Thursday, October 31, 2013

'Bling' Bishop's Lavish Mansion to Be Used to Serve the Needy

© 2013 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com

A week ago, Pope Francis suspended Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst, the Roman Catholic bishop of Limburg in Germany, from his duties after the 53-year-old church leader spent about $40 million of church money on renovations and new construction on his residence and diocesan offices, leading European media to dub Tebartz-van Elst the "bishop of bling." Now he faces the prospect of seeing his lavish mansion turned into a refuge center or soup kitchen to feed the homeless.
According to the blog "Whispers in the Loggia," big-ticket expenditures at the bishop's manor included "$475,000 spent on walk-in closets and a $20,000 bathtub."
The bishop's over-the-top spending on his own luxury sparked outrage among German Catholics. When the Vatican learned of what Tebartz-van Elst had done, he was summoned to Rome for a private audience with the pope, who is known for his modest lifestyle and advocacy for the poor. Two days later, a statement from the Vatican press office announced that the bishop had been placed on leave of absence while an investigation of his expenditures and deportment is underway.
"A situation has been created," read the statement, "in which Bishop Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst currently cannot exercise his episcopal ministry." ("Episcopal" here means "the work of a bishop.")
Informed observers say it is unusual for a Catholic church leader to be relieved of office before the results of the investigation are available. But that shows, says Mathew Schmalz, a religious studies professor at the College of the Holy Cross in Worchester, Massachusetts, that "Pope Francis says what he means and means what he says when he talks about Catholicism becoming a 'church of the poor.'"
After learning that the bishop's luxury home is likely to be repurposed to serve the needy, a spokesperson for the Caritas organization for the homeless said, "The residence is like an inherited sin which the bishop has left in his wake. People who seek sanctuary with us could be given food in the residence."
More on this story can be found at these links:
German 'Bishop of Bling's' Multi-Million Euro Mansion to Be Used to Serve Needy. The Independent
Pope Francis Authorizes Leave of Absence for 'Luxury' Bishop. National Catholic Reporter
'Bishop of Bling' Suspended by Pope Francis. NPR
The 'Bling Bishop' Exits... of Sorts. Whispers in the Loggia
The Big Questions
1. It's easy to criticize extravagant spending of church money on oneself when done by a church leader, but are there ways in which congregations in general do that? For example, is it easier to raise significant sums for remodeling the sanctuary than for supporting a migrant ministry? What are the reasons for or against your making a donation one way or the other? What do you conclude from these answers?
2. In terms of finances, should a pastor's lifestyle be about on par with the lifestyle of the average parishioner he or she serves? Should it be less or more than par? Why? How do you expect your pastor to appear in public? If you are a pastor, what is your standard for public appearance regarding the way you dress and the place you live?
3. Is there a point at which a Christian's affluence becomes sinful? If so, where is that point? Does how the money is earned factor into your answer? How does attitude relate?
4. Do churches have an obligation to help the poor? Why or why not? How do you react to the statements on the part of the pope that the Catholic Church is meant to be a church of the poor? Is yours a church of the poor? Should it be? How do you define poverty? Whom does your church serve? Who attends?
5. In terms of church architecture, some of what we spend is to make our houses of worship "beautiful for God." How much of that is appropriate? In terms of our ongoing spending on our church buildings, where is the line between expenditures for improvements that maintain a building's integrity, and those that satisfy our vanity, or what we imagine is appropriate reverence?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Luke 16:19-21
There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day. And at his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who longed to satisfy his hunger with what fell from the rich man's table .... (For context, read 16:19-31.)
These are the opening lines of Jesus' parable of the rich man and Lazarus. We note that the rich man is not condemned for being rich, but for neglecting the poor man at his gate. What made the rich man's wealth "obscene" was not the extremes between the earthly circumstances of the two men, but that he saw no need to use some of his wealth to help the poor man.
In applying this parable to the "bishop of bling" story, we don't know that the bishop was ignoring the poor; he may have been overseeing some good work for the needy. But what seems clear is that he was spending more of the church's money to lavishly improve his own circumstances than to improve the circumstances of the needy in his diocese.
Questions: How does Jesus' parable of the rich man and Lazarus make you feel? Why? Is there a great disparity between rich and poor in your community? What efforts are made to bridge the gap? Who in your community (include yourself if you choose) would be grateful to receive the "crumbs," however you define them? Who (include yourself if you choose) has more than enough to be shared?
Luke 8:14
As for what fell among the thorns, these are the ones who hear; but as they go on their way, they are choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of life, and their fruit does not mature. (For context, read 8:4-8, 11-15.)
Assuming the facts of the Bishop Tebartz-van Elst story are accurate as reported, this might be a good verse for him to meditate upon. He presumably chose to enter the ministry because the seed of God's word had fallen upon the soil of his heart. But possibly the fruit of that seed has not matured because it was choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of life.
Questions: What good seed in your life is being choked by the cares or riches or pleasures of life? How is it being choked by having too little? How is it being choked by having too much? In what ways do you work to clear such chokers?
Luke 18:14
... for all who exalt themselves will be humbled, but all who humble themselves will be exalted. (For context, read 18:9-14.)
This is the "moral of the story" line from Jesus' parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector. The hubris of the Pharisee is set in stark contrast to the humility and repentance of the tax collector.
It seems likely that anyone who thinks he needs a $20,000 bathtub -- assuming the report is correct and is not talking about the renovation of an entire bathroom -- paid for with money collected for the overall work of the church has some problems with humility.
Question: What is your definition of what it means to humble yourself? In what areas do you have to fight against a sense of entitlement in order to follow Jesus' urging to humble yourself?
1 Timothy 6:9-10
But those who want to be rich fall into temptation and are trapped by many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, and in their eagerness to be rich some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pains. (For context, read 6:6-10.)
In a sermon last month, Pope Francis said, "When a person is attached to money, he destroys himself, he destroys the family. Money destroys! It does, doesn't it? It binds you. Money serves to bring about many good things, so many works for human development, but when your heart is attached in this way, it destroys you."
Question: The first of the two verses above says that wanting to be rich can cause temptations that lead to being trapped by "senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction." When have you actually observed or experienced "ruin and destruction" as a result of possessions? Regardless of where you are on the economic continuum, what do you need to do to avoid such ruin and destruction?
1 Peter 2:5
... like living stones, let yourselves be built into a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. (For context, read 2:1-10.)
God calls us to be "living stones" and to allow ourselves to "be built into a spiritual house."
There's a legend that as a deacon in Rome, Lawrence (A.D. 225-258) was charged with responsibility for the material goods of the church and the distribution of alms to the poor. As Wikipedia tells it, "St. Ambrose of Milan relates that when St. Lawrence was asked for the treasures of the church, he brought forward the poor, among whom he had divided the treasure as alms. 'Behold in these poor persons the treasures which I promised to show you; to which I will add pearls and precious stones, those widows and consecrated virgins, which are the church's crown.' The prefect [chief administrator of the city of Rome] was so angry that he had a great gridiron prepared, with coals beneath it, and had Lawrence's body placed on it (hence St. Lawrence's association with the gridiron). After the martyr had suffered the pain for a long time, the legend concludes, he made his famous cheerful remark, 'I'm well done. Turn me over!' From this derives his patronage of cooks and chefs."
Questions: In what ways should the actual house we live in reflect our being part of God's spiritual house? In what ways should the house (church building) we worship in reflect our being part of God's spiritual house?
For Further Discussion
1. Comment on this, from a TWW team member: "The church I served in Indiana was built on the model of the meetinghouse. It had some limitations, but it didn't prevent us from having programs that impacted the community, nor did it stop us from having joint services, Bible studies and vacation Bible schools with another church in town. Not only that, but it was in that simple meetinghouse that Dan West got up to propose the founding of Heifer Project, which initially was a Brethren program, but is now Heifer International, an ecumenical agency that sends live impregnated animals to people all around the globe and has had an immense influence on world hunger. So you don't need a fancy building to do God's work or reverently approach God."
2. Respond to this, from the same team member: "Clear glass rather than stained glass is what we have in meetinghouses. That can be a disadvantage, however. Like the Sunday when I noticed that people really weren't paying attention to my sermon, but kept stealing glances out the windows. I learned later that the farmer across the street had rented a bull, who was happily fulfilling his mission with several of the cows. Stained glass windows might have been a better option that morning, although not nearly as entertaining."
3. How might Jesus' parable of the rich fool in Luke 12:13-21 apply to today's lesson? Think especially about verses 18-20: "Then he said, 'I will do this: I will pull down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.' But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life is being demanded of you. And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?"
4. Discuss the architecture of your church. What are its advantages and disadvantages? How does it compare with other churches you've attended?
5. Respond to this, from another TWW team member: "Religion has the potential to fall victim to the arrogance that sees only a grander show for the clergy person, not for God. One expression I see is the massive crosses in front of many churches across the southern USA [the TWW member lives in the South]. Some churches seek to make their crosses taller than the others in the areas. When churches are within sight of each other, it can reach absurd proportions, trying to outdo one another. The same goes for the buildings."
Responding to the News
This is a good time to consider, prayerfully, you relationship with possessions, money and housing, and the lifestyle you lead. What does God say to you about your circumstances?
Closing Prayer

Day by day
Day by day
Oh, dear Lord
Three things I pray
To see thee more clearly
Love thee more dearly
Follow thee more nearly
Day by day
--Ascribed to St. Richard of Chichester (1197-1253) and G.R. Bullock-Webster (1913), as worded in the musical [ITALIC]Godspell (1971).

Thursday, October 24, 2013

While Writing About Underdogs, Author Rediscovers Faith

© 2013 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com

Malcolm Gladwell is a staff writer for The New Yorker and the author of four books on The New York Times bestseller list, all dealing with unexpected implications of social science research. This month, his fifth book came out. Titled David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants, this one delves into psychology, history, science, business and politics. But unlike his previous volumes, this book also includes underlying faith-related themes. What's more, Gladwell acknowledges that in the process of writing the book, he rediscovered his own Christian faith after having drifted away.
The book comes at the idea of power from the side of those usually considered at a disadvantage. He suggests, for example, that in some situations, coming from a traumatic childhood or having a disability may actually give a person the upper hand. Among other stories, Gladwell tells of people facing great adversity who were able to do extraordinary things because, like David confronting Goliath, they were armed with faith.
Gladwell was raised in a Mennonite family in Canada, but admits that he had drifted from his Christian roots. Researching and writing this book, however, "brought me back into the fold," he said.
"I was so incredibly struck in writing these stories by the incredible power faith had in people's lives, it has made a profound impact on me in my belief. That's been the completely unexpected effect of writing this book," Gladwell said in an interview with Religion News Service (RNS). "I am in the process of rediscovering my own faith again."
When asked by the interviewer if he would now call himself a Christian, Gladwell answered, "I would." He has long had a disclosure statement on his website describing his perspective on life, and one of the declarations there is "I believe in God." But now, his theism is specifically tied to Christianity.
The RNS interviewer also asked Gladwell if he'd had "some kind of personal conversion experience." The author replied, "I realized what I had missed. It wasn't an 'I woke up one morning' kind of thing. It was a slow realization [of] something incredibly powerful and beautiful in the faith that I grew up with that I was missing. Here I was, writing about people of extraordinary circumstances, and it slowly dawned on me that I can have that too."

More on this story can be found at these links:
Malcolm Gladwell on His Return to Faith While Writing 'David and Goliath.' RNS
Why Entrepreneurs Should Read Malcolm Gladwell's 'David and Goliath.' Forbes
Malcolm Gladwell website
The Big Questions

1. What has been your own experience of faith in God and Christ? Has it been a constant reality in your life, or have there been undulations -- ups and downs? If the latter, what does that mean?
2. Do you think Gladwell's research for his most recent book would have drawn him to become a Christian if he did not already have a Christian background? Why or why not?
3. To what degree is faith in God a decision of the will rather than an assurance of the heart? Is our faith any less effective if it is a matter of choice rather than a matter of inspiration? Can faith be both?
4. In what sense does faith give one power? Is it merely "faith," or does it have to be faith in Christ Jesus? Explain your answer. Discuss the following: Technically, faith always has an object; it is faith in someone or something .
5. In what ways is faith liberating? Does faith create a burden or relieve burdens? Does it sometimes do both? Explain your answer.
6. To what degree should faith be supported by reasonable grounds for belief? Should faith ever be belief against material evidence to the contrary?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Proverbs 22:6 (NIV)
Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it. (For context, read 22:5-6.)
This verse should not be read as an iron-clad guarantee -- most of us know of people brought up in the faith who departed permanently from it. But there is a truth that Christian faith taught early and modeled well by adults is not forgotten even if it is forsaken.
TWW team member Cliff Harrington comments, "Proverbs tells us to 'train a child in the way he should go ... and when he is old he won't depart from it.' It appears to me that the use of the world 'should' is remarkably strategic. The Scripture does not say '... in the way you've learned over the years,' or 'in the way that you deem is best,' or any other linguistic form that would allow us to ignore God's way. I take the word 'should,' in this case, to mean there is an unnegotiable way that should be planted in our hearts and minds as children. I'm intrigued that the language of that verse does not set a standard of perfection. It's as though the writer understands that we humans can know what we should do, and even acknowledge what we should do, and still opt to do that which we shouldn't do."
Harrington adds, "Yet, the writer also seems to understand that wisdom comes with maturity, and with maturity and wisdom comes a desire to do what we 'should' do. ... I think Malcolm Gladwell would be Exhibit A in an argument that his parents were good teachers of God's way. Somewhere in his being, there were some lessons about what he 'should' do, and he himself links that to his Mennonite upbringing."
Questions: Where did you learn about what you "should" do? Has maturity caused you to affirm what you learned, reject what you learned or adapt what you learned? Explain your answer.
Mark 9:24
I believe; help my unbelief! (For context, read 9:14-29.)
This statement is from a father whose son had dangerous seizures. He brought the boy to Jesus and asked if Jesus could help. Jesus responded that all things can be done for the one who believes. At that, the father replied, "I believe; help my unbelief!"
That divided-mind answer is probably characteristic of many followers of Jesus if truth be told. Many people lean strongly toward Jesus and work to follow him, while at the same time, they have competing thoughts of uncertainty. Some say that such a divided mind is a description of what it means to be human.
The point to note from the story, however, is that this certain-uncertain expression of faith was enough. Based on it, Jesus was able to heal the man's son.
Questions: In what areas of following Jesus do you experience the divided mind? How do you deal with the waxing and waning of faith? When you struggle with your faith, do you reach out to God (as did the man in this gospel story), or does the very fact that you are struggling make it difficult to reach out to a God you may doubt?
Was there a time when you drifted away from your faith? Assuming your participation in church now means you have come back, at least partially, to your faith, what event or interaction restored your faith? Do you continue to struggle with faith and "drift"?
Luke 24:21
But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since these things took place. (For context, read 24:13-35.)
This comment was made by one of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, following the crucifixion of Jesus. The two were talking to another "man" whom they met on the road, who was, in fact, the resurrected Jesus, but they didn't recognize him. The comment above was an expression, at least, of deep disappointment, but probably also of faith lost. "But we had hoped that Jesus was the one to redeem Israel" (that is, the Messiah). What's unsaid is, "But now the one in whom we had believed -- and thus our hope -- is gone."
Jesus, still unrecognized, then accepted their invitation to dine with them, and as he blessed bread and gave it them, they suddenly knew who he was. Surely that was a faith-returning moment.
TWW team member Frank Ramirez says, "When I was in college and read this gospel story, I suddenly realized I could look back and find Jesus walking with me, even when I was unaware of his presence. This event took place 3,000 miles from home, reading the New Testament in a tent while traveling with other college students performing a play for various congregations and camps about the founding of our denomination. Since then I have tried to be aware I am walking on the road to Emmaus, and I should assume Jesus is walking with me."
Questions: If our sinking faith is not to be met with such dramatic new "sightings" of Jesus, what other things might awaken it again? How can we best make use of such faith-awakeners? Do you experience the presence of Jesus in the present? Is your hindsight closer to 20/20, as you realize where God's guidance made itself felt in your past?
John 14:1
Do not let your hearts be troubled. Believe in God, believe also in me. (For context, read 14:1-7.)
When Jesus speaks of the "heart" in the verse above, we usually assume he is talking solely about feelings. However, in that day, the word heart, kardia (from which we get "cardiac"), was thought to be more the seat of rational thought than of feelings.
Questions: Do you think there should be a strong rational element to conversion? How important are feelings, especially in terms of a strong emotional response to an evangelistic invitation?
Colossians 2:6-7
As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, just as you were taught, abounding in thanksgiving. (For context, read 2:6-15.)
These verses present a good definition of what it means to be a Christian -- having received Christ, continuing to live our lives in him, rooted and built up in him, established in the faith, as the result of teaching by the church and family.
Questions: What else needs to be added here to make this a complete definition of what it means to be a Christian, especially once we are beyond the excitement or uplift of our initial commitment to Christ? How do we put down roots into the faith in order to be strongly anchored during the storms of life?
For Further Discussion
1. What might it look like to be faithful to God during a period when our faith is at a low tide?
2. Comment on this, from TWW team member Frank Ramirez, who writes occasional meditations for The Upper Room devotional magazine: "Several years ago I wrote one I called 'The Siege' about a very difficult summer in my ministry when I struggled with real doubt about the faith. There seemed to be a dark voice that suggested that the world I saw was all there is, and that I was wasting my time. Then one evening, as I drove back home and saw the sun setting beautifully behind corn fields still a month away from harvest, I thought to myself, 'If this is all there is, then God is worth praising.' The siege was lifted, and I felt supported by God. I got several letters from folks who had drifted away from the faith and had returned, and were glad to find they were not alone. But the magazine also got some letters from folks who thought it was totally inappropriate for Christians to admit doubt, and especially for Christian magazines to print such things."
3. Early on, John and Charles Wesley, founders of Methodism, said that every Christian should experience assurance of their faith. Yet later John wrote, "When 50 years ago my brother Charles and I, in [the] simplicity of our hearts, told the good people of England that unless they knew their sins were forgiven, they were under the wrath and curse of God, I marvel ... that they did not stone us!" What do you think caused John to rethink assurance?
Responding to the News
It can be good for our spiritual health to recognize that the ebb and flow of faith is a common experience for Christians and should not be taken as a sign that there is no God or that if there is one, he is angry with us. In fact, many great saints of the past spoke of having a "dark night of the soul" when they felt separated from God but continued to serve him nonetheless. Some later were able to sense a reconnection.
Closing Prayer
Be with us, O Lord, through the ups and downs of our faith, that we may nonetheless walk in the way that we should go. In Jesus' name. Amen.

Thursday, October 17, 2013

A Tattooed Jesus Provides Evangelical Message, but Offends Some

 © 2013 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com

Several billboards around Lubbock, Texas, are currently displaying a shirtless Christ with arms outstretched, wearing a crown of thorns and covered with tattooed words including "outcast," "fear," "addicted," "useless," "faithless," "stressed out" and other negative terms. The accompanying caption reads, "Marked by our past. Transformed by love," and directs viewers to the website jesustattoo.org.
Glancing at the signs, a passing motorist might think the ads are promoting a tattoo parlor that specializes in inking Jesus-themed art, but in fact, the billboards are part of an effort to spread an evangelical message about salvation through Christ.
Those who go online to the site find a 6-minute video that shows a modern-day Jesus, starting a day tattoo-less. He dons a long-sleeve shirt and goes to his basement tattoo studio where all day long, people come in tattooed with one or another of the negative terms. In each case, "Jesus" re-inks them with a positive term; for example, a young man tattooed with "outcast" leaves marked "accepted," and a woman who arrives marked "self-righteous" leaves inked "humble."
At the end of the day, Jesus is obviously exhausted, and when he removes his shirt, he is emblazoned with all of the negative terms he removed from those who came to him that day. A voice-over then explains that "life leaves its etchings" on us but that we don't have to be defined by the marks of our past, and says, "One man proclaimed a revolutionary message of love and forgiveness ... for those labeled as outcasts and unlovable." The narrator goes on to tell of Jesus' suffering for the sins of others so that they might be saved and gives an invitation to accept Christ.
The "About Us" link on the website says that the campaign is the effort of "people amazed by the love of Jesus," but claims no affiliation with any religious group. The page further reads, "It really is as simple as it appears. We are a small group of people humbled by the love of Jesus. We are not a church. We are not selling anything. We encourage you to tell as many people as possible. That's it."
One older man interviewed by a local radio station labeled the signs as "derogatory" and another described them as "blasphemous," though it's not clear from such a small sampling that these two are representative of their generations. People from younger generations who responded were more positive, however. That variance in responses may reflect the difference in attitude toward tattoos in general along generational divides. A 2009 Pew Research Poll of Americans found that more than half of Americans 50 and older view the current popularity of tattooing in general as "a change for the worse." In contrast, a 2007 Pew study found that more than one-third of people ages 18-25 have a tattoo.
More on this story can be found at these links:
Jesus Tattoo Billboard: Blasphemous or a Blessing? Christian Science Monitor
Ad Campaign With Tattooed Jesus Gets Lots of Ink, Not All of It Positive. AdWeek
JesusTattoo.org
The Big Questions
1. How do you picture Jesus? How does how you picture Jesus impact your faith? How important is his physical appearance? Does it matter if your image of Jesus is not how other believers view him? Why? Does your Jesus share your presuppositions and cultural baggage? How is your Jesus different from you? Would your Jesus appeal to other people?
2.Had Jesus been born in today's world, what are some reasons he might or might not have a tattoo or tattoos? If he had a tattoo, what might it say? Is there anything about using a tattooed image that is sacrilegious? What other artistic depictions of Jesus have challenged you, offended you, delighted you and/or caused you to think?
3. The video demonstrates the metaphoric meaning behind the tattooed Jesus on the billboard (and one TWW team member declares the idea "ingenious"). What are some other ways Christians can portray Christ that make him more relatable to non-believers? Is that part of our responsibility, or are we to let the Gospel speak for itself in a traditional way? What are some "traditional ways"? Were they always traditional?
4. To what degree can our outward appearance -- including how we dress -- project our faith? Might someone wear a tattoo as a Christian testimony? Are tattoos and body piercings right or wrong in and of themselves, or does our motive for having or not having them determine their value?
5. In what ways, if any, might the message conveyed by the video be redemptive for people? In what ways, if any, might it harm the gospel message?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Leviticus 19:28
You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you: I am the LORD. (For context, read 19:26-31.)
The prohibition against gashing the flesh for the dead was based on the practices of other nations in which gashing the skin was a conduit for contacting the dead and a means of appeasing demons with the shed human blood of the living to keep them from tormenting the corpse. In the context verses, practicing witchcraft and turning to mediums and wizards -- all supposed means of contacting the dead -- were also forbidden.
The Hebrew word translated "tattoo," however, is not as clear as the translation indicates. The word is found nowhere else in the Bible -- nor in other Hebrew literature from that era -- and a literal partial-translation would be "make no written qa'aqa' on yourselves." The qa'aqa' may be either a brand (people, as well as cattle, were branded in those days) or a tattoo, and there is some evidence that it specifically refers to either a mark placed on a slave to indicate status (as a slave) or ownership. (The King James Version translates qa'aqa' as "marks.") Even so, the possibility remains that qa'aqa' may be a general word for what we call a "tattoo."
Questions: How would you advise a young person today who was considering getting a tattoo? Why? What purpose(s) do tattoos serve in our culture today? Are they sinful? Do you or others in your group have tattoos? Do you or other people you know regret having had a tattoo? What would this tattooed Jesus have to say to the folks you know who have tattoos?
Isaiah 53:4-5
Surely he has borne our infirmities and carried our diseases; yet we accounted him stricken, struck down by God, and afflicted. But he was wounded for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the punishment that made us whole, and by his bruises we are healed. (For context, read 52:13--53:12.)
2 Corinthians 5:21
For our sake [God] made [Jesus] to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (No context necessary.)
Isaiah 52:13--53:12 is one of four passages in Isaiah that Bible scholars refer to as "songs of the suffering" and which tell of a "suffering servant" forced to endure shame and suffering on behalf of others. Many people believe that at the time of the writing, the "servant" referred to the nation of Israel itself, suffering so that God could redeem all nations. From the first century on, however, the church has seen this passage as referring to Jesus, especially in light of the vicarious suffering he endured. John, for example, quotes Isaiah 53:1 in connection with signs Jesus performed (see John 12:38). Peter quotes Isaiah 53:9 in relationship to Jesus' suffering (see 1 Peter 2:22). And the deacon Philip explains Isaiah 53:7-8 to the Ethiopian official as applying to Jesus (see Acts 8:29-35).
Questions: In what ways does the tattooed-Jesus video visualize the theme of this Isaiah passage? How does 2 Corinthians 5:21  (above) connect with the Isaiah passage?
Matthew 16:13-15
Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, "Who do people say that the Son of Man is?" And they said, "Some say John the Baptist, but others Elijah, and still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" (For context, read 16:13-20.)
"But who do you say that I am?" That was the question Jesus put to his disciples. It's also a question that the tattooed-Jesus video indirectly asks.
Questions: How do you answer Jesus' question? In what ways do you share your answer with others? Is it possible to answer Jesus' question in one sentence? Does that exhaust who Jesus is? Do you think your answer is helpful to people who may not know Jesus yet? What answer would speak to those who are searching?
Matthew 23:25-26
Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the plate, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. You blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup, so that the outside also may become clean. (For context, read 23:23-28.)
Jesus here redefines what it means to be "clean" or "unclean." One TWW team member commented, "Jesus did not hesitate to be seen with sinners and to go where sinners could be found. And since he was not ashamed to be touched by women who anointed him, or speak with a Samaritan woman at the well, or touch sick people or dead people -- all of which were no-no's -- I could see Jesus redefining clean and unclean by wearing a tattoo and being seen with the people who wear tattoos. That might mean he would not be hanging around in the haunts I frequent, but he doesn't need to reach out to us church people. Hopefully, he's already got us (although, as we see in the gospels, some of us who ought to get it, don't get it). So actually, though I don't have a tattoo, and definitely don't want a tattoo, I have no problem visualizing a contemporary Jesus sporting a tattoo."
Questions: Why would Jesus be more concerned about what's etched on our heart (inside the cup) than what's inked on our skin (outside the cup)? How does the term "skin deep" apply to this Scripture text?
1 Corinthians 9:20-22
To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though I myself am not under the law) so that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (though I am not free from God's law but am under Christ's law) so that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, so that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some. (For context, read 9:19-23.)
These comments from Paul are part of a larger section in which he refers to his "rights" as an apostle, one who had actually "seen" the Lord (in his Damascus road vision). But his point is that rather than assert his rights, he has chosen to make himself "a slave to all, so that I might win more of them" (v. 19). In other words, as the verses above suggest, he did what was necessary to enable people from various cultures and walks of life to hear and relate to his gospel message.
Questions: Do you think the tattooed-Jesus video is a [ITALIC] God-pleasing way to enable people who might not otherwise hear and relate to the gospel? Why or why not? In what way do you alter your outlook or cultural assumptions in order to be able to serve others in the name of Jesus?
For Further Discussion
1. Comment on this: Marianne Sawicki, the author of Seeing the Lord (Fortress Press, 1994), is convinced that human beings can copy a biblical text in one of two ways. First, we can copy a text onto paper or onto audiotape or even onto our skin. Or, we can copy a text into our own bodies, gestures and words. In this case, the writing is internal, and our bodies are modified to carry the pattern of the text.
2. Read to your class the lyrics of the Christmas song "Some Children See Him," and invite comments in light of how we "see" Jesus.
3. Respond to this, from a TWW team member: "One of my nephews is a tattoo artist who has started to emphasize biblical scenes more in his work as he has returned to the church of his grandparents. After my father died, my daughter had a tattoo added to her collection in his memory. I have no tattoos, but I observe the younger generation and have concluded that this particular form of advertising can be dangerous (gang symbols) or represent life-affirming associations. In my jail ministry, I often see prisoners whose lives are revealed in their tattoos; old girlfriends, drug addictions, poor choices and Christian symbols share space on the same arm or face."
4. One TWW team member put this spin on 1 Peter 1:18-19: "You know that you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your ancestors, not with perishable things [like skin paintings] ..., but with the [tattoo-like indelible] blood of Christ ...." What do you think?
Responding to the News
Whether or not you like the tattooed-Jesus video, this is a good time to consider in what ways your church can present the gospel to those beyond its walls that would be likely to hook people's interest and enable them to see their need for Christ.
Closing Prayer

O Lord, help us to see Jesus as clearly as we can, that we may receive him as Savior, follow him as example, learn from him as teacher and serve him as Master. In his name. Amen.

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Linsanity Spotlights Jeremy Lin as NBA Star and as a Christian

 © 2013 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com

The movie Linsanity, which hits a limited number of movie screens across the nation this weekend, tells of the rise of 6-foot-6 Asian-American NBA player Jeremy Lin to basketball stardom. In narrating the story, the film shows Lin as a Christian believer. Even the movie's title, Linsanity, hints at what's coming, as the "t" is designed as a cross.
Because we're writing this before the movie is released, we can't speak definitively about what it contains, but according to Amy Nicholson, film critic for [LA Weekly, it tracks "the trials and tribulations [Lin] endured on his path to a three-year, $25-million contract with the Houston Rockets." Nicholson also says the movie "doesn't -- and shouldn't -- hide its star's religious beliefs."
Those "trials and tribulations" (Nicholson's term, not Lin's) include Lin's not being offered a college scholarship to play basketball, being passed over in the NBA draft out of Harvard University and then, after receiving a partially guaranteed contract deal in 2010 with his hometown Golden State Warriors, his mostly riding the bench and spending time in the Development League. The following preseason, he was waived by the Warriors and the Rockets before joining the New York Knicks early in the 2011-12 season. But there he seldom was sent on the court and spent time in the D-League. That all changed in February 2012, when he unexpectedly led a winning streak for the Knicks and was promoted to the starting lineup. This led to the worldwide following dubbed "Linsanity." In 2012, Lin signed the contract with the Rockets.
Lin is one of only a few Asian Americans in NBA history, and he's the first American of Chinese or Taiwanese descent to play in the league. Several observers believe that his ethnicity caused him to be under-recruited as a basketball player because Asians are more often stereotyped as math and science whizzes than as athletes.
In an interview with The Christian Post about the movie, the interviewer asked, "In the NBA, you've played for teams in San Francisco, New York, and now you are in Houston. How are you handling these transitions?"
Lin's response suggests he believes God to be leading him: "For me it's just where God calls me to be, and as long as I know that, I will have peace deep down inside even though I might not enjoy what's going on or not enjoy what just happened, or whatever; as long as I know I'm where God wants me to be, that's the most important thing. In my life, he has taken me to a lot of different places and a lot of unexpected turns, but at the end, he's been faithful through it all."
Nicholson's review also picks up that view. She quotes Lin, referring to the tough times before his breakout success with the Knicks, saying, "I know God orchestrated the whole thing. Nothing in my life will happen that's not according to God's plan.

More on this story can be found at these links:
NBA's Jeremy Lin Talks About Faith, Fame, and Racism. Religion News Service
Jeremy Lin on Embracing 'Linsanity' Spotlight, Where God Wants Him to Be. Christian Post
Linsanity Examines Jeremy Lin as an Asian-American NBA Star, and a Christian. LA Weekly
Linsanity: the Movie
The Big Questions
1. As a follower of Jesus, how do you interpret the ups and downs of your life? Are they part of God's plan for you? Does God actually have individual plans for us? Tell what you base your answer on.
2. Does God call some people to lucrative sports careers? If so, why might God do that?
3. Would you attribute the slow start of Lin's pro-basketball career to God's will? With so many young adults going through slow career starts, is there something God wants all of them to learn, or are such starts simply a reflection of the state of the economy and the job market, having nothing to do with faith? Can it be "both-and"? If so, how? Explain your answer.
4. One of the online commenters, responding to the LA Weekly review of the movie, took issue with Lin's statement "I know God orchestrated this whole thing" by saying, "So God, who ignores the Billion ills happening in the World at any given moment, decided [Lin] becoming a Millionaire Basketball Player was a huge priority? Religious people slay me." How would you reply to that person? Does Matthew 10:29-31 help answer the question?
5. When have you been convinced that some course of action was God's will for you? How did you know?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Amos 7:14-15
Then Amos answered Amaziah, "I am no prophet, nor a prophet's son; but I am a herdsman, and a dresser of sycamore trees, and the LORD took me from following the flock, and the LORD said to me, 'Go, prophesy to my people Israel.'" (For context, read 7:14-17.)
After Amos the prophet spoke a hard prophecy against the people of Bethel in Israel, the chief priest of Bethel, Amaziah, told Amos to go home to Judah and tell them about their sins, but leave Israel alone. Amos responded with the words above.
To put Amos' reply into a contemporary setting, Amos was saying, "Look, I'm not preaching here because I've got a yen to be a minister. I'm a layperson, a farmer, but God has called me to speak to this situation, and I've got to obey him." He was saying that his life had taken an unexpected turn. He never imagined that he would ever do anything other than herd sheep and tend sycamore trees. Yet here he was, preaching for God in another country.
Questions: When we end up doing something we didn't expect or prepare for, how do we determine if the unexpected change was God's idea? How do we test what we think might be a call from God?
Matthew 12:50
For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother. (For context, read 12:46-50.)
Romans 8:28 (NIV)
And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. (For context, read 8:18-30.)
That God has a definite will in some things is clear from Scripture. Jesus spoke the words above on a day when he was out teaching some crowds. Someone interrupted to tell him that his mother and brothers were at the edge of the crowd, wanting to speak to him. We're not told whether Jesus eventually went to them or not, but his first response was to point to the crowd and say, "Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother" (vv. 49-50).
So Jesus plainly says that God has a will to which we should conform (See also the Lord's Prayer: "Your kingdom come. Your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven" --Matthew 6:10.) There's no question that God's will for all of us is that we should live righteously and love our neighbor.
Yet in Romans, Paul seems to imply that whether or not we follow God's specific guidance, God will work things out for the good -- note, not necessarily for the best. That may imply that God has less of a specific plan than a promise to be with us as we use our gifts, talents and decisions in life.
Question: Beyond God's general will for all of us, does God have a detailed plan, individually tailored, for each of us that includes what sort of job we should take, whether and who we should marry and how many children we should have, whether we would should pursue a basketball career and so on?
Acts 18:20-21
When they asked him to stay longer, he declined; but on taking leave of them, he said, "I will return to you, if God wills." Then he set sail from Ephesus. (For context, read 18:18-21.)
"... if God wills." Clearly the apostle Paul, the speaker in the verse above, believed God had an individual will for him regarding where he should go.
Question: In what ways do you try to determine what God wants you to do?
James 4:13-15
Come now, you who say, "Today or tomorrow we will go to such and such a town and spend a year there, doing business and making money." Yet you do not even know what tomorrow will bring. ... Instead you ought to say, "If the Lord wishes, we will live and do this or that." (For context, read 4:13-17.)
Question: Do you think James was saying that God has a plan customized for each one of us, or is he simply saying that God's will trumps our own? Explain your answer.
Genesis 50:20
Even though you intended to do harm to me, God intended it for good, in order to preserve a numerous people, as he is doing today. (For context, read 50:15-21.)
When Joseph's brothers had betrayed him and sold him into slavery, they never imagined that their act would result in Joseph becoming highly placed in the government of Egypt. That was an unexpected consequence. But Joseph interprets their deed as a means for God's will to be accomplished.
Question: How does hindsight figure into our understanding of God's will?
For Further Discussion
1. Does God care about our minor decisions, such as what clothes you decided to wear to church today or what food you had for lunch yesterday? Are there any circumstances when such decisions might actually not be as minor as they seem? If so, does that change your answer about whether God cares about them? Explain.
2. Comment on this, seen on a large banner hanging in a church: On the banner is a large footprint, and across it are the words, "The sign of God is that we are led where we did not intend to go."
3. Tell what role you think God played in these decisions: what career or job you chose; whom, or whether, you married; how many children you have, if any; and your choice to attend your present church.
Responding to the News
You might arrange to take your youth group to see Linsanity, or make plans for your TWW group or another group of adults to attend together. If you do, be sure to arrange for a time following to discuss, from a biblical perspective, what they saw and heard. It may also be helpful to discuss where you think Lin still has room to mature spiritually.   Closing Prayer
O God, help us to live faithfully your general will for us all. And when you have a specific intention for us, help us to be attentive to it and respond in a positive way. In Jesus' name. Amen.

Saturday, October 5, 2013

American Churches Silent as Christianity Threatened With Extinction in Middle East

© 2013 The Wired Word
                                                                                                                                                                                www.thewiredword.com

According to an Associated Press report of the terrorist attack on the mall in Nairobi, Kenya, last month that left more than 70 people dead, the Somali Islamic militant group "separated Muslims from other people and let the Muslims go free." Witnesses said that the gunmen determined which shoppers were Muslim by asking the captives questions about Islam. If they couldn't answer, they were shot or tortured to death. Kenyan soldiers reported bodies with eyes gouged out and hung from ceiling hooks, castrated men, fingers removed with pliers, hands sharpened "like a pencil" and other horrors.
Sadly, this singling out of non-Muslims for persecution and death is no isolated incident in the Middle East and some parts of Africa today, and many Christians are among the victims. In fact, Christianity itself is often under attack throughout the region, to the point that some observers are now talking about the coming extinction of Christianity in the Middle East. Western churches, however, have said little about the slaughter.
Writing last week for the British magazine The Spectator, Ed West, deputy editor of the Catholic Herald, said, "The last month and a half has seen perhaps the worst anti-Christian violence in Egypt in seven centuries, with dozens of churches torched. Yet the western media has mainly focused on army assaults on the Muslim Brotherhood, and no major political figure has said anything about the sectarian attacks."
West went on to note that both the American and the British press are among those that have under-reported this persecution.
While there have been stories of Muslims protecting Christian neighbors, in some predominantly Islamic lands, Christians continue to be prime targets. Two weeks ago, Taliban suicide bombers in Peshawar, Pakistan, killed at least 85 worshipers at All Saints' Church, which had been in that city since 1883. The result of such attacks is often that other Christians flee the country. One report says that two-thirds of Iraqi Christians have now vanished from that country, either murdered or having fled for their lives. Testifying before Congress in 2011, Nina Shea, an international human-rights lawyer, said that starting in 2004 in Iraq, "Christians ... have been raped, tortured, kidnapped, beheaded and evicted from their homes."
In Syria, bad as Bashar al-Assad is, many Christians fear what will  happen to them if he falls. There are reports that some rebel Islamic groups are killing Christians.
Speaking at Britain's National Liberal Club last month, historian Tom Holland said that we are now seeing the extinction of Christianity and other minority faiths in the Middle East. As reported in The Spectator, Holland described this as "the culmination of the long process that began in the Balkans in the late 19th century, reached its horrific European climax in 1939-1945 and continued with the Greeks of Alexandria, the Mizrahi Jews and, most recently, the Chaldo-Assyrian Christians of Iraq." Holland added that the Copts may have the numbers to hold on, as do the Jews of Israel, but he wondered out loud if any other minority-religion groups can.
Some observers are now raising the question of why churches in the West have been largely silent about this persecution. It appears not even to have the attention of Christians in America, Britain and other Western countries. Christians have been too busy with other things or "just too frightened of controversy to raise [the issue of] Muslim-on-Christian violence."
According to a PBS news report last year, the only Middle-Eastern country that has a growing Christian population is Israel. "There are no more Christians in Algeria, in Tunisia, in Libya, where there was a majority of Christians 700, 800 years ago. They're gone. There's ... no one," Mary-Jane Deeb, head of the Africa and Middle East division of the Library of Congress told PBS last year. "In the rest of the region, that will also happen as more Christians are emigrating. They're leaving."
Writing last week in The Daily Beast, columnist Kirsten Powers commented, "It's no surprise that Jews seem to understand the gravity of the situation the best. In December 2011, Britain's chief rabbi, Lord Jonathan Sacks, addressed Parliament saying, "I have followed the fate of Christians in the Middle East for years, appalled at what is happening, surprised and distressed ... that it is not more widely known." Sacks added, "It was Martin Luther King who said, 'In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.' That is why I felt I could not be silent today."
Yet churches in America remain quiet on the matter.
More on this story can be found at these links:
A Global Slaughter of Christians, but America's Churches Stay Silent. The Daily Beast
The Silence of Our Friends -- the Extinction of Christianity in the Middle East. The Spectator
Persecution Against Christians Increases in Many Parts of the World. Washington Times
Testimony ... on Recent Attacks Targeting Minorities in Iraq and Egypt. US Commission on International Religious Freedom
Eyes Gouged Out, Bodies Hanging From Hooks .... Daily Mail (UK)
The Big Questions
1. Why do you think American churches have been largely silent about the bloody persecution of Christians and other religious minorities in Islamic countries? Do you think our lack of response means that American Christians are self-centered? Do you think it is because we have enough problems of our own? Could it mean we aren't really that committed to Christianity?
2. Is our silence about such persecution justifiable on the basis that there's little we can do to prevent it? Is that even true? Why or why not? How much of our silence has to do with the fact that Christians who live abroad do not speak the same languages, dress the same, share our cultural assumptions? How much is due to this sort of news seldom being reported? Is there a relationship?
3. Should we consider Christians in the Middle East to be our spiritual brothers and sisters? Why or why not? If yes, what does it actually mean that they are our spiritual family members? What message do we send by remaining uninvolved?
4. At what point does our silence about the persecution of Christians in distant places become sinful? At what point does our silence about the persecution of members of other religious minorities in distant places become sinful? Name one way you can become involved as a class, either directly with individuals overseas, or in your congregation, parish, district, etc.
5. Once Christians have been either murdered or driven out of a specific country, that means there are no representatives of our faith in that land to be witnesses for Christ and offer fellowship to converts. Should that concern us? Is Christian witness and fellowship from a safe distance via technology sufficient?
6. We Christians  in the United States are not usually persecuted because of our faith -- and nowhere near to the extent of these overseas examples. Many of us are barely even inconvenienced for it. Does that put any special responsibility on us regarding Christians who are severely persecuted because of their faith? Where should we establish the boundaries of our involvement? In some instances in the U.S., does the lack of persecution indicate that something is lacking in the life or witness of many Christians?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Judges 5:23
Curse Meroz, says the angel of the LORD, curse bitterly its inhabitants, because they did not come to the help of the LORD,  to the help of the LORD against the mighty. (For context, read 5:19-23.)
Judges 5 contains the "Song of Deborah," the words she sang after the Israelite victory over the Canaanites, led by Deborah and Barak. The song is mostly celebratory, but the lines above are a curse directed at the town or clan of Meroz, a group of Israelites who declined to send any soldiers to help in the fighting against Israel's enemy. Deborah says the curse comes from "the angel of the LORD." Whether anything bad befell Meroz as a result is not known, but clearly, the song proclaims a dim view of people who refused to come to the aid of their fellow Israelites.
Questions: Ought we to feel any obligation to help persecuted Christians in other parts of the world? Why or why not? What form can that help take? What combination of prayer, financial, political and/or physical presence and support should it take?
Esther 4:14
For if you keep silence at such a time as this, relief and deliverance will rise for the Jews from another quarter, but you and your father's family will perish. Who knows? Perhaps you have come to royal dignity for just such a time as this. (For context, read 4:1-17.)
The book of Esther contains the story of a royal decree that Jewish people living in the Persian Empire were to be killed, and how Queen Esther, a Jew herself, though the king didn't know it, saved them by intervening with the king (a dangerous act, depending on the king's mood). The line above is spoken by Esther's relative Mordecai, suggesting that maybe the whole reason Esther had been selected by the king to be his queen was so she could be in the right place to avert the crisis and save her people.
Mordecai says that if Esther chooses not to act, her "silence" will not keep help from arising from "another quarter," but his implication is that her silence at such a time would be wrong.
Questions: What are some specific situations where the "silence" of Christians -- either saying nothing or doing nothing -- is actually sinful? How might we overcome "silence" about the persecution of Christians today? Mordecai speaks of "such a time as this." Is there a special urgency about this particular issue? As a group, rank where this issue stands for you in comparison to other local and national concerns of faith.
Luke 21:17
You will be hated by all because of my name. (For context, read 21:7-18.)
Jesus said this to his disciples in the first century, but it remains true in many places yet today.
Questions: Jesus implies that some persecution is inevitable. What are the dangers of accepting inevitabilities? For instance, does it make us complacent about such matters? What might these words of Jesus say to us if we are not feeling particularly persecuted?
1 Corinthians 16:1-3
Now concerning the collection for the saints: you should follow the directions I gave to the churches of Galatia. On the first day of every week, each of you is to put aside and save whatever extra you earn, so that collections need not be taken when I come. And when I arrive, I will send any whom you approve with letters to take your gift to Jerusalem. (For context, 16:1-4. Cf. Romans 15:25-27, 30-33; 2 Corinthians 8-9; Galatians 2:10.)
The New Testament contains no example of a church being asked to stand up on behalf of Christians elsewhere to stop persecution, but the "collection for the saints," which Paul and his coworkers were soliciting from the churches throughout the Roman Empire to aid Christians in Jerusalem shows a similar precedent.
We don't know the details about need in the Jerusalem church, but Acts 11 refers to a famine that required relief to be sent to "the brothers and sisters in Judea" (vv. 28-29), the province that included Jerusalem. The ancient historian Josephus mentions a famine in Palestine during the reign of the Emperor Claudius, which coincides with the time of Paul's ministry. This may have been the famine that triggered the offering.
Even though the Christians in the distant churches didn't know the Jerusalem Christians, they recognized the common ground in Christ sufficiently that they gave to help their brothers and sisters in the faith.
Questions: When has someone given you unsolicited but welcome help? What made it helpful? Note that the apostle assumes that economic assistance, prayer and action are all tied together, and that assistance to other Christians is essential. What does your church consider essential to its survival? Does your church consider the well-being of other Christians essential to its larger ministries and identity?
For Further Discussion
1. One TWW team member remembers that at a denominational assembly earlier this year a Nigerian bishop told how one of his Christian churches was burned to the ground by extremists. Some of the young people in his church retaliated by burning a mosque. He sent them back to rebuild the mosque, in order to demonstrate that Christians do not retaliate, and that Jesus calls on us to love our enemies and to do good for those who hate us. This bishop had earlier told the assembly that "Muslims and Christians are in agreement about certain social issues and work together where there are great needs." Consider the following questions:
• Do you have the courage of your Christian convictions to actually live out the words of Jesus even when they seem impractical and dangerous?
• This bishop said that even though there is a good deal of violence directed toward churches and mosques, Christians and Muslims found they could work together on issues where they shared the same vision and saw the same concerns that needed to be addressed. How might this be translated usefully into American life? into U.S. politics?
2. Comment on this, from a German pastor named Martin Niemoeller following WW II:
In Germany, they came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time, no one was left to speak up.
3. Respond to this: Historically, the intensity of persecution has been geared to the intensity and faithfulness of the witness given by Christians. The brighter Christians burned with faithfulness to Jesus, the more likely they were to be persecuted. In some parts of the world today, however, merely being identified as a Christian seems sufficient to make one a target for persecution.
4. Discuss this, from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a Lutheran pastor in Germany who resisted Hitler and was executed by the Nazis: "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act."
Responding to the News
This is a good time to find ways you can help persecuted Christians worldwide. Start by checking with your denomination to see what efforts it already has underway.
There are also organizations concerned specifically with the persecution of Christians. Two we are aware of are International Christian Concern and Open Doors.
Additionally, there is a federal body that "monitors the conditions of religious liberty abroad and recommends policies to the President, Secretary of State and Congress to advance this most precious right": United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Freedom House is a human-rights organization that also promotes freedom from religious persecution.
Closing Prayer

O God, thank you for the promise of the crown of life to all those who stay faithful through persecution. Enable us to find ways to strengthen, encourage and help the persecuted in the name of Jesus. Let us not be sinfully silent. Amen.According to an Associated Press report of the terrorist attack on the mall in Nairobi, Kenya, last month that left more than 70 people dead, the Somali Islamic militant group "separated Muslims from other people and let the Muslims go free." Witnesses said that the gunmen determined which shoppers were Muslim by asking the captives questions about Islam. If they couldn't answer, they were shot or tortured to death. Kenyan soldiers reported bodies with eyes gouged out and hung from ceiling hooks, castrated men, fingers removed with pliers, hands sharpened "like a pencil" and other horrors.
Sadly, this singling out of non-Muslims for persecution and death is no isolated incident in the Middle East and some parts of Africa today, and many Christians are among the victims. In fact, Christianity itself is often under attack throughout the region, to the point that some observers are now talking about the coming extinction of Christianity in the Middle East. Western churches, however, have said little about the slaughter.
Writing last week for the British magazine The Spectator, Ed West, deputy editor of the Catholic Herald, said, "The last month and a half has seen perhaps the worst anti-Christian violence in Egypt in seven centuries, with dozens of churches torched. Yet the western media has mainly focused on army assaults on the Muslim Brotherhood, and no major political figure has said anything about the sectarian attacks."
West went on to note that both the American and the British press are among those that have under-reported this persecution.
While there have been stories of Muslims protecting Christian neighbors, in some predominantly Islamic lands, Christians continue to be prime targets. Two weeks ago, Taliban suicide bombers in Peshawar, Pakistan, killed at least 85 worshipers at All Saints' Church, which had been in that city since 1883. The result of such attacks is often that other Christians flee the country. One report says that two-thirds of Iraqi Christians have now vanished from that country, either murdered or having fled for their lives. Testifying before Congress in 2011, Nina Shea, an international human-rights lawyer, said that starting in 2004 in Iraq, "Christians ... have been raped, tortured, kidnapped, beheaded and evicted from their homes."
In Syria, bad as Bashar al-Assad is, many Christians fear what will  happen to them if he falls. There are reports that some rebel Islamic groups are killing Christians.
Speaking at Britain's National Liberal Club last month, historian Tom Holland said that we are now seeing the extinction of Christianity and other minority faiths in the Middle East. As reported in The Spectator, Holland described this as "the culmination of the long process that began in the Balkans in the late 19th century, reached its horrific European climax in 1939-1945 and continued with the Greeks of Alexandria, the Mizrahi Jews and, most recently, the Chaldo-Assyrian Christians of Iraq." Holland added that the Copts may have the numbers to hold on, as do the Jews of Israel, but he wondered out loud if any other minority-religion groups can.
Some observers are now raising the question of why churches in the West have been largely silent about this persecution. It appears not even to have the attention of Christians in America, Britain and other Western countries. Christians have been too busy with other things or "just too frightened of controversy to raise [the issue of] Muslim-on-Christian violence."
According to a PBS news report last year, the only Middle-Eastern country that has a growing Christian population is Israel. "There are no more Christians in Algeria, in Tunisia, in Libya, where there was a majority of Christians 700, 800 years ago. They're gone. There's ... no one," Mary-Jane Deeb, head of the Africa and Middle East division of the Library of Congress told PBS last year. "In the rest of the region, that will also happen as more Christians are emigrating. They're leaving."
Writing last week in The Daily Beast, columnist Kirsten Powers commented, "It's no surprise that Jews seem to understand the gravity of the situation the best. In December 2011, Britain's chief rabbi, Lord Jonathan Sacks, addressed Parliament saying, "I have followed the fate of Christians in the Middle East for years, appalled at what is happening, surprised and distressed ... that it is not more widely known." Sacks added, "It was Martin Luther King who said, 'In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.' That is why I felt I could not be silent today."
Yet churches in America remain quiet on the matter.
More on this story can be found at these links:
A Global Slaughter of Christians, but America's Churches Stay Silent. The Daily Beast
The Silence of Our Friends -- the Extinction of Christianity in the Middle East. The Spectator
Persecution Against Christians Increases in Many Parts of the World. Washington Times
Testimony ... on Recent Attacks Targeting Minorities in Iraq and Egypt. US Commission on International Religious Freedom
Eyes Gouged Out, Bodies Hanging From Hooks .... Daily Mail (UK)
The Big Questions
1. Why do you think American churches have been largely silent about the bloody persecution of Christians and other religious minorities in Islamic countries? Do you think our lack of response means that American Christians are self-centered? Do you think it is because we have enough problems of our own? Could it mean we aren't really that committed to Christianity?
2. Is our silence about such persecution justifiable on the basis that there's little we can do to prevent it? Is that even true? Why or why not? How much of our silence has to do with the fact that Christians who live abroad do not speak the same languages, dress the same, share our cultural assumptions? How much is due to this sort of news seldom being reported? Is there a relationship?
3. Should we consider Christians in the Middle East to be our spiritual brothers and sisters? Why or why not? If yes, what does it actually mean that they are our spiritual family members? What message do we send by remaining uninvolved?
4. At what point does our silence about the persecution of Christians in distant places become sinful? At what point does our silence about the persecution of members of other religious minorities in distant places become sinful? Name one way you can become involved as a class, either directly with individuals overseas, or in your congregation, parish, district, etc.
5. Once Christians have been either murdered or driven out of a specific country, that means there are no representatives of our faith in that land to be witnesses for Christ and offer fellowship to converts. Should that concern us? Is Christian witness and fellowship from a safe distance via technology sufficient?
6. We Christians  in the United States are not usually persecuted because of our faith -- and nowhere near to the extent of these overseas examples. Many of us are barely even inconvenienced for it. Does that put any special responsibility on us regarding Christians who are severely persecuted because of their faith? Where should we establish the boundaries of our involvement? In some instances in the U.S., does the lack of persecution indicate that something is lacking in the life or witness of many Christians?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:
Judges 5:23
Curse Meroz, says the angel of the LORD, curse bitterly its inhabitants, because they did not come to the help of the LORD,  to the help of the LORD against the mighty. (For context, read 5:19-23.)
Judges 5 contains the "Song of Deborah," the words she sang after the Israelite victory over the Canaanites, led by Deborah and Barak. The song is mostly celebratory, but the lines above are a curse directed at the town or clan of Meroz, a group of Israelites who declined to send any soldiers to help in the fighting against Israel's enemy. Deborah says the curse comes from "the angel of the LORD." Whether anything bad befell Meroz as a result is not known, but clearly, the song proclaims a dim view of people who refused to come to the aid of their fellow Israelites.
Questions: Ought we to feel any obligation to help persecuted Christians in other parts of the world? Why or why not? What form can that help take? What combination of prayer, financial, political and/or physical presence and support should it take?
Esther 4:14
For if you keep silence at such a time as this, relief and deliverance will rise for the Jews from another quarter, but you and your father's family will perish. Who knows? Perhaps you have come to royal dignity for just such a time as this. (For context, read 4:1-17.)
The book of Esther contains the story of a royal decree that Jewish people living in the Persian Empire were to be killed, and how Queen Esther, a Jew herself, though the king didn't know it, saved them by intervening with the king (a dangerous act, depending on the king's mood). The line above is spoken by Esther's relative Mordecai, suggesting that maybe the whole reason Esther had been selected by the king to be his queen was so she could be in the right place to avert the crisis and save her people.
Mordecai says that if Esther chooses not to act, her "silence" will not keep help from arising from "another quarter," but his implication is that her silence at such a time would be wrong.
Questions: What are some specific situations where the "silence" of Christians -- either saying nothing or doing nothing -- is actually sinful? How might we overcome "silence" about the persecution of Christians today? Mordecai speaks of "such a time as this." Is there a special urgency about this particular issue? As a group, rank where this issue stands for you in comparison to other local and national concerns of faith.
Luke 21:17
You will be hated by all because of my name. (For context, read 21:7-18.)
Jesus said this to his disciples in the first century, but it remains true in many places yet today.
Questions: Jesus implies that some persecution is inevitable. What are the dangers of accepting inevitabilities? For instance, does it make us complacent about such matters? What might these words of Jesus say to us if we are not feeling particularly persecuted?
1 Corinthians 16:1-3
Now concerning the collection for the saints: you should follow the directions I gave to the churches of Galatia. On the first day of every week, each of you is to put aside and save whatever extra you earn, so that collections need not be taken when I come. And when I arrive, I will send any whom you approve with letters to take your gift to Jerusalem. (For context, 16:1-4. Cf. Romans 15:25-27, 30-33; 2 Corinthians 8-9; Galatians 2:10.)
The New Testament contains no example of a church being asked to stand up on behalf of Christians elsewhere to stop persecution, but the "collection for the saints," which Paul and his coworkers were soliciting from the churches throughout the Roman Empire to aid Christians in Jerusalem shows a similar precedent.
We don't know the details about need in the Jerusalem church, but Acts 11 refers to a famine that required relief to be sent to "the brothers and sisters in Judea" (vv. 28-29), the province that included Jerusalem. The ancient historian Josephus mentions a famine in Palestine during the reign of the Emperor Claudius, which coincides with the time of Paul's ministry. This may have been the famine that triggered the offering.
Even though the Christians in the distant churches didn't know the Jerusalem Christians, they recognized the common ground in Christ sufficiently that they gave to help their brothers and sisters in the faith.
Questions: When has someone given you unsolicited but welcome help? What made it helpful? Note that the apostle assumes that economic assistance, prayer and action are all tied together, and that assistance to other Christians is essential. What does your church consider essential to its survival? Does your church consider the well-being of other Christians essential to its larger ministries and identity?
For Further Discussion
1. One TWW team member remembers that at a denominational assembly earlier this year a Nigerian bishop told how one of his Christian churches was burned to the ground by extremists. Some of the young people in his church retaliated by burning a mosque. He sent them back to rebuild the mosque, in order to demonstrate that Christians do not retaliate, and that Jesus calls on us to love our enemies and to do good for those who hate us. This bishop had earlier told the assembly that "Muslims and Christians are in agreement about certain social issues and work together where there are great needs." Consider the following questions:
• Do you have the courage of your Christian convictions to actually live out the words of Jesus even when they seem impractical and dangerous?
• This bishop said that even though there is a good deal of violence directed toward churches and mosques, Christians and Muslims found they could work together on issues where they shared the same vision and saw the same concerns that needed to be addressed. How might this be translated usefully into American life? into U.S. politics?
2. Comment on this, from a German pastor named Martin Niemoeller following WW II:
In Germany, they came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time, no one was left to speak up.
3. Respond to this: Historically, the intensity of persecution has been geared to the intensity and faithfulness of the witness given by Christians. The brighter Christians burned with faithfulness to Jesus, the more likely they were to be persecuted. In some parts of the world today, however, merely being identified as a Christian seems sufficient to make one a target for persecution.
4. Discuss this, from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a Lutheran pastor in Germany who resisted Hitler and was executed by the Nazis: "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act."
Responding to the News
This is a good time to find ways you can help persecuted Christians worldwide. Start by checking with your denomination to see what efforts it already has underway.
There are also organizations concerned specifically with the persecution of Christians. Two we are aware of are International Christian Concern and Open Doors.
Additionally, there is a federal body that "monitors the conditions of religious liberty abroad and recommends policies to the President, Secretary of State and Congress to advance this most precious right": United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Freedom House is a human-rights organization that also promotes freedom from religious persecution.
Closing Prayer
O God, thank you for the promise of the crown of life to all those who stay faithful through persecution. Enable us to find ways to strengthen, encourage and help the persecuted in the name of Jesus. Let us not be sinfully silent. Amen.