Friday, August 10, 2012

NASA's Rover -- Curiosity -- Lands on Mars


In the News

More than eight months after launch from Cape Canaveral, and 47 years after the first attempts to place a robotic explorer on the surface of Mars, NASA's Curiosity rover, a vehicle about the size of an SUV, touched down on the Red Planet last Sunday, with all systems intact and is already sending information back to Earth.

The event is remarkable for several reasons, not least of which is that the history of attempts to explore Mars -- including efforts by the United States, China, Russia, the European Space Agency and Japan -- is littered with failures and limited successes. The Curiosity mission is the 18th attempt to put a lander on Mars, with only eight of those landers making it to the surface safely.

The Curiosity mission, however, is on target to be all its designers had hoped.

After rocketing through space for more than eight months inside a larger craft, the Curiosity rover was lowered gently to the Mars surface after a complicated series of maneuvers that first accounted for the planet's gravity increasing the spacecraft's speed from 8,000 mph to 13,200 mph. Then, using a landing technique called "sky crane" -- which involved thruster rockets, a 51-foot-wide parachute and nylon cords -- the lander placed the rover on the surface at 1.7 mph. The lander itself then fired thrusters to propel itself out of the area before it crashed, as was intended, elsewhere on the planet. All of the landing sequence was directed by a preset program, since the time delay for radio communications was too long for control from Earth. The success of these maneuvers is all the more remarkable in that they could not be rehearsed first on Earth because of atmospheric differences.

Although the spaceflight had lasted more than eight months, the whole mission involved more than 5,000 people, some of whom had worked on this project for 10 years.

When Curiosity landed safely, mission control personnel leaped to their feet, expressing joy and relief. They say, however, that the moment of triumph celebrated just the success of the start of the Mars surface mission. The plan, still to come, is for Curiosity to drive around Mars, execute an effective scientific mission and relay the findings back to Earth.

Scientists and engineers at the U.S. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which is managing the mission for NASA, say the rover landed on an ideal location, where there is much for Curiosity, a six-wheeled geochemistry lab, to explore and analyze right in the neighborhood. Eventually, it will be directed to move to other areas for further exploration.

The rover is nuclear-powered and is designed to operate for a full Martian year -- two years Earth time -- but officials say it could easily last twice that long.

Curiosity carries 10 science instruments, some of which are being employed for the first time on a Mars mission. The cost of the whole mission is $2.5 billion, which includes spacecraft development, science investigations and the cost of launch and operations.

More on this story can be found at these links:

Curiosity Rover Hit the Perfect Spot on Mars, Scientists Say. Los Angeles Times
Why Is It So Hard to Land On Mars? Popular Science
Curiosity Lands On Mars: 10 Amazing Facts. Information Week
 
The Big Questions
1. Is conversion to follow Jesus a moment of decision, a lifetime of discipleship, both or something else? Explain your answer. When you think of your commitment to Christ, is it mostly a solo success, or can you look back and see that many people have had a hand in your life of discipleship?

2. What is holiness as it applies to the spiritual life? How is it related to spiritual maturity? Is it possible to be mature in years but immature in faith? How do we know?

3. In what ways is the Christian life like a sprint? In what ways is it like a pilgrimage? What is the difference? If the Christian race is a lifetime journey, what shorter races need to be run along the way?

4. How should you view hindrances, doubts, troubles and distractions on the faith journey?

5. What are the benefits of long-term obedience to God?

Confronting the News with Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Micah 4:5

"For all the peoples walk, each in the name of its god, but we will walk in the name of the LORD our God forever and ever." (For context, read 4:1-5.)

Micah 4:1-5 is a prophetic oracle that looks forward to a time when the people of the world live in peace and harmony. In that time, say these verses, people will recognize the one true God, seek to learn what God expects of them and no longer pursue war to settle disputes. People will be left undisturbed to live in prosperity on their own land.

Verse 5, quoted above, is the end of the oracle. It is an admission that the vision of hope described in verses 1-4 has not yet come to pass, for other nations continue to follow other gods. The followers of the true God, however, live in hope and commit themselves to continue walking in the way of the Lord until the promise is fully realized.

In other words, they are followers of the Lord for the long haul.
Questions: In what ways do you live out a similar long-haul commitment? What unexpected obstacles have come up during your life of discipleship? What contingency plans do you have for difficulties in your Christian "mission planning"?

Luke 2:36-38

"There was also a prophet, Anna the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was of a great age, having lived with her husband seven years after her marriage, then as a widow to the age of eighty-four. She never left the temple but worshiped there with fasting and prayer night and day. At that moment she came, and began to praise God and to speak about the child to all who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem." (For context, read 2:22-38.)

Anna is one of the people who recognized the baby Jesus as the redeemer sent by God when his parents brought him to the temple for presentation to the Lord (a ritual something like the dedication of infants in some churches today). What's remarkable about Anna is not merely that she was 84 years old, but that throughout those many years, she worshiped God in the temple "with fasting and prayer night and day."

This doesn't mean, as we might say today, that "she had no life," but rather that part of her daily routine included attention to her commitment to God. That faith routine also put her in the place where, when Jesus was brought near her, she was equipped to see what most others had not -- that redemption was at hand.
Questions: What has attention to your long-term commitment to God revealed to you about his ways in the world? About his will for you? About hope for the future?

Luke 17:20-21

"The kingdom of God is not coming with things that can be observed; nor will they say, 'Look, here it is!' or 'There it is!' For, in fact, the kingdom of God is among you." (No additional context needed.)

In the gospels, Jesus speaks of the kingdom of God both as a future realm (as in the Lord's Prayer petition "thy kingdom come") and as one that is already present (as in the verses above). Theologians usually take this to mean that the kingdom of God will come fully only in God's own time, but that it is already present in some ways in the hearts of Jesus' followers (thus, "the kingdom of God is among you"). If that is the case, then one task for believers is to live like citizens of that kingdom.
Questions: How is the inner kingdom of God made manifest? What evidence do you see of the kingdom of God at present?

Galatians 6:9

"So let us not grow weary in doing what is right, for we will reap at harvest time, if we do not give up." (For context, read 6:7-10.)

Author Eugene Peterson describes the Christian life as "a long obedience in the same direction."
Questions: In what ways is the phrase "a long obedience in the same direction" helpful to you in thinking about your commitment to Christ? In what ways does it make you uncomfortable? In what ways is it a challenge to walk more consistently in God's ways?

Does your congregation make long-term plans that give vision and guidance when people grow weary? Do you tend to wait until there is a problem or an opportunity before making decisions or changes? Has there been a time when you or your congregation indeed grew weary before the time of harvest? How have you dealt with that?

Philippians 3:13-15

"Beloved, I do not consider that I have made it my own; but this one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus. Let those of us then who are mature be of the same mind ..." (For context, read 3:10-16.)

Paul's use of the word "mature" in this context is telling, for he is not necessarily talking about people who are legally adults, but those who, regardless of their age, are "straining forward ... toward the goal for the prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus" -- in other words, those who are continuing in the practice and confidence of their faith in God through Jesus.

One of the signs that we are maturing in faith is when we realize and accept that the Christian life is not only a matter of initial repentance and commitment, but also a matter of perseverance.
Questions: When has persevering in faith helped you? How mature in faith would you say you are? Why? What prize, if any, do you and your congregation have your eyes on? Is there something that provides focus for your fellowship?

For Further Discussion
1. What are some benefits of space exploration? (For help with answers, see Why Space Matters. Benefits of Space.) Do you think the benefits are worth the cost?

2. There were years of work before Curiosity's landing, and it is expected there will be many more that follow it, but the landing was certainly a crucial and dramatic moment. If you can think of one crucial moment in your life of faith, a landing of sorts in Christ, what would it be? What took place before that moment that made it possible? Describe what has followed that moment.

3. Read the parable of the sower (Matthew 13:3-8) to your class and ask class members to connect that to today's topic of long-term obedience. If needed, read Jesus' explanation of the parable (Matthew 13:18-23).

4. In a world that wants things done in seconds, why would anyone gamble on a project that takes 10 years, with less than 50 percent chance of succeeding? When have you done something similar? Why did you do it?

5. One team member said she loved that the rover is named Curiosity, adding that curiosity is a quality of humanity made in the image of God. Why do you think God implanted curiosity in us? Is it because God himself is curious or is there another reason?

6. Comment on this, from a TWW team member: "The act of pilgrimage takes effort. It doesn't matter if it is a well-known pilgrimage path like the Camino de Santiago, or a retreat at Iona, or a walk on a cloth labyrinth in a church basement, the act of committing oneself to a journey is life-changing."

Responding to the News


This is a good time to renew our commitment to follow Jesus through whatever comes. 

Other News This Week
Attack on Sikhs Rooted in Xenophobia?

When a gunman opened fire in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin so soon after the massacre at a Colorado movie theater recently, some saw it as more of the same madness. But the two incidents differed in one significant way: Those hurt or slain in the theater a random mix of people who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, while the victims in the second shooting apparently were targeted because of their race or creed. So this lesson will address the issue of how we relate to those who are unlike us.

In the News


Last Sunday, Wade Michael Page, an Army veteran who may have been involved in the white supremacist movement, attacked and killed at least six people at a Sikh temple outside Milwaukee before he was wounded by police and then killed himself. Because Sikh men wear turbans and do not shave their faces, some have mistaken them for Muslim terrorists following the 9/11 attacks on the United States in 2001. Since then, the Sikh Coalition, a New York-based advocacy group, has recorded more than 700 attacks on Sikhs ranging from humiliation and vandalism to beatings and even murder.

In December 2001, a Sikh store owner in L.A. was beaten by two men wielding metal poles declaring, "We'll kill bin Laden today." Five years later another Sikh was stabbed at his San Jose home by a man who admitted that he wanted to "kill a Taliban." Vandals spray-painted the phrase "It's not your country" on the wall of a Sikh temple in Fresno in 2004; earlier this year another Sikh temple under construction in Michigan was defaced by the word "Mohmed" (presumably a misspelling of "Muhammad") and graffiti depicting a gun and a cross.

The United States is home to about 700,000 Sikhs, nearly all of Indian origin. "Our appearance looks like Osama bin Laden and those of Afghanistan," stated Suminder Sodhi, a friend of the first Sikh killed after 9/11. "But we are different people from Muslim people. We have different beliefs, a different religion." Sikhism, the world's fifth most popular religion, is a monotheistic faith that believes in equality and service to others, Sikh officials say.

Rajwant Singh, from the Maryland-Sikh Council on Religion and Education, said Sikhs growing up in the United States should not feel as though they don't belong. "Everybody should feel at home," he said Sunday. "This nation belongs to everyone."

More on this story can be found at this link:

Temple Shooting Dredges Up Memories of Long History of Bias Crimes Against the Sikhs. CNN

The Big Questions
1. Talk about a time you felt afraid or uncomfortable because you looked or behaved differently from those around you.?

2. Does it make a difference in your mind whether the victims of attacks were Sikh or Muslim?

3. How might Sikhs or Muslims be like lepers or Samaritans in the Bible? How did people in the Bible treat lepers and Samaritans? How did Jesus treat them?

4. Respond to this from TWW team member Frank Ramirez: "You're probably familiar with the word xenophobia, whose Greek roots mean either fear or hatred of strangers. [In the New Testament, the opposite of xenophobia is] sometimes translated as hospitality, but the [underlying Greek] word, philoxenia, really means "love for strangers." It's used in Hebrews 13:2, with the reminder that those who have shown hospitality have sometimes entertained angels without knowing it. (Hospitality isn't just welcoming folks like us in for cherry pie. It's showing extraordinary generosity and welcome for people who are not like us -- as per Abraham and the three strangers [Genesis 18], alluded to in the Hebrews scripture.) Philoxenia is the opposite of xenophobia, and it's the Christian value. It's valued by Sikhs, too. ... I seem to remember that somebody we all respect and admire not only told us to love our enemies, but also said we should do unto others as we would have them do unto us. I think we all know who said that."

Confronting the News with Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Romans 3:1, 9-10, 23-24, 27, 29-30
 
"Then what advantage has the Jew? Or what is the value of circumcision? ... What then? Are we any better off? No, not at all; for ... all, both Jews and Greeks, ... have sinned and fall short of the glory of God; they are now justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, ... Then what becomes of boasting? It is excluded. ... Or is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since God is one; and he will justify the circumcised on the ground of faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith." (For context, read 3:1-31.)
Questions: What are the benefits of emphasizing our differences? The dangers? What are the benefits of seeking to discover what we have in common? How does it change your view of others when you realize that everyone has the same need of God's mercy, and no one has a greater claim on God's love because of racial or religious identity?

Ephesians 2:12

"... remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world." (For context, read 2:11-18.)
Questions: How does your attitude change toward those who are different from you when you remember that you were once a stranger to the gospel, excluded from the family of God, and yet now God has accepted you among his beloved? If you grew up in the faith, does that make it harder or easier to answer the last question?

1 Samuel 16:7

"But the LORD said to Samuel, 'Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him; for the LORD does not see as mortals see; they look on the outward appearance, but the LORD looks on the heart.'" (For context, read 16:1-13.)  

Samuel looked at the outward appearance in hopes of discerning the man God had chosen to honor as king. But when God looked at the hearts of Jesse's sons, he didn't see the positive traits Samuel thought he saw, until David stood before him.
Question: Is it possible that we may also see negative attributes in others based on their physical appearance, while God looks at their hearts and sees something completely different -- hearts that are open to him in love and submission? How can we pattern our own approach to people on the way God relates to us?

Matthew 8:20

"And Jesus said to him, 'Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.'" (For context, read 8:18-22.)
John 1:11

"He came to what was his own, and his own people did not accept him." (For context, read 1:1-18.)
Matthew 25:37-40
 
"Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?' And the king will answer them, 'Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.'" (For context, read 25:31-46.)
Questions: How are you and your church welcoming strangers? In what ways do you welcome people who are different from you? How have you given the Son of Man a place to lay his head?

Romans 12:13, 18-20

"Contribute to the needs of the saints; extend hospitality to strangers. ... If it is possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave room for the wrath of God; for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.' No, 'if your enemies are hungry, feed them; if they are thirsty, give them something to drink ....'" (For context, read 12:9-21.)

Paul counsels the Roman Christians to care for one another, but he doesn't stop there. He urges them to go the next mile by welcoming strangers, even blessing their persecutors and meeting the needs of their enemies when they are hungry or thirsty.
Questions: How can you and your church live out this attitude of empathy toward the stranger among you in practical ways?

Closing Prayer

 
"Thanks be to thee, my Lord Jesus Christ, for all the benefits thou hast given me, for all the pains and insults thou hast borne for me. O most merciful redeemer, friend and brother, may I know thee more clearly, love thee more dearly and follow thee more nearly, day by day." Amen. (A prayer of Richard of Wyche, Bishop of Chichester, 1197-1253)
 
Copyright 2012 Communication Resources


Friday, August 3, 2012

Minority Denies Black Couple Marriage in Their Church


In the News

Picture this: A well-mannered and respectable man and woman have been attending your church for months. The man's 9-year-old daughter attends your Sunday school. The woman's father is a member of your church and her uncle is an employee of your church. The couple wants to be married at your church by your pastor, and they plan to join your congregation as members after the wedding.

In most congregations, this would be a welcome scenario. The couple would be gladly received and made to feel at home, and their pastor would be encouraged and even expected to officiate at the wedding.

In the particular congregation where Charles and Te'Andrea Wilson were attending and planning to join, they were told to move their wedding elsewhere and the pastor was threatened with being fired if he performed the ceremony in the church's building.

The reason? The Wilsons are African-American, and some members -- reportedly a vocal minority -- of the mostly white congregation of First Baptist Church in Crystal Springs, Mississippi, objected to the wedding because there had never been a marriage of a black couple in that church since its founding in 1883, and they didn't want to set a precedent.

Thus, just days before the scheduled July 20 wedding, the church's pastor, Stan Weatherford, who is white, told the couple he would still marry them, but the ceremony could not take place in the church where he was pastor. Weatherford did perform the ritual at a black church down the road a day after the originally planned date, but the change of venue and day forced the Wilsons to scrap months of planning.

Weatherford said he decided to ask the Wilsons to use a different location after being strong-armed with threats to his job by a small but powerful group of members. "I didn't want to have a controversy within the church," he said, "and I didn't want a controversy to affect the wedding of Charles and Te'Andrea. I wanted to make sure their wedding day was a special day."

The church's decision was picked up by a local news source and then went viral online. Some members of the congregation said they were surprised, indicating they hadn't known what happened to the Wilsons until the news broke, and they offered apologies. One member, Bob Mack, referring to the group within the church who had opposed the wedding and threatened the pastor, said, "We hope we can straighten them out, you know, get them to understand what Christianity is all about because they have some misconceptions about it."

Greg Duke, another First Baptist member, said that those who objected to the wedding don't represent the church. "It's not the majority of the church," he said. "Give us a second chance."

For Charles Wilson, these sentiments seem too late. He told one reporter that the time to "step up and be Christ-like" would have been before he and his wife were forced to move their wedding. "If it was such a minority of people, why didn't the majority stand up and say, 'in God's house we don't do this'?" he asked.

Another response came from leaders in the Southern Baptist denomination, who chastised the Crystal Springs church for turning the Wilsons away and urged the congregation to reject racial discrimination.

The community of Crystal Springs also rallied in support of the Wilsons and against intolerance, with city officials joining residents for a prayer walk through the downtown. Mayor Sally Garland told the crowd, "I hope that the eyes that have been focused on our unfortunate circumstances that we've been having will be as focused on our people and our unity that we have here today."

Charles Wilson said he has forgiven those who forced his wedding to a different location, but also says they should still be held accountable. In response to First Baptist members who have urged the couple to return to the congregation, he asked, regarding the people who turned them away, "How have they changed?"

Wilson praised the residents who came out to reject intolerance. "These people out here now are showing they are for something bigger and better than Satan could ever put out there," he said.

More on this story can be found at these links:

Church Refuses to Marry Black Couple in Mississippi. CNN
Black Couple Denied Wedding "Because of Race." 9 News
Mississippi Town Where Church Blocked Black Couple's Wedding Rallies.... NY Daily News
Mississippi Church That Refused to Wed Black Couple Criticized by Baptist Leaders. ABC News

The Big Questions
1. Does an existing church ever cease to be a church? Can the actions of a powerful minority cause a congregation to become a church in name only? That is, at what point is a church no longer part of the Body of Christ?

2. In what ways do you "cherry pick" which part of the Christian faith you wish to live by, while discounting others? Is this right? Why or why not? Is racial non-discrimination an essential part of Christian dogma, a major doctrine or a consequence of a better understanding of God's law?

3. How does this news story fit with the idea that the church is not an institution or a building, but a group of people? Is a church congregation formed by people or by God?

4. To what degree should a pastor be answerable to his or her congregation? To what degree should a pastor be expected to model Christianity at its best? What about when a pastor's view of what is the right thing differs from that of a vocal minority in the church? Should the pastor have acted and spoken prophetically regardless of any consequences? What would you have done in this position? (Bear in mind that doing "the right thing" might mean you would lose your job and have no easy prospects for another.)

5. Assuming you agree that the members of the Crystal Springs church who opposed the wedding in their building have some "misconceptions" about Christianity, how ought the rest of the congregation deal with them?

Confronting the News with Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Matthew 16:18

"And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it." (For context, read 16:13-20.)

The Greek word rendered as "church" in this statement by Jesus is ekklesia, the word underlying almost every instance of "church" in the New Testament. It is also occasionally translated as "assembly," but its primary meaning is "the called-out ones." As used in the New Testament, the ekklesia are those called out from the rest of the world to tell of God's salvation and do his will. Thus, a church is never a building, but an assembly or congregation of people who follow Jesus. Any building they might meet in, no matter how grand, is the house of the church, not the church itself.  

Some New Testament terms that parallel ekklesia are "little flock" (Luke 12:32), "my sheep" (John 10:26-27) and "my brothers and sisters" (Mark 3:35).
Questions: In what ways does your congregation live up to the meaning of ekklesia? Do you act as a flock -- that is, do you tend not only to support and protect each other, but also to conform to the opinions of others in your fellowship? Who functions as shepherd? Is your tendency to follow the shepherd or, more often, to resist the shepherd's leading? Have you ever been shepherded in a direction that turned out to be a wrong one?

1 Corinthians 11:20

"When you come together, it is not really to eat the Lord's supper." (For context, read 11:17-22.)

Though the Greek word ekklesia is often rendered in English as "church," the word "church," like its counterparts in other modern languages (Scottish kirk, German kirche, Dutch kerk) actually derives from the Greek word kyriakos, translated "Lord's" in the verse above. It means "belonging to the Lord," and "Lord" in this verse refers to the risen Christ.

In the Corinthian congregation, some Christians were behaving badly during their gatherings when Communion was served, and Paul argues in 1 Corinthians 11:17-22 that their actions made what should have been the supper belonging to the Lord, to which Christ invites all, become instead something contemptible -- a ritual which the Lord would disown.

So ultimately, what makes our Christian gatherings churches rather than social clubs, interest groups or service organizations is that they belong to Christ.
Questions: So what does it mean when a church tolerates or supports actions that Christ would spurn? Is it even possible for a congregation always not to tolerate actions that Christ would spurn? Is a congregation an assembly of forgiven sinners or of near-perfect people? To whom or to what body is your kyriakos accountable? Do actions that God would not condone on the part of a congregation disqualify members as Christians?

1 Corinthians 12:12-13

"For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ. For in the one Spirit we were all baptized into one body -- Jews or Greeks, slaves or free -- and we were all made to drink of one Spirit." (For context, read 12:12-27.)

In more than one place in the New Testament, the apostle Paul used the human body as a metaphor for the church. And here, the Greek word translated as body, soma, means exactly the same thing as the English word. Soma was a common word in biblical Greek, but what makes it a specialized term for the church is that in using it as a metaphor, Paul identifies Christ as the body's "head" (see Ephesians 4:15-16 -- "But ... we must grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by every ligament with which it is equipped, as each part is working properly, promotes the body's growth in building itself up in love").   
Questions: Together, what do the three terms kyriakos, ekklesia and soma reveal about how a church ought to treat those within its walls? Those outside its walls? If each member of the church corresponds to a part of a body, as Paul suggests, what is the result to a congregation when it loses individuals and families because of non-Christian actions? How much of the "body" can a church lose before it is no longer able to function? Are there times when part of the body must be "amputated" in order for the body to survive?

Matthew 7:21

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven." (For context, read 7:21-23.)

The meaning of these words of Jesus is easy to understand, but the wording of this verse in The Message perhaps expands how we think about it: "Knowing the correct password -- saying 'Master, Master,' for instance -- isn't going to get you anywhere with me. What is required is serious obedience -- doing what my Father wills."
Questions: In what ways is "serious obedience" another term for "following Jesus"? How do we keep from treating church attendance and other religious activities as "the correct password"? What might serious obedience look like now in the church that turned the Wilson wedding away?

Galatians 3:28-29

"There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to the promise." (For context, read 3:23-29.)

Here's a biblical standard for how to think of the racial, ethnic, economic and gender differences among us who "belong to Christ": We are all heirs of the divine promises and one in Christ.
Questions: With what diversity issues does your congregation struggle? Which diversity issues, as represented in this text, are you successfully navigating? Where have you had to work at making this verse a reality in your own walk with Christ?

For Further Discussion
1. Given that some members of the church in the news have apologized for the actions of the minority and asked for a second chance, should the Wilsons return there for worship? Why or why not?

2. Are a small home-based group that worships Christ and a large megachurch both equally the church? Why or why not? Does a group need to have a pastor to be a church?  

3. When has an action of your own congregation caused you to question whether you were in the right church? When have you spoken up against a position held by members of your congregation? What was the result? Were you ever confronted with a prophetic statement by your pastor or others at your church that caused you to question some of your assumptions about the faith?

4. Read the messages to the seven churches in Revelation 2-3. What might God's message to your church be today?

Responding to the News

 
This is not a time to focus on the shortcomings of the congregation in the news, but rather to use the news as an opportunity to consider how well our own congregation does in "being the church."

Other News This Week
Chick-fil-A Under Fire for Uncompromising Stance

Note to Teachers: We recognize that Christians are divided on the matter of same-sex marriage, and we suggest you not use this lesson as a forum on that topic. (TWW has had previous installments on that topic, most recently our lesson for May 20, 2012, which is available on the TWW website: www.TheWiredWord.com). This lesson is better used to talk about religious freedom and the right to speak and practice one's religious convictions regardless of how those matters might be viewed in the culture.

Recent comments made by Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy supporting the traditional view of marriage as between a man and a woman have set off a firestorm of criticism from officials in Boston, San Francisco, Chicago and New York who pledged to block the restaurant chain from opening franchises in their jurisdictions. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel declared that "Chick-fil-A's values are not Chicago's values."

Rev. Charles Lyons of the Armitage Baptist Church responded in a sermon: "Do not disrespect us ... We, too, are Chicago. If the thought police come to Armitage Baptist Church, we will meet them at the door respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die on this hill, holding a copy of the Sacred Scriptures in one hand and a copy of the U.S. Constitution in the other."

Cardinal Francis George of the Archdiocese of Chicago asked in the Catholic Chicago Blog if everyone who did not agree with Emanuel faced a similar fate. "Must those whose personal values do not conform to those of the government of the day move from the city?" George wondered. "Is the City Council going to set up a 'Council Committee on Un-Chicagoan Activities' and call those of us who are suspect to appear before it?"

Public pressure is mounting against the company for its uncompromising stand. At least seven petitions have been launched on Change.org, a social activism site, demanding that universities across the country remove existing Chick-fil-A restaurants or prevent new ones from opening on their campuses. The Atlanta-based chain's brand approval ratings have plummeted in the wake of Cathy's controversial remarks.

"We are very much supportive of the family -- the biblical definition of the family unit," Cathy said in an interview in July. "We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that ... we know that it might not be popular with everyone, but thank the Lord, we live in a country where we can share our values and operate on biblical principles."

The company issued a press release over the weekend, stating: "The Chick-fil-A culture and service tradition in our restaurants is to treat every person with honor, dignity and respect -- regardless of their belief, race, creed, sexual orientation or gender. ... our intent is to leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and political arena."

In a  related story, Jack Phillips, the owner of Lakewood's Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado, told local CBS affiliate KCNC-TV that he has no problem with lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) customers or staff members. He is willing to make any kind of cake for homosexuals except wedding cakes because he does not support gay marriage. "We would close down the bakery before we would compromise our beliefs," Phillips said. Local LGBT rights advocates and allies reportedly protested the bakery, and a Facebook group called "Boycott Masterpiece Cakeshop" is gaining momentum.

Victoria Childress, another baker who shares Phillips' beliefs, also refused to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple, citing her Christian faith as incentive. "I didn't do the cake because of my convictions for their lifestyle," she said in a November 2011 TV interview. "It is my right, and it's not to discriminate against them. It's not so much to do with them, it's to do with me and my walk with God and what I will answer [to] him for."

More on this story can be found at these links:

Chick-fil-A Gay Flap A "Wakeup Call" For Companies. NPR
Chicago Church Leaders Roast Rahm Emanuel Over Chick-fil-A Stance. Fox News
Chick-fil-A's Brand Approval Rating Plummets After Anti-Gay Controversy. Huffington Post
Jack Phillips, Denver Baker Who Refused Wedding Cake To Gay Couple ... Huffington Post
Chick-fil-A Food Fight Rages On. Washington Post

The Big Questions
1. Throughout the history of the church, Christians have faced opposition to their beliefs and practices and have either stood their ground or capitulated. What were some of the issues, practices or beliefs for which Christians were willing to suffer in the past? What are Christians willing to suffer for today? What tenets of your faith are so important to you that you would be unwilling to compromise on them?

2. Legal experts told FoxNews.com that it is disturbing that elected officials would threaten to use their power to block a company from doing business in their community because of a difference of opinion with people who work for the company. What is the role of government in shaping community values and practices? Would you feel the same way if, because of their understanding of scripture, a CEO, restaurant chain or bakery refused to serve an interracial couple? Which forms of discrimination would cause you to stand in opposition? Do you agree or disagree with the saying attributed to Voltaire: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"?

3. Rather than arguing the merits or demerits of same-sex marriage, talk about how your faith impacts your business decisions or the stands you take in your personal life. Are you willing to go against what is politically correct or culturally popular, to risk losing friends, your job or income, respect and status, in order to stand up for what you believe? What price are you willing to pay for your beliefs? What cost would be too high to pay to maintain your position?

4. What does the phrase "in the world but not of the world" mean in relation to business or workplace activities?

5. A Wired Word contributor wrote: "Business owners have to please both their desired customers and the government. Employees have the boss to please. Any of the three can make demands contrary to one's faith." Have you ever compromised your faith to please your customers, your boss, your friends, or the government?

Confronting the News with Scripture

Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

Daniel 3:8, 15-18

"Accordingly, at this time certain Chaldeans came forward and denounced the Jews. ... Nebuchadnezzar said to them, ... 'Now if you are ready ... to fall down and worship the statue that I have made, well and good. But if you do not worship, you shall immediately be thrown into a furnace of blazing fire, and who is the god that will deliver you out of my hands?' Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego answered the king, '... If our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the furnace of blazing fire and out of your hand, O king, let him deliver us. But if not, be it known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods and we will not worship the golden statue that you have set up.'" (For context, read 3:1-30.)
Questions: Have you ever engaged in civil disobedience in protest of a law or system you considered unjust, immoral or contrary to your conscience or the Scriptures? What would justify your taking such dramatic action? When would you be willing to compromise your beliefs? Would the threat of torture, grave bodily harm or death cause you to back down? What about an economic boycott against your business?

Daniel 6:4-5

"So the presidents and the satraps tried to find grounds for complaint against Daniel in connection with the kingdom. But they could find no grounds for complaint or any corruption, because he was faithful, and no negligence or corruption could be found in him. The men said, 'We shall not find any ground for complaint against this Daniel unless we find it in connection with the law of his God.'" (For context, read 6:1-9.)
Questions: There is a saying, "If you were arrested for being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?" What evidence could a prosecutor produce that would convince a jury of your peers that you really are a Christian? When Daniel's enemies wanted to eliminate him, they could not find cause unless they attacked him in the area of his faith. Is your own faith so vibrant that enemies want to snuff it out? If not, how can you strengthen your relationship with God?

Daniel 6:10-11

"Although Daniel knew that the document had been signed, he continued to go to his house, which had windows in its upper room open toward Jerusalem, and to get down on his knees three times a day to pray to his God and praise him, just as he had done previously. The conspirators came and found Daniel praying and seeking mercy before his God." (For context, read 6:10-28.)

Although Daniel knew there would be severe consequences for practicing his faith, he did not change his behavior to suit the laws or the times. He could have argued that the law was only for 30 days, and that God would understand if he suspended his daily prayers for a month. Instead, he maintained his regular practice of meeting with God three times a day, knowing that he was risking his life.
Questions: How is it that the practice of faith can be both a risk and a resource for us? How can we, like Daniel, find strength as we praise God and seek his mercy in the face of opposition?

Matthew 5:10-12

"Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you." (For context, read 5:1-12.)
Questions: When disciples of Christ are persecuted or reviled, is it always "for righteousness' sake" and "on account of Christ"? For what other reasons might followers of Jesus be maligned? How can you know whether the abuse you are encountering is due to your stand for Christ, or because of some other reason?

Acts 4:18-20

"So they called them and ordered them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus. But Peter and John answered them, 'Whether it is right in God's sight to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot keep from speaking about what we have seen and heard.'" (For context, read 4:13-22.)
Acts 5:40-42

" ... and when they had called in the apostles, they had them flogged. Then they ordered them not to speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go. As they left the council, they rejoiced that they were considered worthy to suffer dishonor for the sake of the name. And every day in the temple and at home they did not cease to teach and proclaim Jesus as the Messiah." (For context, read 5:27-42.)
Questions: What does it mean "to speak or teach in the name of Jesus"? Do positions about social issues such as civil rights, same-sex marriage, abortion, etc. fit this description? Why or why not? The apostles were willing to be whipped rather than compromise, and continued to teach and proclaim Jesus as the Messiah. Are you that committed to that message? Would you be willing to suffer dishonor for the sake of the name of Jesus? What is the content of the message you are declaring to the world by your life and words?

Closing Prayer

 
Help us, O Lord, to grasp clearly what you ask of us, and to do it faithfully. In Jesus' name. Amen.
 
Copyright 2012 Communication Resources