourth black person elected to that position.

Although sometimes described as a civil-rights hero, Meredith rejects the label and dislikes the term "civil rights" because it implies that civil rights are somehow different from rights in general. As he sees it, he was fighting for his rights as an American citizen.

This week Ole Miss held several events to mark the anniversary of Meredith's history-making enrollment. Meredith was invited to attend, but declined, saying he didn't see the point. He remarked to the Associated Press that he'd "never heard of the French celebrating Waterloo" and asked, "Did you find anything 50 years ago that I should be celebrating?"

The university's officials, however, are quick to describe the observance as a commemoration, not a celebration.

Meredith has attended and participated in other events on the campus.

On his website, Meredith writes, "I have long recognized the folly of advocating a change simply because it is right, because it is humane, because it is Christian, because it is in the Constitution, or for any other nonpractical reason. I am aware of another important fact: if I were a white man, I would not give up my favored position unless there was an extremely good reason. The greatest hope for a major change in the basic status of African Americans is to convince the American whites that it is in their best interest. It is my firm conviction that the solution must result in the material improvement of both groups concerned ...." (Recognizing that some people say that today, the "white man" no longer has a "favored position," we would like to concentrate on Meredith's statement that positive changes involve seeking "the material improvement of both groups concerned.")

One TWW team member reports memories from growing up in the South: "My extended family was ethnic German, and more-or-less didn't really think too much about the Jim Crow laws and whatnot. All [family members] were and remained what would nowadays be called 'conservative.' While none were particularly activist -- and generally would naturally side with the 'law-and-order' side of things -- I can remember within the space of a few years the idea that 'all men are created equal' and 'who cares about skin color: we're all Americans' was a winning argument, and they then tried to live that way. In other words, it was the appeal to the Constitution and to Christianity that changed them from going with the Jim Crow flow, to thinking that Jim Crow laws were stupid at best, and evil at worst. (To be fair, being from a historically persecuted minority themselves probably was also a factor.)"

In his book Robert Kennedy and His Times, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. quotes Meredith as saying about his decision to enroll in Ole Miss, "Nobody handpicked me. I believed, and believe now, that I have a divine responsibility to break white supremacy in Mississippi ..." (p. 317).

More on this story can be found at these links:

Integrating Ole Miss: A Transformative, Deadly Riot. NPR
James Meredith Loathes "Civil Rights" Moniker. KnoxNews
James Meredith website
 
The Big Questions
1. Is Meredith right that advocating change because it is right, humane, Christian or in the Constitution is less effective than demonstrating that the change will "result in the material improvement of both groups concerned"? What about changes that Christianity advocates where "material improvement" cannot be demonstrated? What about resisting changes that benefit one group over another? What about resisting changes that Christianity opposes?

2. What is the difference between commemoration and celebration? Where does each belong in the practice of the Christian faith?

3. What outlooks did you once hold that the course of events in your lifetime has caused you to change? What outlooks has maturing spiritually caused you to abandon?

4. About what things within your power to influence do you consider yourself to have a "divine responsibility" to act?

5. While changes in society can be positive, negative or neutral, what resources do we have to help us decide which changes belong in which category (and thus, which ones we as Christians advocate and work for, oppose or simply accept)?

Confronting the News with Scripture and Hope

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Exodus 3:9-10

"The cry of the Israelites has now come to me; I have also seen how the Egyptians oppress them. So come, I will send you to Pharaoh to bring my people, the Israelites, out of Egypt." (For context, read 3:1-12.)

This is God speaking to Moses from the burning bush, telling him that he (God) has heard the cries of the enslaved Israelites and wants Moses to be the human instigator of the action to free them. Moses was being given a "divine responsibility." When he obeyed God, a lot of trouble and resistance followed, but he served as God's agent in breaking Egypt's stranglehold on Israel.
Questions: Clearly, God called Moses to foment change. Where else have you seen God's will expressed through forced changes in society? Off the top of your head, can you name other places in scripture where God advocates for the poor, the suffering and the oppressed? What does Jesus have to say on the subject?
Joshua 17:3-4
"Now Zelophehad ... had no sons, but only daughters .... They came before the priest Eleazar and Joshua son of Nun and the leaders, and said, 'The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance along with our male kin.' So according to the commandment of the LORD he gave them an inheritance among the kinsmen of their father." (For context, read 17:1-6.)

After dividing the land of Canaan between the tribes of Israel during the time of Joshua's leadership, sub-allotments had to be made to the individual clans and families. In normal cases, land was inherited by sons, but God had provided that, if a man had no son, then the daughter was to inherit. (There were also provisions in the case of childlessness; see Numbers 27:1-11.)

Here in Joshua, where the actual division of the land is taking place, Zelophehad's daughters remind Eleazar the priest and Joshua of God's commandment about it given through Moses. When reminded, Eleazar and Joshua comply. Although they live in a patriarchal society, it is apparent that the daughters were able to state their case and be heard successfully.
Questions: As an issue of justice, the plight of Zelophehad's daughters trumped the usual practice of only men inheriting land. What other issues can you think of where justice trumps the laws or practices of the state or your church? Compare this to the issues confronted in the civil rights struggle half a century ago, as well as struggles for rights in our time.
   
1 Samuel 3:10

"Now the LORD came and stood there, calling as before, 'Samuel! Samuel!' And Samuel said, 'Speak, for your servant is listening.'" (For context, read 3:1-18.)

This is from the account of God calling Samuel, and the circumstances make clear that God himself is a fomenter of change. The incident takes place at the end of the period of the judges, when there was as yet no king over Israel. The book of Judges, which describes that period, closes with these words: "In those days there was no king in Israel; all the people did what was right in their own eyes" (Judges 21:25). That's where things stand when 1 Samuel begins.

As a result of this free-for-all approach to religion, people weren't hearing much from God -- largely because they weren't interested in listening for him. Chapter 3 opens by saying, "The word of the LORD was rare in those days; visions were not widespread." The person on whom the practice of religion focused in those days was Eli, who was both a judge and the high priest. Samuel was a boy who had been dedicated by his mother to the service of God, and he was living in the worship place, likely carrying out cleaning and serving duties.

One night, the Lord called Samuel and told him that big changes were coming: Eli was out; Samuel was in. Eli had forfeited the blessing of God; God's blessing now fell on Samuel. God had been silent; he would be silent no more. Visions had not been widespread; well, hang on to your seats, because they were coming now. The old ways were over; God was breaking into their lives with a new beginning. Things were changing, and how!

This is not only a story about how we should listen for God; it's also a dramatic announcement of surprising change. And it tells us that one of the ways God works is through change. (See also Isaiah 43:19, where God declares, "I am about to do a new thing.")
Questions: What helps you to discern when God is the fomenter of a change occurring in society? What helps you discern when it is someone or something else fomenting the change? When God calls you to be an agent of change, does God have to call more than once to get your attention? Samuel had some difficulty recognizing that it was God speaking to him. Have you had such a difficulty when you thought God was pushing you in a difficult direction, especially with regard to issues of justice? Did someone help you to recognize whose voice was speaking, as Eli helped Samuel? Were you as willing as Eli to listen to uncomfortable news?

Ecclesiastes 3:1, 3, 7

"For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven: ... a time to break down, and a time to build up; ... a time to keep silence, and a time to speak ..." (For context, read 3:1-8.)

This sampling of lines from the well-known passage in Ecclesiastes 3 reminds us that in some circumstances, actions that promote or even force change can be the right thing to do.
Questions: How do you determine when it is a time to speak in favor of some unpopular change? How do you determine when it is a time to speak against some popular change? What do you say to some who might insist it is not time for certain rights to be granted to others? Do churches and communities, in your experience, tend to resist extending rights to others? When has your church been in the forefront? When has your church lagged with regard to issues of justice?

Galatians 3:28

"There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus." (For context, read 3:23-29.)

At the time Paul made this statement, it was quite radical. Paul knew that racial, gender and economic identity may not be erased legally because that would threaten the empire. But within the communion of Christ, such divisions have no place.
Questions: In light of what Paul said here, do you find it ironic that our churches tend to be ethnically and economically segregated? How have the histories of various denominations led to this? Does that kind of segregation call you to some paradigm-changing action? If so, what action?

For Further Discussion
1. When uncomfortable changes are being pushed in the culture around us, how can you determine if God might be working in them? And if you conclude that he is, what are some ways you can cooperate with those changes? If you conclude that the push is from evil desires, what are some ways consistent with your Christian witness that you can oppose such changes?

2. Respond to this: One day, Wilfred Grenfell, a medical missionary to Labrador, was the guest at a dinner in London with several socially prominent people. A woman seated next to him said, "Is it true, Dr. Grenfell, that you are a missionary?" Grenfell replied, "Is it true that you are not?"

3. Respond to this: Bishop Will Willimon tells this story on himself: He once received a frantic phone call from the parents of a young woman. The parents thought the young woman was throwing away her life, and they requested that the pastor talk some sense into her. So the pastor asked the young woman what had happened. She told him that she had decided to drop out of pharmacy school and devote her life to working with the children of migrant farmers. What in the world had motivated her to do such a radical thing? "It was your sermon yesterday that started me to thinking," she replied. In the sermon, the pastor had talked about how God wants us to do something important with our lives. She had decided that ministering to the children of migrant farm workers was something important and fulfilling she could do with her life. After a long silence the preacher stammered out, "But, Anne, I was just preaching!"

4. To get a feel for the time when Meredith was knocking on the door of Ole Miss, see Bob Dylan's song "Oxford Town" at www.bobdylan.com/us/songs/oxford-town.

Responding to the News
 
It's good to be aware that God may be acting in social changes surging around us, so that we take time to evaluate them carefully before deciding how we will respond.